| Author |
Sagem VS1: a very simple low end phone |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
Sagem has this new mobile phone for Vodafone without a camera, supports only basic features for calling and texting.
[addsig] |
|
|
Ing. FijoK
Joined: Sep 11, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Prague, Czech Republic
PM, WWW
|
sorry but 
I saw the man who can change my destiny... He stood in the mirror. |
mustafabay
Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Egypt
PM |
So now vodafone is pushing Sagem as their main phone not sharp?
This message was posted from a T630 |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
I wouldnt go as far as to say that its their main phone!....its just a budget payg deal.
[addsig] |
uthetha ituvi
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Posts: 47
From: East London, both in SA & UK!
PM |
With an all-new, metallic sanitary pad shape....joy!!
He who laughs last, thinks slowest... |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
I didn't see anything mentioned that suggest sagem was anything more than a basic phone for vodafone and no mention of it replacing sharp, not that sharp has really featured much lately in vodafones line up.
Really the Sharps have just been one of many on offer since most manufacturers are bowing to Vodafone's wishes for customised software
|
Cycovision
Joined: Nov 30, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM, WWW
|
I think it's a good idea to release a phone like that. Not everyone needs the feature set that you get on most new phones these days.
I bet it's very easy to use and doesn't go wrong very often, if at all. Those two things could be seen as very attractive features to many people 
Your right though, it does look rather like a feminine hygiene product 
|
fatreg
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
looks like a DECT home phone!!
basic features? such as a NK1100??
fatreg
|
jeko.uk
Joined: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: south east london
PM |
its bloody disgusting |
brix25
Joined: Aug 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Cape Town, South Africa
PM, WWW
|
@uthetha: It kinda has a close resemblance to a sanitary pad...damn, who would've thought.
Liar liar pants on fire/ You burning up like David Koresh- Ghostface Killah |
uthetha ituvi
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Posts: 47
From: East London, both in SA & UK!
PM |
Hi brix!
A close contest between this one and Nokia's similarly sanitary-styled 2650..the flexi-wings flip-phone.
I'll leave it at that...
Come on Sagem!After much better looking Sagems like the myX-7 and myX-8 over the past year,now this!?(even if this is a budget phone!)
He who laughs last, thinks slowest... |
govigov
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM |
Why not just pick up a nokia 3310? Imo it is the best phone for calls and texting.
This message was posted from a K500 |
mrao
Joined: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Mumbai, India
PM |
Or the SE T105...which is a call & texting phone but scores way above the 3310 ( and definitely over this one  ) in looks & size.
 t610 > k700i > p800 > p900 > p910 > k750i > I-mate Jam > Blokia 6681 > HTC Prophet > HTC Wizard & Nokia N73 > E71 > BB 9000 > HTC Desire > Samsung Galaxy S > Samsung Galaxy S II & the Motorola Xoom <br /> Still Shiny but not so n |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
Or how about the  K300 for a basic entry level phone?
[addsig] |
batesie
Joined: Feb 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
yep K300 any day over a sagem
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2005-04-25 21:29
t610 > k700i > p800 > p900 > p910 > k750i > I-mate Jam > Blokia 6681 > HTC Prophet > HTC Wizard & Nokia N73 > E71 > BB 9000 > HTC Desire > Samsung Galaxy S > Samsung Galaxy S II & the Motorola Xoom 
