| Author |
N1™ 3.05 SM, Camdriver for k790/k800/k810/k818 & N1™ 2.5 Final camdriver1 for /k800/k810. |
claypot
Joined: May 02, 2008
Posts: 45
From: North Borneo
PM |
On 2008-07-03 07:54:39, deadman4168 wrote:
what did i need to do to use the normal effects like sepia....
just go to "negative" effect and use joystick to choose (scroll to left or right..i forgot) please read the readme first
anyway,number1 can u show as the c902 performance on flash...
_________________
K810i R8BA024
Mid Extreme Bass Clarity Acoustic (HPM70)
Withan V3 Rev.1 Camdriver
Custom Blue Menu + Aquawave Theme
~Land Below The Wind~
[ This Message was edited by: claypot on 2008-07-03 07:51 ] |
|
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
c702 VS K800
c702: R3BA035 , standard camdriver
K800: k810 R8BA024, camdriver N1 3.05
artifical light, all auto mode no settings changed
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00100.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00101.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00079.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00082.jpg
very low light, all auto mode no settings changed
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00091.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00096.jpg
very low light, twilight landscape no settings changed
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00093.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00095.jpg
outdoors, aull auto no settings changed
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00020-1.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00108.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00021.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00110.jpg
|
unforgiven_sh
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
Posts: 176
PM |
it seems that C702 stock driver produces much better colors
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
On 2008-07-03 14:37:51, unforgiven_s wrote:
it seems that C702 stock driver produces much better colors
yep it does but not with artifical light it's adds far too blue. |
igorluk
Joined: Feb 13, 2008
Posts: 5
PM |
k800 is better |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
No! C702i is better  C702i camdriver have better auto mode, but on k800i you must put right exposure manual...
But like C702i have some problems with AF, k800i have more details on pic.
|
unforgiven_sh
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
Posts: 176
PM |
so which SE CyberShot phone has the best camera (or produces the best photos)?
|
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
For me that's k800i but if you know how to manually set right exposure, saturation...
But if you want to point'n'shot for me that's C702i Oh yes and there's and k770i
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/milanche91
Ericsson 628>3210>3310>3410>3510>siemens mc60>K750i>> 2x nokia 6630>>w810i>>K800i+2GB modded to max
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-07-03 15:14 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
yes the k800 would have done alot better if i selected the correct modes on my camdriver, but it still can't beat c702's outdoor and indoor photo quality.
i compared the c702 to a samsung digi cam here
i tweaked the settings on the digicam a bit, custom whitebalance, added sharpness.
c702 is just auto mode
samsung s860 vs c702
samsung:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12745
c702:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12746
[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-07-03 15:50 ] |
YG2008
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Posts: 6
PM |
C702 is less sensitive ( or more noise) than K800 due to smaller sensor size.
K800 got heavier noise reduction (more artifact) than C720. |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
The c702 has less/different noise reduction hence more noise more detail. |
ssnopyybg
Joined: Jan 05, 2008
Posts: 65
PM |
At 'indoor' i think that k800 is beter , but outdoor c702 beat him  give some macro test
[ This Message was edited by: ssnopyybg on 2008-07-04 15:19 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
i comparad the macro's
c702 VS K800 macros
c702: R3BA035 , standard camdriver
K800: k810 R8BA024, camdriver N1 3.05
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00001.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00027.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00002-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00025.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00001-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00023.jpg
__________________________________________________________
c702 skinned mediaplayer taken with my k800
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12856 |
faifer13
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Posts: 1
PM |
when i record video with my k790 and i play this see three vertical lines, with other versions of camdrivers not, please what i do |
obentou
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 364
From: Toronto
PM |
Wow, the C702 camera is a lot better, and what I would call "real" 3.2MP. The K800 just looks like crap and smudged compared to the C702. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-03 08:49
