| Author |
Nuclear Powered mobiles In the Works |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
Via: cellular-news
Cellphones powered by nuclear power could be not too many years away following developments by scientists at the University of Rochester. The details of the technology which uses radioactive gasses, already licensed to BetaBatt, appears in this month's issue of Advanced Materials.
Betavoltaics, the method that the new battery uses, has been around for half a century, but its usefulness was limited due to its low energy yields. Similar to the way solar panels work by catching photons from the sun and turning them into current, the science of betavoltaics uses silicon to capture electrons emitted from a radioactive gas, such as tritium, to form a current.
The new battery technology makes its successful gains by dramatically increasing the surface area where the current is produced. Instead of attempting to invent new, more reactive materials, Fauchet's team focused on turning the regular material's flat surface into a three-dimensional one.
Part of the problem is that as particles in the tritium gas decay, half of them shoot out in a direction that misses the silicon altogether. It's analogous to the sun's rays pouring down onto the ground, but most of the rays are emitted from the sun in every direction other than at the Earth. Fauchet decided that to catch more of the radioactive decay, it would be best not to use a flat collecting surface of silicon, but one with deep pits.
A layer of silicon riddled with pits, each of which would fill with the radioactive tritium gas, would be like dropping the sun into a deep well lined with solar panels. Almost all of the sun's rays, no matter which way they were emitted, would strike a well wall. Only those rays that fired straight up and out of the well would be lost. With this reasoning, Fauchet devised a method to excavate pits into a microscopic piece of silicon.
The pits, or wells, are only about a micron wide (about four ten-thousandths of an inch), but are more than 40 microns deep. After the wells are "dug" with an etching technique, their insides are coated with a material to form a p-n junction just a tenth of a micron thick, which is the best thickness to induce a current. The Advanced Materials paper details how these wells were dug in a random fashion, yielding a 10-fold increase in current over the conventional design. The team is already working on a technique to create and line the wells in a much more uniform, lattice formation that should increase the energy produced by as much as 160-fold over current technology.
"Our ultimate design has roughly 160 times the surface area of the conventional, flat design," says Fauchet. "We expect to be able to get an efficiency that very nearly matches, and we're doing this using standard semiconductor industry fabrication techniques." www.americanantigravity.com
[addsig] |
|
|
drdeepankar
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 86
From: India
PM |
Er..There obviously wouldn't be any mention about any potential radiation hazards? Especially, since the science is in a very early stage? |
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
I'm not surprised! Really! This was only a matter of time! Hope this thing takes off. Will be a boon to wap nerds like me! 
T230 >> T610 >> Ngage QD >> N73 >> N85 >> Omnia HD >> And countless other review units |
tranquil
Joined: Dec 15, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: Oslo, Norway
PM |
SAR will be peanut compared to this. 
|
mario2002
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jeffrey's-Bay ,South Africa
PM, WWW
|
Buddy is not really a nuclear reaction per-se . No nuclear splitting nor melting/combining takes place.The idea is indeed good,the problem seem to be in finding the material 'unobtainium' to atle the battery with.Is not of much use to find a fuel for your motorcar which gives you 100000 miles per gallon,while it corrodes/destroyes the fuel container/engine after 3days :-( All what they figured not is how to increase the efficiency but the matterialls used are no better then 50years ago.
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650 |
drdeepankar
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 86
From: India
PM |
So, we wait :[? |
Residentevil
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Raccoon City, USA
PM, WWW
|
We just have to wait a few more years to see where this is going.
Tough times don't last, tough people do!
Free Tibet |
jeko.uk
Joined: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: south east london
PM |
these nuclear batterys are gonna last for weeks
|
Gigs
Joined: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The planet Snibertron!
PM, WWW
|
Instead of antenna we'll have little cooling towers that occasionally let off steam.. 
|
govigov
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM |
i will not touch this with a barge pole
|
drdeepankar
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 86
From: India
PM |
As far as i know, anything with the word 'nuclear' attached to it is in fact a reactor- big, small or whatever, unless its a reactor, it wont produce power.
Failing to prepare.....is preparing to fail. |
antocsm
Joined: Feb 10, 2005
Posts: 65
PM |
Possible effects on the Enviroment ? Effects on the human body? Or will the phones end up in lead casing.
This message was posted from a T230 |
mario2002
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jeffrey's-Bay ,South Africa
PM, WWW
|
Read my post again.This uses beta radiation ! ! ! Not gama ! What do you want the lead for ? Also no nuclear reactions occure.Please refrain from commenting if you don't know what you talk about ! Is the right thing to do otherwise you may end up posting a stupid comment.
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650 |
drdeepankar
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 86
From: India
PM |
Yes, lets all read the previous posts, especially the first one, which mentions the use of some Radioactive Gas.  Beta is absolutely, 100% safe?
Failing to prepare.....is preparing to fail. |
bluesign2k
Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Posts: 73
From: Birmingham, UK
PM |
No, Beta particles are not 100% safe as they are essentially high energy electrons, and so can be very ionising and can travel a few feet in air. However, due to the fact that they are electrons, they are also very easy to stop, by using a thin sheet of metal or similar...so basically they shoulnd leave the battery case. So they should be safe as long as you dont dismantle the battery.
And for the comment about reactors...yes it would be a kind of reactor...but dont think of it as a power station type reactor as there is no chain reaction and no nutrons relesed in the decay...that would just be silly in a phone!!! |
|
|
Posted: 2005-05-26 18:50
