Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Excellent 5mp shooters: Elm versus C901

Author Excellent 5mp shooters: Elm versus C901
crossmatched
C901 Silver
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: RP
PM, WWW
Posted: 2010-05-15 03:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
just want to update everybody that the author of this topic opted to take back his C901.
He swapped his 16gb stuffed ELm all for the Xenon flash of c901
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2010-05-15 02:49 ]
www.secondmanonthemoon.blogspot.com
we are all works under progress
exaflare23
Nokia Lumia 510
Joined: May 21, 2009
Posts: 227
From: Carmona, Philippines
PM
Posted: 2010-05-15 12:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
why n82 not mentioned rather than n6700 nevermind.


For me if i really want to take pictures, "mobile photography" C901 is my choice because of the flash, xenon flashe gives more light so it means more light more details, compare to Led flash, weak light results to low details of course, C901 can produce nice pictures for both day and night.as for ELM i wonder why SE produce a mobile phone with a good quality picture but with weak flash, vise versa, a very powerful flash but not so good in quality picture.
"You don't need a reason to help people"
-Nokia N82 5.0MP Carl Zeiss Optics
-My|Phone A878 Duo
My C901 Shots flickr
jtaviel
C901 Black
Joined: May 21, 2009
Posts: 24
PM
Posted: 2010-05-23 06:40
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2010-05-15 03:46:28, crossmatched wrote:
just want to update everybody that the author of this topic opted to take back his C901.
He swapped his 16gb stuffed ELm all for the Xenon flash of c901
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2010-05-15 02:49 ]





And I was thinking of ditching my C901.
The photos at night are not that good. All came out too soft. Even in sufficient light, when the xenon is turned on, the photo came out as if you took it in total darkness. Why? And when I turned the xenon off, the photos are "too soft". Plenty of details lost.

And when taking pics in broad daylight, it's either overexposed (and dry colors) or too dark. I can't seem to get the right settings.

moby1
Xperia X10 Mini Black
Joined: May 06, 2010
Posts: 15
PM
Posted: 2010-05-23 07:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post


The photos at night are not that good. All came out too soft. Even in sufficient light, when the xenon is turned on, the photo came out as if you took it in total darkness. Why? And when I turned the xenon off, the photos are "too soft". Plenty of details lost.

And when taking pics in broad daylight, it's either overexposed (and dry colors) or too dark. I can't seem to get the right settings.




Could you post examples? I am interested to see the bad side of this camera.
xclbr
Elm Black
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 113
From: PH
PM
Posted: 2010-05-27 07:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2010-05-15 12:56:53, exaflare23 wrote:
why n82 not mentioned rather than n6700 nevermind.


For me if i really want to take pictures, "mobile photography" C901 is my choice because of the flash, xenon flashe gives more light so it means more light more details, compare to Led flash, weak light results to low details of course, C901 can produce nice pictures for both day and night.as for ELM i wonder why SE produce a mobile phone with a good quality picture but with weak flash, vise versa, a very powerful flash but not so good in quality picture.



Maybe because it's just a mid-range phone, and for a mid-range phone the ELM is a bang for the buck.
samgob
C901 Black
Joined: Mar 23, 2010
Posts: 16
PM
Posted: 2010-05-30 12:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
c901 v.s Hazel j20 (both original driver)
the forum from Taiwan eprice
http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobi[....]48&page=1&list_page=1&rt=65712
translated by google
http://translate.google.com/t[....]D1%26rt%3D65712&sl=zh-CN&tl=en

See it! : )
[ This Message was edited by: samgob on 2010-05-30 12:25 ]
Hello!!
mriley
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2010-05-30 14:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@samgob
Thanks, I wish they uploaded full size
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!
-------------------
Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2010-05-31 21:11
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Well well, C901 is doing pretty good job, isn't? Even when not modded
arcmhyke
Sony Xperia TX
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Posts: 334
From: Philippines
PM
Posted: 2010-06-01 05:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2010-05-15 03:46:28, crossmatched wrote:
just want to update everybody that the author of this topic opted to take back his C901.
He swapped his 16gb stuffed ELm all for the Xenon flash of c901
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2010-05-15 02:49 ]



i tried advanced search of GSM arena and just filtered Xenon Flash, the search returned only 24 Phones having Xenon Flash and 8 of them came from

its pretty rare to have a camera phone with xenon flash
[ This Message was edited by: mhyke on 2010-06-01 04:16 ]
Phone: Sony Xperia TX LT29i
Camera: Cyber-shot DSC QX10
Speaker: SRS BTV5 Wireless Speaker
Headset: MW1 Smart Wireless Headset pro | MH EX300AP
mriley
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2010-06-01 15:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
its pretty rare to have a camera phone with xenon flash


Let alone one with full manual control! We can thank raiderski for that
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!
-------------------
Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can
TTT
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Feb 23, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2010-06-07 21:47
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
My IS for C901 vs. Elm


Now my dad has bought the Elm so hopefully I can make many more compare pictures but this will do for now.

C901 - Raider Camdriver (first)
Elm - Original Camdriver (second)







I don't know why IS choose to turn the first pic...





Strange focus...
[ This Message was edited by: TTT on 2010-06-07 20:50 ]
I taking pictures
anouk82
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Apr 13, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Athens,Greece
PM
Posted: 2010-06-07 21:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2010-06-07 21:47:37, TTT wrote:
My IS for C901 vs. Elm


Now my dad has bought the Elm so hopefully I can make many more compare pictures but this will do for now.

C901 - Raider Camdriver (first)
Elm - Original Camdriver (second)







I don't know why IS choose to turn the first pic...





Strange focus...
[ This Message was edited by: TTT on 2010-06-07 20:50 ]


that proves that once Elm get a modded driver,its bye-bye C901
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2010-06-07 21:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Dirty glass on Elm?
mriley
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2010-06-07 21:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
This looks like one of Planks comparisons
Could you upload pictures full size?
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!
-------------------
Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2010-06-07 21:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Sorry but where are you getting that mist or blur? I never get that on my Elm ever. Clean your lens Come on if you look at my shots today in the Elm thread you see no blur or mist I can't take them pics as right
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2010-06-07 21:07 ]
Phone?? What phone??
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic