| Author |
Post pictures taken with your c901 Cybershot phone |
thesun
Joined: Sep 02, 2009
Posts: 215
PM |
No edit, only resize.
Pics taken during cloudy hazy afternoon...
 |
|
|
gedas5
Joined: Mar 10, 2007
Posts: 380
PM |
thanx guys for nice pictures but can anyone upload video sample as i would like to see how video mode is performing  before deciding whether to buy this phone or not or just stay with c510  |
fahmi
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Posts: 25
PM |
On 2009-09-27 16:05:35, gedas5 wrote:
thanx guys for nice pictures but can anyone upload video sample as i would like to see how video mode is performing before deciding whether to buy this phone or not or just stay with c510
c510 is suckzzz..yesterday i trade it with c901 with no doubt...c901 have nice camera..if u wanna see c901 video juz go to u tube..there have alot example c901 video..better buy it..worth to buying it
|
gedas5
Joined: Mar 10, 2007
Posts: 380
PM |
@ fahmi
i know i might buy c901 but i'd love to see original video file uploaded here because youtube has it's own video handling decoder so the videos there might not be as accurate as original  i think i'll be strugling to get rid of c510  anyone want's to buy it? or trade to c901? |
thesun
Joined: Sep 02, 2009
Posts: 215
PM |
http://www.mediafire.com/?04t5jjmnny3
here are some of my stupid videos 
but it do consists of many many different conditions,
some are low light, daylight, total darkness with and without led video turned on and also zooming function in action..
as you can see some of them are used in my youtube account
http://www.youtube.com/geligapictures
sorry for the pointless video, but for me, my other videos that got important contents whether it is audio or video are privates and cannot be shared here or even youtube LOL
Night mode video framerate is bad, but it does provide better quality (less noise).
C901 are meant for pictures.. not for videos, however it does the job.
And don't ask for more videos, I'll will not entertain you..
It's time to get one for yourself already!!
[ This Message was edited by: thesun on 2009-09-27 16:43 ] |
gedas5
Joined: Mar 10, 2007
Posts: 380
PM |
@ thesun
thanx for the videos so i compared them to my c510 videos and i can say that the quality is almost the same which is quite a pitty as c510 is 3.2mp and c901 has 5mp camera module which should give better quality videos. however maybe further updates or modifications of camdriver could result in better video quality...
thesun if i get c901 in the end when it comes to UK i'll flood this forum with pictures |
chancooluk
Joined: Aug 17, 2003
Posts: 74
PM |
On 2009-09-27 18:01:32, gedas5 wrote:
@ thesun
thanx for the videos so i compared them to my c510 videos and i can say that the quality is almost the same which is quite a pitty as c510 is 3.2mp and c901 has 5mp camera module which should give better quality videos. however maybe further updates or modifications of camdriver could result in better video quality...
thesun if i get c901 in the end when it comes to UK i'll flood this forum with pictures
Do you know when it is meant to be coming to the UK? I know the release date is september, but there is only a few days of september left.... |
gedas5
Joined: Mar 10, 2007
Posts: 380
PM |
comparison of c510 and c901 video mode
c510 Data rate ~ 100 -120kbps more than c901
c510 Total bitrate ~ 70-90kbps more than c901
mind you that c510 had Code's modded camdriver with probably increased video bitrate but then it means that c901 is not using it's full potential and having sensor miles ahead of c510 should give results way better than this... so i think if in the future modders would like to have a look into inproving video mode i think much better results could be achieved... |
thesun
Joined: Sep 02, 2009
Posts: 215
PM |
On 2009-09-28 15:07:47, gedas5 wrote:
comparison of c510 and c901 video mode
c510 Data rate ~ 100 -120kbps more than c901
c510 Total bitrate ~ 70-90kbps more than c901
mind you that c510 had Code's modded camdriver with probably increased video bitrate but then it means that c901 is not using it's full potential and having sensor miles ahead of c510 should give results way better than this... so i think if in the future modders would like to have a look into inproving video mode i think much better results could be achieved...
I got a C702, which i think performs similarly to C501 apart from the different position of the LED..
For me, C901 take better video especially in lowlight due to bigger aperture,..
Also due to bigger aperture, C901 has more capability taking more details when there is backlight source,
for example when you take a video of a backlit-curtain in the afternoon,
if you take it with C702, the phone will adjust itself so that more details of the backlight are taken care but the surrounding will get darker.. (sometimes until the curtain color become as dark as black)
with C901, it will also adjust itself, but only a little amount is needed, and both surrounding and backlit area details well preserved compared to C702.
At this rate, even with the use of spot metering will not help.
Picture related, just imagine if it is in video mode, it'll get worst than this.
 |
thesun
Joined: Sep 02, 2009
Posts: 215
PM |
 |
longu123
Joined: Dec 23, 2008
Posts: 7
PM |
 |
thesun
Joined: Sep 02, 2009
Posts: 215
PM |
 |
zide
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM |
@ longu123 and thesun:
Were those photos taken with auto-mode?
|
thesun
Joined: Sep 02, 2009
Posts: 215
PM |
yes, all auto settings including white balance.
you can check the exif data if you want. |
Rookwise
Joined: Mar 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK. Phone:Samsung Galaxy A54 5
PM |
Had my C901 for 3 days now
and i'm liking it a lot. The keypad is great for one thing. Soon as I get chance i'll be posting some pictures up as well.
This message was posted from a C901 |
|
|
Posted: 2009-09-27 11:24
