| Author |
Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902 |
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
Sorry but I don't buy that at all. I've seen much better pics elsewhere. |
|
|
dancingfate
Joined: Sep 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
PM |
On 2008-05-19 17:35:07, NightBlade wrote:
Well, guys, there has been a new firmware release for the C902. Maybe these pics were shot with the old one.
New firmware doesn't guarantee the better camera.
We all experienced that one previously in K850.
The pics from C902 reminds me of K850 : there's still a red-pink conversion and wash out.
Sad but true.
Come on...
Apple iPhone 4, HTC Evo 3D, HTC Sensation, HTC Inspire 4G, HTC Desire S, HTC Wildfire, S001, SO905iCS, T650 (Gold & Green), C901, W800, K660, K700, Beibei (G702), Severine (DEAD) |
larry 68
Joined: Nov 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Have to agree with Rifqi_Aziz, the pic quality is very similar to my K850i |
ljcii
Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 82
PM |
yea. nokia's much better. |
WhiteEye
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
Nokia learns much. SE seems not!
Sony please withdraw Cyber-hot sub-brand from SE! Walkman is much more than enough for SE, lol
from my observations, sometimes it's better off not knowing. |
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
woow...
worst 5MP pictures i have ever seen... WORST.... WORST... |
JiSm
Joined: Nov 08, 2007
Posts: 404
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
|
Apparently you should disable Face detection when not taking a photo of a face! Possibly affecting the sharpness of the pics? Obviously not the colours tho...
"Back in the land of the long white cloud!" |
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
emm.
what about this:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=rec&w=all&q=c902&m=text
photos are unfortunatly 800x600 but the color reproduction is way better than the comparison shots with the 6220
i don't get it... is the comparison is a HEAVILY baised one.... or was their C902 an Early early faulty prototype.... or.... |
cool_hand
Joined: May 03, 2008
Posts: 37
PM |
The words "style over substance" come to mind.
SE really need to step-up, I love my W890i but this would make me buy a Nokia. |
amawanqa
Joined: May 08, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Hornchurch UK & East London SA
PM |
Phone-wise, I dunno what's disappointed me more recently: the rumoured  P5 apparently having the same ol' 208MHz CPU, or seeing how crap these C902 pics are... 
_________________
He who laughs last...thinks slowest.
P1i, Nokia 7600
[ This Message was edited by: amawanqa on 2008-05-19 19:19 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2008-05-22 00:59 ] |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-19 20:10:37, chombos1 wrote:
emm.
what about this:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=rec&w=all&q=c902&m=text
photos are unfortunatly 800x600 but the color reproduction is way better than the comparison shots with the 6220
i don't get it... is the comparison is a HEAVILY baised one.... or was their C902 an Early early faulty prototype.... or....
Guys! That's what I've been telling you about! See the above pictures and you'll notice that the colours are nigh-perfect with the new firmware. |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-19 20:10:37, chombos1 wrote:
emm.
what about this:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=rec&w=all&q=c902&m=text
photos are unfortunatly 800x600 but the color reproduction is way better than the comparison shots with the 6220
i don't get it... is the comparison is a HEAVILY baised one.... or was their C902 an Early early faulty prototype.... or....
Without any comparison, you can not judge those pics.
|
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
On 2008-05-19 20:27:19, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-05-19 20:10:37, chombos1 wrote:
emm.
what about this:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=rec&w=all&q=c902&m=text
photos are unfortunatly 800x600 but the color reproduction is way better than the comparison shots with the 6220
i don't get it... is the comparison is a HEAVILY baised one.... or was their C902 an Early early faulty prototype.... or....
Without any comparison, you can not judge those pics.
you're right.... i'am just comparing the color reproduction.... C902 is still far away from being a Cyber-shot High ender.
[ This Message was edited by: chombos1 on 2008-05-19 19:31 ] |
dualist
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: 98
PM |
These pics were obviously taken with a pre-release firmware and are bound to be poor. New firmware will inevitably improve the camera quality, as it always does with SE phones - there's no debating that.
The bitching in this thread is meaningless - if you recall, the quality of the photos in the K800i pre-release firmware was equally bad. We just need to be patient for a few months' for SE to perfect their camera drivers.
The only real topic worthy of discussion is why SE can't get their software right before launching new handsets, rather than their current model of releasing shabby firmware and effectively using their customer to beta-test the bugs out of it.
[ This Message was edited by: dualist on 2008-05-19 19:42 ] |
amawanqa
Joined: May 08, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Hornchurch UK & East London SA
PM |
On 2008-05-19 20:41:00, dualist wrote:
We just need to be patient for a few months' for SE to perfect their camera drivers.
Yeah, and by then the 6220's successor will be out...  LOL.
He who laughs last... thinks slowest.
Nokia 5800, Sony Ericsson P1i, Nokia 7600. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-05-19 18:26
