Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902

Author Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-05-26 10:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
no his just crazy....And he just says that because he haves a k770.Let him dream
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-05-26 10:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-05-23 11:57:33, dualist wrote:
K770i is the same form factor and thickness as the C902, is a Cybershot, and takes superior pictures to the K800i. FACT.

Not FACT but OPINION! But I agree. I prefer the less processed, more natural photos from the K770 compared to the overdone sharpening you see in K800 photos.
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-05-26 14:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
overdone sharpening? well... i... uhm... what?
single_luis
W850 black
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: 20
PM
Posted: 2008-05-26 15:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Well things are made there ... is as simple to say that the Nokia 6220 is better than SE .. since it has flash xeṇn osea with that more quality photos .. at night .. and also the screen is 0.2 inches bigger ... and has GPS ... inportantes are points that a consumer could not Jarl of .. so that the Nokia 6220 wins!

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: single_luis on 2008-05-26 14:44 ]
adnansanni
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM
Posted: 2008-05-26 19:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
We haven’t got the C902 but already talking about the next firmware release……. How pathetic that. After P990i I don’t buy the firmware things. If some phone is capable to something then it capable from start like K800, K810, W850 etc not the P990i, K850i etc.
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-05-26 19:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-05-26 14:30:50, Raiderski wrote:
overdone sharpening? well... i... uhm... what?

Look at this post for a comparison of the K800 with another camphone (D900).
adnansanni
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM
Posted: 2008-05-26 19:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@ single_luis, all the phones you have kept at a time?
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-05-27 00:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
AbuBasim
it's not a secret that K800 sucks in low light photos. of course it sucks because of so called "software engineers" which don't know what camera driver programming means. all i can say is that potential of the K800 camera is huge even in low light (i miss led), however driver must not be created by SE engineers also without 1000 pages of documentation. proofs? peace of cake, shots from K800 and hard modded camdriver

auto
http://img389.imageshack.us/img389/2658/dsc03575iw2.jpg

short enhanced mode
http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/6813/dsc03576du0.jpg
(EXIF says exposure time 4/3? another bug by SE, real value is 3/4)

enhanced mode
http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/5070/dsc03577un5.jpg
Sony α
T650 Green
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: LDN/TYO
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-05-27 00:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@Raiderski

Eugh, that 'Auto' shot is so noisy it makes the Tokyo street outside my window seem quiet!!!

However, the last image is somewhat impressive - although, the T650i (which is what I can comment on regarding the K770i) - does produce some great colours, is more vivid then the K800i - although, the K800i is far superior as an all round Camera phone...
Sony Alpha.

imaging.like.no.other
Mige
T610
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Posts: 453
PM
Posted: 2008-05-27 01:00
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I prefer the C902

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: Mige on 2008-05-27 00:01 ]
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-05-27 05:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-05-27 00:35:01, Sony α wrote:
although, the T650i (which is what I can comment on regarding the K770i) - does produce some great colours, is more vivid then the K800i - although, the K800i is far superior as an all round Camera phone...

Yes, and when comparing the K770 with the K800 there's a huge difference in build quality. The creaking from my K770 make me miss home. We don't get any snow here in Muscat but the creaking reminds me of the noise you get when walking on new powdery snow back home in Sweden. And I can't a way to make it stop. In my old P990 I just put a small piece of folded paper but this doesn't work on the K770.
Radiux399
T650 Blue
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM
Posted: 2008-05-28 03:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-05-27 00:21:01, Raiderski wrote:
AbuBasim
it's not a secret that K800 sucks in low light photos. of course it sucks because of so called "software engineers" which don't know what camera driver programming means. all i can say is that potential of the K800 camera is huge even in low light (i miss led), however driver must not be created by SE engineers also without 1000 pages of documentation. proofs? peace of cake, shots from K800 and hard modded camdriver

auto
http://img389.imageshack.us/img389/2658/dsc03575iw2.jpg

short enhanced mode
http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/6813/dsc03576du0.jpg
(EXIF says exposure time 4/3? another bug by SE, real value is 3/4)

enhanced mode
http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/5070/dsc03577un5.jpg




Its amazing just how much better photo's the K800 can take with a modded camdriver. The problem is, it took hackers to achieve this picture quality. SE should have been the ones to improve on its own camera, not other people with a drive to fix SE's mistakes.

And so its my opinion that when comparing two phones (ex. K800 and K770), it only makes sense to compare them with STOCK camera drivers, since thats what 99% of the population is going to be using. And in that case, the K770i tends to perform better than the K800.
unlock26
K850 Blue
Joined: Mar 04, 2004
Posts: 43
From:
PM
Posted: 2008-06-26 11:18
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Some photos taken by 6220 classic:










Video sample: http://media.putfile.com/graffiti-utst-llning

[ This Message was edited by: unlock26 on 2008-06-26 10:37 ]
jhayms
K810 Blue
Joined: Apr 17, 2008
Posts: 105
PM
Posted: 2008-06-26 15:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
fact (sad to admit coz im SEphone user): Stock to Stock Camera....... Nokia is far better than SE phones.
-----------------------------
k810i-r8ba024 | Raiderski's Camdriver | Rakista's Acoustic
unlock26
K850 Blue
Joined: Mar 04, 2004
Posts: 43
From:
PM
Posted: 2008-06-27 23:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
3 More from my 6220 classic..






Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic