Author |
SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition |
Ambivalent_ Joined: Oct 15, 2012 Posts: > 500 From: Croatia, Zagreb PM |
Well, they already answered your question
That, however, will take at least a good six months or more in order for chip manufacturers like ST-Ericsson and Texas Instruments to release their latest SoCs.
Well it seems time is not an issues since this SoC would be ready by Q4 '13, it really only depends on Sony's decision weather they will go for it. |
|
randomuser Joined: Sep 13, 2011 Posts: > 500 PM |
A Rogue 6 GPU might be powering the Q4 Sony flagship but it's not certain at this moment. Sony is deciding between NovaThor A9600 and MSM8974 for its Q4 flagship. |
Ambivalent_ Joined: Oct 15, 2012 Posts: > 500 From: Croatia, Zagreb PM |
On 2012-11-18 13:00:13, randomuser wrote:
A Rogue 6 GPU might be powering the Q4 Sony flagship but it's not certain at this moment. Sony is deciding between NovaThor A9600 and MSM8974 for its Q4 flagship.
Thanx on the info man, please keep us up to date on this issue. Cheers! |
HxH Joined: Dec 26, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: GMT+7 PM |
I don't want to be harsh but dream on to see PowerVR G6630 in very near future
we haven't seen the first batch of "Rogue" series (G6200 - G6400)
IMHO, If Sony can handle battery issue, I'm sure they will use Novathor - Cortex A15 to compete with the rest of market.
[ This Message was edited by: HxH on 2012-11-18 12:54 ] SONY x Sexy x Sleek x Solid x Stunner x Stylish : Nozomi/Kagura with Love. |
Felimenta97 Joined: Dec 07, 2011 Posts: > 500 From: Ribeirão Preto, Brazil PM, WWW
|
Just so I can try to understand this thing:
The Snapdragon S3 Scorpion is like the Intel Core i7 1st gen.
The Snapdragon S4 Krait is like the Intel Core i7 2nd gen
The Snadragon S4 Pro is like the Intel Core i7 3rd gen.
And that Rogue is like a (imaginary) Intel Core i7 4th gen?
I don't get people. Never Have, never will. |
randomuser Joined: Sep 13, 2011 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2012-11-18 14:32:25, Felimenta97 wrote:
Just so I can try to understand this thing:
The Snapdragon S3 Scorpion is like the Intel Core i7 1st gen.
The Snapdragon S4 Krait is like the Intel Core i7 2nd gen
The Snadragon S4 Pro is like the Intel Core i7 3rd gen.
And that Rogue is like a (imaginary) Intel Core i7 4th gen?
Rogue is a GPU series not chipset like snapdragon.
|
itsjustJOH Joined: Jul 23, 2012 Posts: > 500 PM |
If Sony expects huge sales for 2013 with the Q4 flagship to bring the biggest contribution, can ST-Ericsson handle huge production if indeed they pick U9600 for their next flagship? |
Felimenta97 Joined: Dec 07, 2011 Posts: > 500 From: Ribeirão Preto, Brazil PM, WWW
|
On 2012-11-18 15:14:13, randomuser wrote:
On 2012-11-18 14:32:25, Felimenta97 wrote:
Just so I can try to understand this thing:
The Snapdragon S3 Scorpion is like the Intel Core i7 1st gen.
The Snapdragon S4 Krait is like the Intel Core i7 2nd gen
The Snadragon S4 Pro is like the Intel Core i7 3rd gen.
And that Rogue is like a (imaginary) Intel Core i7 4th gen?
Rogue is a GPU series not chipset like snapdragon.
Oh.
Anyway, put the Q4 flagship chipset in the place of the Rogue. Then the comparasion is right? I'm just trying to understand this thing lol
I don't get people. Never Have, never will. |
randomuser Joined: Sep 13, 2011 Posts: > 500 PM |
It's more like this
S3 = 1st gen Core i3 + Integrated GPU
S4 = 2nd gen Core i5 + Mid range Dedicated GPU
S4 Pro = 2nd gen i7 + Upper mid range Dedicated GPU
A9600 (with Rogue GPU) = 4th gen i5 + High end Dedicated GPU |
Detox Joined: Oct 10, 2007 Posts: > 500 PM |
C530X:
http://ameblo.jp/povtc/entry-11407264476.html
Phones: W800i | K800i | K850i | W902 | Xperia S | Xperia Z1 Compact | Xperia Z5 Compact | Xperia XZ1 Compact Firmwares: R1AA008 | R1CB001 | R1EA031 | R3EA037 | 6.2.B.1.96 | 14.4.A.0.157 | 32.4.A.1.54 | 47.2.A.11.228 |
DACHA Joined: May 17, 2011 Posts: > 500 PM |
Another concept Phone. Xperia Bravia. |
vikeviki Joined: Oct 16, 2012 Posts: > 500 From: INDIA,bangalore PM |
On 2012-11-18 17:38:27, DACHA wrote:
Another concept Phone. Xperia Bravia.
awesome dacha0
randumuser please get us more pictures of yuga and 6 inch phablet |
Ambivalent_ Joined: Oct 15, 2012 Posts: > 500 From: Croatia, Zagreb PM |
On 2012-11-18 17:49:58, vikeviki wrote:
randumuser please get us more pictures of 6 inch phablet
Fixed.
[ This Message was edited by: Ambivalent_ on 2012-11-18 17:12 ] |
mediar Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Varna, Bulgaria PM, WWW
|
Nowadays it's so much easier to draw a concept phone... Draw a black rectangle, put a gray line at the bottom with the SONY logo, some white gradient and you have it! No other shapes, no PS skills required, just MS Paint with 16 colors and here you go!
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
-XYZ Joined: Jul 26, 2012 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2012-11-18 18:37:57, mediar wrote:
Nowadays it's so much easier to draw a concept phone... Draw a black rectangle, put a gray line at the bottom with the SONY logo, some white gradient and you have it! No other shapes, no PS skills required, just MS Paint with 16 colors and here you go!
So what? Simple doesn't necessarily mean bad. The most stylish things often are the most simple. The Xperia S has an extremely simplisitic monolithic appearance, but that doesn't stop it from being absolutely beautiful. See for something to look good, you don't need to saturate it with colour, or too many shapes. Especially if you're designing a premium product. Too many different shapes and angles can often result in something looking like some kind of a toy. This is known as over-cooking design.
Heck, even the 2010-2011 Sony [Ericsson] Phones were hardly complex designs. They often had an incredibly simplistic design language. The Ray, in my opinion, the best looking 2011 device, was as simple as you could get. Black front, with nothing bit Sony Ericsson at the top, Xperia at the bottom and the two soft-keys and the home button. That's it. Nothing complicated. The ridiculous Gold and Pink versions did nothing to improve the device's look either.
Once again though, design is subjective. You can cry all day everyday about how it requires no skill needed to create a black square rectangle, not going to change the fact that there are plenty of people who enjoy such simplistic design.
On 2012-11-18 16:05:41, randomuser wrote:
It's more like this
S3 = 1st gen Core i3 + Integrated GPU
S4 = 2nd gen Core i5 + Mid range Dedicated GPU
S4 Pro = 2nd gen i7 + Upper mid range Dedicated GPU
A9600 (with Rogue GPU) = 4th gen i5 + High end Dedicated GPU
No, the A9600 would probably be the most powerful SoC on the market when released (depending on how many GPU cores it has). ARM Cortex A15MP2 1.5-2.5GHz + SGX640MP2 would be plenty to absolutely smoke the competition in every way conceivable.
[ This Message was edited by: -XYZ on 2012-11-18 18:42 ] |
|