Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > k770 vs k810i - Camera quality

Author k770 vs k810i - Camera quality
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-21 17:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-21 12:33:45, plankgatan wrote:
k810 is sooo much better. k810 have better features, Xenon flash, etc. some of this k810 pics looks terrible, im used to much better then that...he he he

when a k770 manage this stuff im convinced
k810 rules baby

You just posted a bunch of resized K810i photos and then say that your phone is the best and ignore all comparisons that show that you're wrong...

A typical post from plankgatan... I bet that you will have nothing to say about the comparisons I posted on the previous page (here) and you will just keep repeating your opinions here and perhaps some more samples from your phone only without of course any comparisons.


On 2008-02-21 06:40:55, mode wrote:
What sensor does the K770 use because from the photo comparisons on the first page, the quality is reminiscent of the CCD sensors SE used to apply.

Hey plankgatan! When was the last time someone mistook the sensor in the K810i for being CCD?

A common tactic by politicians in the West is to repeat lies often enough until people start believing them. Seems that some people try the same tactic while posting online...

_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate


[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-02-21 19:36 ]
Vipera ammodytes
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM
Posted: 2008-02-21 23:10
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
AbuBasim

I agree with you in every word!
WE have coprassion between k770 and k810 and its clear who has better picture quality(k770)

A common tactic by politicians in the West is to repeat lies often enough until people start believing them. Seems that some people try the same tactic while posting online...


true!

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2008-02-21 22:11 ]
rlwafu
D750
Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 8
PM
Posted: 2008-03-23 19:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
IMO: k770 has better picture quality(honestly)....when i bought a phone last January im supposed to buy a phone and im stuck choosing between k810i and k770i...i ended up buying the k770i...one of my basis for buying the k770i is that i dont like the keypad and especially the joystick of the k810i. (SE joysticks for sometime experiences problems in functioning....just like my k750i before and my friend's k800i...they wont go right and up)

[ This Message was edited by: rlwafu on 2008-03-23 18:43 ]
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2008-03-23 21:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
K810 take better landscape, better night pics (xenon flash, etc), better portrait (better details), the only thing k770 maybe is similar of is macro,

k770

k810

K770

k810

k770

k810




_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-03-23 20:37 ]
Vipera ammodytes
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM
Posted: 2008-03-23 22:00
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
OMG you again comparated K770 prototype and k810 (from gsmarena.com)

we have a lot samples from final product, which are far better then k810.... including on this page...


_________________


[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2008-03-23 21:01 ]
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-03-23 22:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Vipera drop it.............move on.And if k770 is so good why are you still having a k750?

[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2008-03-23 21:14 ]
Vipera ammodytes
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM
Posted: 2008-03-23 22:18
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
because i wait for real upgrade to next SE imaging flagship device, with decent picture quality
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-03-23 22:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Well in one way i agree with you.........Maybe K850 is not what everybody expected but is the best cameraphone from SE at the moment.....and one of the best on the market....And i also agree that SE should step the things up(get to a new level ) so they can defeat nokia in the camera and construction department.....And anyway K800/k810 is still better than the k770....still better allaround camera

[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2008-03-23 21:30 ]
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2008-03-23 22:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-03-23 22:14:00, Luci'sPower wrote:
Vipera drop it.............move on.And if k770 is so good why are you still having a k750?

[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2008-03-23 21:14 ]


he he he.....luci dont bother. he dosent understand that example new c902/g900 (new C-serie 5 M.P cybershoot flagships) will even take worse pics then k850, k810, k770.......

he just a sad fellow who think his 4 years old k750 have better pic-quality then the rest of cybershoot family..





_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-03-23 21:41 ]
razec
T610
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2008-03-24 02:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@plankgatan:

Anyway C702 beats K810/K800 camera according to GSMArena's test and tbh in all aspects of imaging except the absense of xenon flash, C702 overthrows K800/K810 C902 just needs a little better post processing algorithm and for sure will beat K850 hands down
10 years at Esato
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-03-24 12:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10672


http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10673


you can see the full size original pics.
[addsig]
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-03-28 09:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I bought the soft black K770i and here's a quick comparison of just one photo from it with one from my old i-mobile 902. Both shot in 3 MP mode with WB set to Fluorescent (as we use "tubelets" instead of light bulbs in our flat):

Sony Ericsson K770i


i-mobile 902


Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-03-28 10:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
K770 performs quite well for a CMOS phone cam - IMO.
besides, i-mobile 902 is just unbeatable. [addsig]
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-03-28 10:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-03-28 10:16:53, Amras wrote:
K770 performs quite well for a CMOS phone cam - IMO.
besides, i-mobile 902 is just unbeatable.

I wish SE's Cyber-shot software could allow adjusting sharpness. Here's a 800x600 center crop from one of my favorite photos from a 2 MP CMOS camphone, the i-mate JASJAM (HTC TyTN):

(Original here.)

The TyTN's camera software was by default tuned for extremely high sharpness producing very poor photos. But if you turned down sharpness to the absolute minimum then you got photos like the one above.
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-03-28 13:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I see. I think I understand what you mean and i agree that too much sharpening will cost a lot of details loss in a pic.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi