| Author |
Sony Xperia Rumours 2018 |
Moe87
Joined: Oct 26, 2017
Posts: > 500
PM |
They justify by saying that now they sell more wireless than wired.
But removing the jack does not mean ppl will buy wireless from them.
Users will use what they like, no matter if is from Sony, Philips, Beats etc...
I'd like to have the EAR DUO, but I also want to choose when I use wired or wireless.
They also say the FPS on back is due to design, no mention of USA fps story.
|
|
|
Madmiraj_-
Joined: Feb 20, 2018
Posts: 232
PM |
On 2018-03-19 00:54:03, Moe87 wrote:
They also say the FPS on back is due to design, no mention of USA fps story.
You surely don't believe that they'd just bring out the USA issue? They won't, no company ever would, just accept their mistake.. They won't say that it was all because of a patent issue or broken contract and they couldn't pay money to solve the issue and instead chose to change the overall position.. Don't. Expect. That.Not. From. Sony. At least.. They are arrogant.. |
Archdragoon
Joined: Mar 18, 2015
Posts: > 500
PM |
I see oppo's new phone with IMX519... but where is IMX500 
[ This Message was edited by: Archdragoon on 2018-03-19 07:14 ] Device : Xperia 1 II
Headphone : MDR-M1ST + MUC-S12SB1, ATH-DSR9BT, WH-1000XM4
DAC/AMP : PHA-2A |
Moe87
Joined: Oct 26, 2017
Posts: > 500
PM |
Please someone say this is true.... 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
https://sumahoinfo.com/2-4k-d[....]remium-and-xz2-ultra-poled-lcd
A high end version of XA2U is exactly what I need. 😍😍
As long as design does not follow XZ2.
[ This Message was edited by: Moe87 on 2018-03-19 13:36 ] |
ADIDA
Joined: Mar 12, 2016
Posts: > 500
PM |
It is true that it is true because almost all of the insider information has been confirmed |
ADIDA
Joined: Mar 12, 2016
Posts: > 500
PM |
LGDISPLAY 4K/4K+ RGBW Mobile HDR Premium screen.~The rare booking party is S... not Full RGB. It is actually a 4K arrangement of LCD RGBW, although it is a DC+PWM ( |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
The source is ESATO. Used FAKE info from ADIDA. |
RacSony
Joined: Mar 24, 2017
Posts: > 500
PM |
wait. so this user on weibo is using info from ESATO?
According to his past info, he doesn't look like use uncertain info. |
ADIDA
Joined: Mar 12, 2016
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2018-03-19 15:03:34, DACHA wrote:
The source is ESATO. Used FAKE info from ADIDA.
is not my info............
It's a mistake, this insertion has been there for a long time and has always been right
Similar information, I have not written |
ascariss
Joined: Apr 06, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2018-03-19 08:13:59, Archdragoon wrote:
I see oppo's new phone with IMX519... but where is IMX500
[ This Message was edited by: Archdragoon on 2018-03-19 07:14 ]
Source? |
AlvinZahranM
Joined: Apr 06, 2015
Posts: > 500
From: The Big Durian
PM |
On 2018-03-19 15:17:29, ascariss wrote:
On 2018-03-19 08:13:59, Archdragoon wrote:
I see oppo's new phone with IMX519... but where is IMX500
[ This Message was edited by: Archdragoon on 2018-03-19 07:14 ]
Source?
Daily Drivers: Galaxy S23 Ultra, Galaxy S22 Ultra, and iPhone 14 Pro Max
Secondary: vivo X80 Pro
Still using as a backup: Xperia XZ2
Still using (not as much): Galaxy Tab A 8.0 |
Moe87
Joined: Oct 26, 2017
Posts: > 500
PM |
If it is 16MP 1/2.6" , probably is a new version of the sensor used for selfies on XA Ultra.
Imx278 is newer version of 214.
380 replaces 378
486 replaces 386
Sony brings new sensors but keeps size and resolution. |
ascariss
Joined: Apr 06, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM |
Maybe I am doing my math wrong, but 1.22µm is not 18.7% larger than 1.12µm, but 8.93%, so where are they getting 18.7 from? |
itsjustJOH
Joined: Jul 23, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2018-03-19 16:59:02, ascariss wrote:
Maybe I am doing my math wrong, but 1.22µm is not 18.7% larger than 1.12µm, but 8.93%, so where are they getting 18.7 from?
Square both values, since a pixel is a square and the measurement unit is only the height/width of a pixel.
[ This Message was edited by: itsjustJOH on 2018-03-19 16:11 ] |
ascariss
Joined: Apr 06, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2018-03-19 17:11:04, itsjustJOH wrote:
On 2018-03-19 16:59:02, ascariss wrote:
Maybe I am doing my math wrong, but 1.22µm is not 18.7% larger than 1.12µm, but 8.93%, so where are they getting 18.7 from?
Square both values, since a pixel is a square and the measurement unit is only the height/width of a pixel.
[ This Message was edited by: itsjustJOH on 2018-03-19 16:11 ]
|
|
|
Posted: 2018-03-19 00:54
