Esato

Forum > Manufacturer Discussion > Samsung > Samsung Galaxy Note 4

Previous  123 45 ... 434445  Next
Author Samsung Galaxy Note 4
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2014-09-13 22:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I found the Galaxy S5 battery average at best not much different from other new flagships. But I am a heavy user
Phone?? What phone??
northmonkey
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2014-09-13 23:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I've found the S5 battery very good, the other day I unplugged it at 7.30am and used the Internet and listened to a lot of music, battery was still at 45% at 6.30pm.
rikken
Xperia Arc Black
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM
Posted: 2014-09-15 20:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Another great display:
http://gizmodo.com/the-galaxy[....]ay-of-any-smartphon-1634804182
Wishmaster89
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Jun 02, 2006
Posts: 333
From: Warsaw, Poland
PM
Posted: 2014-09-15 22:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Do you really consider displaymate reviews so trustworthy? During last 12 months they have only reviewed Samsung mobile displays, don't you find it strange?
Samsung supplies them with devices they can test, so I'm sorry to say that, but it's rather unlikely that they are totally unbiased in their opinions.
But it works for Samsung to have a good PR.
aussieland1
LG Nexus 5
Joined: Apr 11, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2014-09-15 22:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2014-09-15 22:09:57, Wishmaster89 wrote:
Do you really consider displaymate reviews so trustworthy? During last 12 months they have only reviewed Samsung mobile displays, don't you find it strange?
Samsung supplies them with devices they can test, so I'm sorry to say that, but it's rather unlikely that they are totally unbiased in their opinions.
But it works for Samsung to have a good PR.


I believe that the article is backed by actual tests- it is not just an opinion, so I am not too sure how they can be biased ? But if some other party/site will perform similar test and find different results then we could conclude I suppose that displaymate is biased.
[ This Message was edited by: aussieland1 on 2014-09-15 21:26 ]
skblakee
Samsung Galaxy Note II
Joined: May 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: St.Kitts, West Indies
PM
Posted: 2014-09-15 22:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I wont be upgrading to this version but I do look forward to seeing what the screen resolution looks like. By the time I am ready to get the Note 5 the screen resolution race would have ended at QHD. Whats left for Samsung is screen brightness and more natural colours. They are improving on these two aspects quite well with each new iteration of their various flagships.
Galaxy Note III with 64gb micro SD
Visit St.Kitts in the Caribbean. Beautiful little place.
iPad Air 16GB
rikken
Xperia Arc Black
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 10:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2014-09-15 22:09:57, Wishmaster89 wrote:
Do you really consider displaymate reviews so trustworthy? During last 12 months they have only reviewed Samsung mobile displays, don't you find it strange?
Samsung supplies them with devices they can test, so I'm sorry to say that, but it's rather unlikely that they are totally unbiased in their opinions.
But it works for Samsung to have a good PR.


It is not for me to say who is biased or not, I leave that to you. But as far as I can see Displaymate do in-depths review of tv screens, laptops, smartphones etc through extensive tets and measurement.
[ This Message was edited by: rikken on 2014-09-16 09:16 ]
Wishmaster89
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Jun 02, 2006
Posts: 333
From: Warsaw, Poland
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 10:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
First of all, I didn't say that they are biased, I just said that the fact that Samsung is the only mobile brand they review recently makes one raise an eyebrow. Those are two totally different things!
Secondly, I'm not saying that Note 4 has shitty screen or even a bad one, but I remember that they said similar things about S5 screen where many sites didn't agree with what they said. So what makes this one any different?

I'd rather wait for a second or even a third opinion before concluding anything final.
miromiromi
Model not set
Joined: Jul 25, 2013
Posts: 481
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 11:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
^at least phonearena agrees with them on color accuracy this time around.
skblakee
Samsung Galaxy Note II
Joined: May 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: St.Kitts, West Indies
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 15:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@ Wishmaster Phonearena also does screen tests. Maybe we should and see what they say also. I also want to a caomparison table with the screen on the Note 4 and that of the iPhone 6 plus.
Galaxy Note III with 64gb micro SD
Visit St.Kitts in the Caribbean. Beautiful little place.
iPad Air 16GB
Tsepz_GP
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 18:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Just did a scan of this page, but I'm going to guess that people don't want to believe Displaymate's results as they go against their favorite manufacturer and are positive about Samsung, same ol' same ol', not even going to bother arguing as we all know Samsung make gorgeous displays and I cannot wait to have that Super AMOLED 2K display in my hand.

Displaymate gave the S5 a great rating and in real life the S5 display proved to be truly stunning, I'm not a fan of the S5 but put both it and the already incredible S4 display next each other and there is a clear difference despite lower PPI.
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max White Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 18:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I would love to see a Super AMOLED display in Quad HD it would certainly look better than LG G3 poor attempt. I was really disappointed with the G3 screen.
Phone?? What phone??
rikken
Xperia Arc Black
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 18:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2014-09-16 18:28:28, Tsepz_GP wrote:
we all know Samsung make gorgeous displays and I cannot wait to have that Super AMOLED 2K display in my hand.


I am really looking forward to that too their screens has improved with each iteration and I believe this one will be absolutely stunning.
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 19:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Perhaps Samsung asks Displaymate to publish their findings about their screens
Phone?? What phone??
Wishmaster89
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Jun 02, 2006
Posts: 333
From: Warsaw, Poland
PM
Posted: 2014-09-16 19:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@Bonovox
that is something I didn't consider, interesting POV. That would explain why there were no tests published of phones from other brands.

@all the rest
I didn't say that the screen is rubish, probably it is very nice and for FWIW I'm ready to admit that Note 4 really has the best screen on the market, heck if all the portals agree that Note 4 is the best screen when it comes to color accuracy, viewing angles and power efficiency I'll publicly admit it here!

I'm just not buying this whole Displaymate judgement, and I'm trying to be reasonable and don't take anything for granted.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 45 ... 434445  Next
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic