| Author |
Unveiling Xperia XZ Premium |
moogoo
Joined: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: NYC
PM, WWW
|
Kurtdean.. I agree with you. The images shouldn't be the same exact sizes but then it would make it too easy to tell which photo is which phone. But it's also why the test is stupid and shouldn't be done in the first place.
Tsepz is here cause atom bomb was tearing up the s8 threads.. they're having a little trolling war.
Xzp is sure winner. Even gsmarena readers chose it over the s8.
I can't wait to get mine. I ordered the clear hard case and hopefully can get the screen protector soon
moogoo
Nokia 5160 -> Nokia 8260 -> SE T68i -> SE K700i -> SE Z710 -> SE Xperia X10a -> Sony Xperia S -> Sony Xperia Z1 -> Sony Xperia XZ -> Sony Xperia XZ Premium -> Sony Xperia 1ii
Website: https://www.mikedoesitall.com |
|
|
Shino03
Joined: Dec 22, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
Just to be fair, for those who would have the device early. Could you please, take a sample of low-light shots similar to the one done by gsmarena. It will be highly appreciated.
It will be interesting to see if the normal range of ISO taken by XZP is really around 800 for those conditions. It is possible that they may have taken the camera with a lot of shakes intentionally.
But I still give them the benefit of thd doubt.
For Tsep, Samsung is great no need to be defensive about that.
I just hate bias reviewers and I am not saying gsmarena is. |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
Automatic mode = nonsense comparison.
All of them are set differently in this regard.
a w a r e |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
Please look here:
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_xzs-review-1600p9.php
Here are lowlight shots with manual settings.
Effects pretty much on par with S8...
Sony just uses Auto in a different way.
a w a r e |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
These are shots made with XZs with some manual settings adjusted.
Taken strictly from GSMArena.
Let's stop the bullsh..t.
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2017-05-20 14:16 ] a w a r e |
moogoo
Joined: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: NYC
PM, WWW
|
stop the madness! 
i don't know what's worse... having to wait 2.5 weeks to get my XZP or knowing that XJ will get it before me and having to contain my jealousy..
moogoo
Nokia 5160 -> Nokia 8260 -> SE T68i -> SE K700i -> SE Z710 -> SE Xperia X10a -> Sony Xperia S -> Sony Xperia Z1 -> Sony Xperia XZ -> Sony Xperia XZ Premium -> Sony Xperia 1ii
Website: https://www.mikedoesitall.com |
kurtdean
Joined: Nov 11, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: WONDERLAND
PM |
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_g6[....]a_xz_premium-review-1612p9.php xperia xz premium vs galaxy s8 vs g6. Xperia has the best daylight camera here |
badassmam
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
In a situation where you have a matter of seconds to capture a photo you should be able to get great results with auto, most photos are taken spur of the moment. The average user will not go adjusting on manual mode for that Facebook picture. Taking detailed shots on auto should be quick and easy, I shouldn't have to use the phone like a photographer uses his DSLR for that awesome photo. |
XperiaJunkie
Joined: Dec 13, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: Parts Unknown
PM, WWW
|
On 2017-05-21 05:00:04, moogoo wrote:
stop the madness!
i don't know what's worse... having to wait 2.5 weeks to get my XZP or knowing that XJ will get it before me and having to contain my jealousy..
Don't worry moogoo, I'll not post any pics or photos for a few days if you like but just to rub it in that bit more I could have my XZ Premium in as little as 72 hours fingers crossed.
I'm so happy 'cause today
I've found my friends ...
They're in my head
|
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
On 2017-05-21 09:54:32, badassmam wrote:
In a situation where you have a matter of seconds to capture a photo you should be able to get great results with auto, most photos are taken spur of the moment. The average user will not go adjusting on manual mode for that Facebook picture. Taking detailed shots on auto should be quick and easy, I shouldn't have to use the phone like a photographer uses his DSLR for that awesome photo.
And "the average user" doesn't care sh..t for the quality, nor does he have any means to judge it really.
So you contradict yourself.
So if you want a good result you need to know how to use it or how to make it.
Don't make idiots out of people.
a w a r e |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_g6[....]a_xz_premium-review-1612p7.php
Xperia XZ Premium has the best tripod lowlight as well.
a w a r e |
XperiaJunkie
Joined: Dec 13, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: Parts Unknown
PM, WWW
|
XZ Premium is now sold out in all of these countries through the official Sony website, France, Portugal, Ukraine and Russia are yet to open pre-orders too.
UK
Black - Sold out
Chrome - Sold out
Germany
Black - Sold out
Chrome - Sold out
Italy
Black - Sold out
Chrome - Sold out
Spain
Black - Sold out
Chrome - Sold out
Ireland
Black - Sold out
Chrome - Sold out
I'm so happy 'cause today
I've found my friends ...
They're in my head
|
josephnero
Joined: Mar 20, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: Sanford North Carolina USA
PM |
nice.xzp really deserves all the attention it's getting lately. Sony did well and I really hope it sells a lot. |
badassmam
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
@doministry
Disagree. People who pay good money will expect a certain level of quality. When did a salesman ever have to say you have to use manual mode to get a decent picture? The auto mode is supposed to give good quality images and the manual mode awesome pictures. The auto mode looks so poor, certainly not worthy of the price. It's lazy for Sony not to do so when they are capable of it.
At the end of the day, the GSMArena review took the effort to take high quality manual mode images and they look great but the comparison with the LG and Samsung looks poor in auto mode. There is a night and day difference when there shouldn't be. |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
On 2017-05-21 20:29:07, badassmam wrote:
@doministry
Disagree. People who pay good money will expect a certain level of quality. When did a salesman ever have to say you have to use manual mode to get a decent picture? The auto mode is supposed to give good quality images and the manual mode awesome pictures. The auto mode looks so poor, certainly not worthy of the price. It's lazy for Sony not to do so when they are capable of it.
At the end of the day, the GSMArena review took the effort to take high quality manual mode images and they look great but the comparison with the LG and Samsung looks poor in auto mode. There is a night and day difference when there shouldn't be.
And here you are totally wrong.
No amateur consumer will pixel peep or compare photo quality.
What GSMArena is seeing no average consumer will ever notice. Because this comparison is on semi-pro level nobody cares about.
Exept the detail Sony shots are more pleasing, more "rounded" for the eye.
That is what average consumer will see.
a w a r e |
|
|
Posted: 2017-05-19 23:11
