| Author |
better picture R1A vs. R1J? judge here |
augustborn9917
Joined: Jun 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Uranus
PM |
-2phones
-one is R1a, the other is R1j
-no nightmode, poor lighting
-both macro on
-same focuspoint:HP
-self timer on
choice#1: 
choice#2: 
*limited study only, my friend is leaving on sunday. will try to take more tomorrow in daylight. hopefully the results are consistent......
_________________
my k750 themes
[ This Message was edited by: augustborn9917 on 2005-07-04 11:14 ] |
|
|
gr3gg0
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Posts: 182
From: Toronto, Canada
PM |
2nd...
btw how is one tht much bigger than the other
[ This Message was edited by: gr3gg0 on 2005-07-03 06:17 ] |
mrao
Joined: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Mumbai, India
PM |
The 1st pic seems to be much better than the 2nd one
 t610 > k700i > p800 > p900 > p910 > k750i > I-mate Jam > Blokia 6681 > HTC Prophet > HTC Wizard & Nokia N73 > E71 > BB 9000 > HTC Desire > Samsung Galaxy S > Samsung Galaxy S II & the Motorola Xoom <br /> Still Shiny but not so n |
EastCoastStar
Joined: Dec 07, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: orlando fl US
PM |
i believe the 1st is more clear.
Its good to be back! |
anay
Joined: Sep 17, 2004
Posts: 296
From: London
PM |
Think 1st 1 is better. |
Curve
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 95
From: Cheshire, UK
PM |
They both suck.
Lighting? go take pictures with light! |
Carlsb3rg
Joined: Jun 07, 2003
Posts: 400
From: Kuwait
PM, WWW
|
It's hard to tell, but i think the 1st image is "slightly" sharper, and not "much" better. |
shizznah
Joined: Jul 02, 2005
Posts: 14
PM |
1st but only by a smidgen. |
shizznah
Joined: Jul 02, 2005
Posts: 14
PM |
1st but only by a smidgen. |
augustborn9917
Joined: Jun 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Uranus
PM |
2 phones
-one is R1a, the other is R1j
-full automatic everything
-both default settings
-same focuspoint
-self timer on
R1J:
 
R1A:
 
*poorer pic on R1J is NOT true
[ This Message was edited by: augustborn9917 on 2005-07-04 11:15 ] |
manilabynight
Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Posts: 34
PM |
How about the quality on the R1L002 release which is newer and supposedly more reliable than the R1J version? What's the performance? |
silie
Joined: Jun 16, 2005
Posts: 129
From: philippines
PM |
@augustborn
are you sure about your headings? because i think R1A should have the bigger file size than R1J? |
riffola
Joined: Jun 02, 2005
Posts: 247
From: NYC
PM |
R1J looks nicer if the titles are right.
|
c0rn7
Joined: May 05, 2005
Posts: 6
PM |
yea..they are correct..just checked the EXIF data with ACDSee...also anyone using Opera can check it..right click on image --> image properties
using opera...this is from the 2nd pic for R1J002..
Image input equipment: Sony Ericsson
Image input equipment model: K750i
File change date and time: 2005:07:03 16:14:04
Software: R1J002 prgCXC125955_HONG_KONG_ 0.0
edit: augustborn, just noticed that you stated both are taken using default settings, meaning both pics are taken using Normal picture quality? how about taking both with Fine Quality? i think that would be a better comparison, considering most would take pics with Fine Quality 
[ This Message was edited by: c0rn7 on 2005-07-04 07:05 ] |
vd0t
Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 68
From: Vancouver
PM |
awesome test!
proves alot of ppl wrong about the new cam software..
btw.. the titles r rite.. the firmware version can be found in the properties of each picture (in mac anyways)
just waitin for SE to fix the video prob then ill update from r1a |
|
|
Posted: 2005-07-03 07:10
t610 > k700i > p800 > p900 > p910 > k750i > I-mate Jam > Blokia 6681 > HTC Prophet > HTC Wizard & Nokia N73 > E71 > BB 9000 > HTC Desire > Samsung Galaxy S > Samsung Galaxy S II & the Motorola Xoom 
