Welcome to Esato.com
Posted by zol
Animated screen savers consume battery energy, so I don't like using them. What about non-animated ones? Is the OS program (?) moving the .gif clever enough to save battery in that case?
Posted by Hoonior
Hmmmmm, the whole purpose of a screen saver is to keep an image moving so as not to burn into the screen. I suppose, technically, a non-animated screen saver is called "wallpaper"!!
Posted by zol
> Hmmmmm, the whole purpose of a screen saver is to keep an image
> moving so as not to burn into the screen.
You are right of course - in theory. Look at the screen saver you are using on the P800. How many percentages of the screen is truly moving? All the rest is burning :-)
So, IMHO, in our case the animated screen saver is for fun only - and against battery.
> I suppose, technically, a non-animated screen saver is
> called "wallpaper"!!
Yes, we can call it a full-screen wallpaper. What I ask is whether the still picture consumes battery like the animated one, or not.
Click to view updated thread with images
© Esato.com -
From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum