| Author |
k770 vs k810i - Camera quality |
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Vipera drop it.............move on.And if k770 is so good why are you still having a k750?
[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2008-03-23 21:14 ] |
|
|
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
because i wait for real upgrade to next SE imaging flagship device, with decent picture quality
OnePlus 8 |
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Well in one way i agree with you.........Maybe K850 is not what everybody expected but is the best cameraphone from SE at the moment.....and one of the best on the market....And i also agree that SE should step the things up(get to a new level ) so they can defeat nokia in the camera and construction department.....And anyway K800/k810 is still better than the k770....still better allaround camera
[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2008-03-23 21:30 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-03-23 22:14:00, Luci'sPower wrote:
Vipera drop it.............move on.And if k770 is so good why are you still having a k750?
[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2008-03-23 21:14 ]
he he he.....luci dont bother. he dosent understand that example  new c902/g900 (new C-serie 5 M.P cybershoot flagships) will even take worse pics then k850, k810, k770.......
he just a sad fellow who think his 4 years old k750 have better pic-quality then the rest of cybershoot family..
_________________
I K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-03-23 21:41 ] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
@plankgatan:
Anyway C702 beats K810/K800 camera according to GSMArena's test  and tbh in all aspects of imaging except the absense of xenon flash, C702 overthrows K800/K810  C902 just needs a little better post processing algorithm and for sure will beat K850 hands down
10 years at Esato |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10672
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10673
you can see the full size original pics.
[addsig] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
I bought the soft black K770i and here's a quick comparison of just one photo from it with one from my old i-mobile 902. Both shot in 3 MP mode with WB set to Fluorescent (as we use "tubelets" instead of light bulbs in our flat):
Sony Ericsson K770i
i-mobile 902
|
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
K770 performs quite well for a CMOS phone cam - IMO.
besides, i-mobile 902 is just unbeatable.
[addsig] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-03-28 10:16:53, Amras wrote:
K770 performs quite well for a CMOS phone cam - IMO.
besides, i-mobile 902 is just unbeatable.
I wish SE's Cyber-shot software could allow adjusting sharpness. Here's a 800x600 center crop from one of my favorite photos from a 2 MP CMOS camphone, the i-mate JASJAM (HTC TyTN):
(Original here.)
The TyTN's camera software was by default tuned for extremely high sharpness producing very poor photos. But if you turned down sharpness to the absolute minimum then you got photos like the one above.
|
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
I see. I think I understand what you mean and i agree that too much sharpening will cost a lot of details loss in a pic. |
ACDC88
Joined: Apr 12, 2008
Posts: 6
From: Serbia
PM |
I also can't decide between K800i and K770i... I saw some camera comparations on mobile-reviews and k800i beat k770 there. But here, things look different. Is it possible that K770i had old firmware (prototype)? Is that why pictures there was way better on k800? Here is the link:
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-k770-en.shtml |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-04-12 04:04:41, ACDC88 wrote:
I also can't decide between K800i and K770i... I saw some camera comparations on mobile-reviews and k800i beat k770 there. But here, things look different. Is it possible that K770i had old firmware (prototype)? Is that why pictures there was way better on k800? Here is the link:
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-k770-en.shtml
I can slightly say that they just didn't know how to shoot well with k770.
Look nokialovera's gallery in Esato. It's amazing.
Or you can see these pages I made. In Indonesian btw, but I'm sure you still can understand the main frame of the review.
http://forum.wgaul.com/showthread.php?t=68196
[addsig] |
ACDC88
Joined: Apr 12, 2008
Posts: 6
From: Serbia
PM |
I can slightly say that they just didn't know how to shoot well with k770.
Look nokialovera's gallery in Esato. It's amazing.
Or you can see these pages I made. In Indonesian btw, but I'm sure you still can understand the main frame of the review.
http://forum.wgaul.com/showthread.php?t=68196
Tnx m8! K770 then!
Cheers!!! |
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
On 2008-04-12 04:04:41, ACDC88 wrote:
I also can't decide between K800i and K770i... I saw some camera comparations on mobile-reviews and k800i beat k770 there. But here, things look different. Is it possible that K770i had old firmware (prototype)? Is that why pictures there was way better on k800? Here is the link:
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-k770-en.shtml
The camera on the K770i used in that review was actually defective. If you look closely, the top half of all the pictures taken by the K770 in infinite focus are blurry. My T650i had the same problem and others have experienced this as well. Its a defective camera lens, and its a shame really because people reading that review probably got the impression that the K770i takes horrible pictures, when thats really not true! |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-04-12 12:03:00, ACDC88 wrote:
I can slightly say that they just didn't know how to shoot well with k770.
Look nokialovera's gallery in Esato. It's amazing.
Or you can see these pages I made. In Indonesian btw, but I'm sure you still can understand the main frame of the review.
http://forum.wgaul.com/showthread.php?t=68196
Tnx m8! K770 then!
Cheers!!!
You're welcome. BTW, the K800's pics are always on the top side. K770's pics are always in the bottom side.
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-03-23 22:14
