| Author |
C510 & C702 Cyber-shot CCD |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
could you give me a sample in lowlight with nor without LED.
I give you a new camdriver there, see page1 but it is for C702 only for a while....sharpness decrease a little in auto scene. |
|
|
mitunpaul
Joined: Apr 09, 2009
Posts: 4
PM |
See these photos. Taken with C510 cam.
1st one is under daylight. 2nd one is in low light condition using flash LED, and the 3rd one is without using LED.
The last two photos are horrible man. Almost nothing is visible. I had tried in all the modes, but the results are almost same. Plz do something.
[ This Message was edited by: mitunpaul on 2009-04-10 10:23 ] |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
did you think C510 and C702 could take a photos without LED in very lowlight condition???? u've wrong dude. C510 and C702 have a small aperture which can't absorb more light. If you want to take a picture in very lowlight condition please turn on your LED....
Or you could take a shot with stock camdriver first and give your comparisaton between stock camdriver and my camdriver in very lowlight condition.....if C510 could do more...i will make a move to make my camdriver more and more.
Please upload your photo..... |
ds934118
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Posts: 43
PM |
These photo is use your camdriver^^
Auto
Twilight
LED
The photo of C702
[ This Message was edited by: ds934118 on 2009-04-11 04:26 ] |
akudan
Joined: Apr 14, 2008
Posts: 97
From: Malaysia
PM |
@code28h4p
lowlight test between stock & your c510 camdriver
c510 stock
your camdriver (i turned off assistlights)
your camdriver (this pic were taken before i switch off assistlight)
your camdriver, lights on
|
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
i didn't have comment yet and maybe have no comment yet, maybe someone with good-eye to analize photos could share their comment.
Now...where's C702 user???? didn't one? |
pakhusin
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Posts: 277
PM |
@code
i guess u should conduct ur own experiment and judge urself.
please compare between N1 3.3Beta camdriver with urs, because up until now, N1's camdriver is the best deal for C702 so far. Stock camdriver is soooo yesterday.
and still, u havent answered my question, are u using laptop screen as reference? Or is it standalone LCD monitor? because there should be huge difference in color processing. Like i said, when laptop screen shows dark, standalone LCD monitor shows greenish color that u wont see on laptop screen, for example, 3rd picture from akudan, it's like a point of view from a predator! only green and dark green!
I guess i'll stick to N1 camdriver for the moment.
|
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
i have use stand alone LCD monitor. somebody have told you this is because over-sharpness setting in my camdriver and this have fixed yet now. i have decrease more sharpness in auto mode to remove that annoying greenish dot. You must have to try my new camdriver (link in post 1).
oh....something that you should now....this is my project corporate with number1 as long as you know....
did you try to use facedetection shot with number1 3.3 beta....there's will be so much annoying yellowish area in your face if you see on your PC monitor....
in my new camdriver this is a sample, i have fixed a little that annoying yellowish at my son's face.
BTW...could we talk on Yahoo Messenger sometimes???????? with malay language if you want....
[ This Message was edited by: code28h4p on 2009-04-11 08:54 ] |
Sprinz
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 5
PM |
@code28h4p
my suggestion is that perharps you can post N1's camdriver for c510 and c702 in your first thread so that others can compare the difference between these 2 drivers instead of comparing with the original driver?
btw, is everyone able to see the full sized picture for n1's vs code's camdriver posted by pakhusin at the first page? cuz nothing happens when i click the picture..
so i guess maybe i should post the links for his full sized pics here:
code-normal metering-flash off
code-spot metering-flash off
n1-normal metering-flash off
n1-spot metering-flash off
hope he wouldn't mind 
[ This Message was edited by: Sprinz on 2009-04-11 10:40 ] |
ds934118
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Posts: 43
PM |
code28h4p
May I chat with you ?
This is my YM : ds934118.
I will ask you many about your camdriver questions.
Camdrvier of you when night shot, some local noise numerous, turn on LED can be become purple
The color is too bright , yellowish will become deep yellow
By the way,with photograph that camdriver of N1 make being noise camdriver little than you,clearer than you too.
[ This Message was edited by: ds934118 on 2009-04-11 10:47 ] |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
@ds
because i didn't have C510 so i can't try for now, thanx for your feedback...maybe fixed camdriver will be release as soon as possible.
about twilight mode in my camdriver, mine will produce more noise than number1 because i have to increase exposure +1, ISO to 125 and shutter speed 1/2 sec (while N1 ISO 100/shutter speed 1 sec). Why i didn't follow N1 to set ISO to 100 and SS to 1 sec, because i hate it while took picture in very lowlight condition + LED, picture will dark.... |
ds934118
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Posts: 43
PM |
I only have C702....Haha~@@!
But I hate noise on photo= 3 =
So,I want the supermode come soon...........
And if ISO is so high,the photo will be bad><
By the way,I know where is indonesia |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
@ds
Hoho...finally you know where Indonesia is.
Forget 'bout supermode function coz it can't implemented on latest cyber-shot phone (read raider's topic).
Bout manual ISO, number1 told me that it is couldn't effective way.
I'll put in N1's camdriver 3.3 beta in first post later plus the latest one he gave me via email (he called it number1&code28h4p beta 2) to give you all some comparison and share your opinion due bring maximal C702's camera performance. |
pakhusin
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Posts: 277
PM |
@code
i tried ur newest camdriver, it's quite acceptable already. but still need some improvements.
i didn't notice it before, sorry ;P
hope u and n1 succeed in this project. |
ds934118
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Posts: 43
PM |
I expect very much!!
Hope you can improving noise........= v =
And I want to get the N1's camdriver Beta 2.
Thank you.
Please send it on YM.
And............
Your son is cute →or daugher!?
Sorry I just a junior high student.
Please excuse me in the impolite place |
|
|
Posted: 2009-04-10 10:22
