| Author |
Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot discussion |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
Found some photos with C702i 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/virgilefontaine/page10/
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-05-03 21:35 ] |
|
|
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
I totally forgot about this. I was actually considering the W890 but dont intend to use the walkman feature as i already have an ipod so just wanted a nice small but sturdy phone that has a good battery, is good for texting and takes nice pics. So I guess I should really be looking at this baby right? Dont get me wrong the C902 looks nice but i dont like the camera lens cover system or the touch senseitive button.
Can anyone confirm if the C702 is running on A200 platform? And its definatley 2.2 inch screen?
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: bavlondon2 on 2008-05-03 21:45 ] |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-03 22:45:06, bavlondon2 wrote:
Can anyone confirm if the C702 is running on A200 platform? And its definatley 2.2 inch screen?
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: bavlondon2 on 2008-05-03 21:45 ]
Yes and yes. |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Nice one nightblade. I think I have found my next phone. And its price on play is listed as £249 for release. GSMArena also says its pic quality is generally above the K810.
One thing I dont get though if the C series is the new cybershot then why isnt both the 702 and 902 using a xenon flash?
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-03 22:58:42, bavlondon2 wrote:
One thing I dont get though if the C series is the new cybershot then why isnt both the 702 and 902 using a xenon flash?
1) So that they can be more affordable.
2) Because they aren't flagships.
Oh, and you're welcome. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-05-03 23:05:28, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-03 22:58:42, bavlondon2 wrote:
One thing I dont get though if the C series is the new cybershot then why isnt both the 702 and 902 using a xenon flash?
1) So that they can be more affordable.
2) Because they aren't flagships.
Oh, and you're welcome.
you wrong.
c902 is the very new flagship (and second also c702)
c902 CANT use any xenon flash because they are to thin. (xenon flash need thicker space). thats why  use this new "photo LED flash"
c702 seems to have the same excellent sensor as k810/k800. it produce similar quality. thats nice. but but, K850 will still be better with its real xenon flash. (i do miss "face detection" c702 offers. looks very very cool)
_________________
I K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-03 22:17 ] |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
You know technically I reckon this phone is as good in terms of music playback as the w890. Im surprised there are only 3 pages of talk so far for this phone.
It should be released soon right? Is it Q2 or Q3?
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-03 23:10:11, plankgatan wrote:
On 2008-05-03 23:05:28, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-03 22:58:42, bavlondon2 wrote:
One thing I dont get though if the C series is the new cybershot then why isnt both the 702 and 902 using a xenon flash?
1) So that they can be more affordable.
2) Because they aren't flagships.
Oh, and you're welcome.
you wrong.
c902 is the very new flagship (and second also c702)
c902 & c702 & g900 CANT use any xenon flash because they are to thin. (xenon flash need thicker space). thats why use this new "photo LED flash"
Nope, you're wrong. The C902 is just an alternative 5MP phone (to the K850).
What you're right about is that C902 is too thin for a xenon flash, but the C702 isn't. But still they haven't incorporated a Xenon flash because it would make it more expensive.
Also, the G900 doesn't have a photo flash, but a regular LED one.
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-05-03 22:21 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
as i know se, til xmas for sure
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-03 23:11:05, bavlondon2 wrote:
It should be released soon right? Is it Q2 or Q3?
It's sooner than you think.
May. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i read on a blog that both c902 & c702 didnt have the space for a xenon flash. thats why put the new photo LED flash
it kind a strange anyway. c902 is 10mm. c702 is 15mm. k810 and k850 is 17mm. maybe is this extra 2mm who needs
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-03 22:21 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
so k850 is still a better option then? xenon flash and bigger screen ( as i recall )
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-03 23:20:39, BobaFett wrote:
so k850 is still a better option then? xenon flash and bigger screen ( as i recall )
In terms of specs, yes. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i will stay with k850 (no surprise there) untill "K860" comes.
he he he
ps. c702 have actaully same size on the screen as k850. 2.2 inch. so thats good
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-03 22:29 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
funny, so its a step back then... reading the specs again, se gonna launch the same specs as in the last 2 years, so why to rename a series and launch the "same" fone under a new name then?
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-05-03 22:34
