Author |
8 megapixel GSM Cameraphone Comparison innov8, pixon, renoir, shiho and .. |
se_dude Joined: Nov 07, 2007 Posts: > 500 PM |
Gimme a break.these C905 pics are nowwhere close to what I have seen here.Please look into the photo thread Mr Abubasim.All the pics are high quality.Even mobile-review stated that it had one of the best cams.The pics in mobile-review are really good.Waiting for gsmarena's opinion. The innov8 pics suck too.If you cant search let me help you.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=15722
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=15725
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=15708
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=15549
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=15706
http://flickr.com/photos/marcusradecker/2977885274/sizes/o/
http://flickr.com/photos/marcusradecker/2977870806/sizes/o/
http://flickr.com/photos/marcusradecker/ |
|
idumbakumar Joined: Oct 01, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: chennai,india. PM |
i saw purple fringing is still there too. right. |
se_dude Joined: Nov 07, 2007 Posts: > 500 PM |
Purple fringing King: innov8
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=15756
All the pics have pathtic purple fringing. |
Radu_91 Joined: Sep 14, 2008 Posts: 201 From: Romania PM |
i think the c905 is the most balanced phone in the test |
idumbakumar Joined: Oct 01, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: chennai,india. PM |
pis***ed off. how much the purple!! white is almost purple. |
Radu_91 Joined: Sep 14, 2008 Posts: 201 From: Romania PM |
the C905 in the test has the R1AA085 firmware which is worse than R1BA030 or newer firmware
[ This Message was edited by: Radu_91 on 2008-11-04 14:34 ] |
AbuBasim Joined: Nov 04, 2005 Posts: > 500 PM |
I guess it's Samsung's turn to have problems with purple fringing now...
The C905 handles color better than the INNOV8 (not as well as the C902 and this is one thing I agree with plankis on) and it seems that SE finally solved the problems with purple fringing they had with the K850 and the C902, but my own preference is on how well a camera handles noise without water coloring out too much detail. With (almost) all camphones using CMOS these days, noise reduction is a must and the photo quality of the camera comes mainly from software and to a much lesser degree from the hardware. And IMHO that's where Samsung is the leader today.
|
se_dude Joined: Nov 07, 2007 Posts: > 500 PM |
I am sure, with the database hackable now,we will see better noise reduction programs as we speak.Btw Abu, did you see the pics by marcusdecker?? Dont you find them commendable??
The pics in the phonearena test have been taken with a prototype firmware btw.. |
AbuBasim Joined: Nov 04, 2005 Posts: > 500 PM |
GSMArena just posted their 8 megapixel shootout with the usual suspects.
Here's one paragraph that echoes what I said in my last posts in this thread:
Samsung i8510 INNOV8 exhibits the best, most mature, image processing. Its results can easily pass for a low end point'n'shoot digicam. SE C905 is not bad either but has some issues with fine detail due to its noise suppression algorithm.
The C905 gets good marks for strong flash and very good camera UI.
_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-11-05 19:52 ] |
|