Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Symbian phones > SE P910 vs Qtek S100

1234  Next
Author SE P910 vs Qtek S100
Thx1138
P910
Joined: Sep 29, 2004
Posts: 8
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 04:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Howdy!

Feel free to have your oppiniun:

http://www.slatthogflyers.se/compare.jpg
or download specification here:
http://www.qtek.nu/files/Produktblad%20Qtek%20S100.pdf



[ This Message was edited by: Thx1138 on 2005-01-04 04:04 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Thx1138 on 2005-01-04 04:05 ]
govigov
K500
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 04:06
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Can you pls list the specs of the 2nd phone here?

This message was posted from a K500

lor
P910
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Planet Bob
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 04:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
It's the XDA Mini.
dancingfate
K700
Joined: Sep 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 05:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Qtek S100 is better than P910i for the following :

Processor: 416 MHz (P910i AMR 156 MHz i think...)
Connectivity : plus mini USB
Size: shorther, thiner and lighter
Camera: 1.3 MP
OS : Windows Mobile with Windows Media Player is cool...

The only good in SE P910i is 262K colors...

Yes, that Qtek looks like O2 XDA II Mini...
Apple iPhone 4, HTC Evo 3D, HTC Sensation, HTC Inspire 4G, HTC Desire S, HTC Wildfire, S001, SO905iCS, T650 (Gold & Green), C901, W800, K660, K700, Beibei (G702), Severine (DEAD)
lor
P910
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Planet Bob
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 05:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
You also forgot to mention that windows mobile devices need a lot of ram and processing power just to run a few applications and that's not the case for the p910i which is why it's quite comfortable with it's processor.


govigov
K500
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 06:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Hmmm... The cam in the other phone is good.

This message was posted from a K500

j_0_e
P910
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Posts: 45
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 13:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
the s100 seems better in spec....... but when u look @ it in the long run, it wont be able to have all the software and stuff we have on our p910i's. it probs wont get popular enough to have what we get

agreed?
masseur
P910
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 14:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
as some of you probably know, I am using the i-mate JAM as my primary phone now. The JAM is just another name for the Qtek S100 or HTC magician, or o2 XDA compact etc etc.

As a prior P800/P900/P910i user this phone suits me because it does have all the power you need, runs all the latest pocketpc software (which is great because I can run all that I use on my iPAQ), including worldmate, avantgo etc etc. There is also alot more free and shareware available for this platform

its windows mobile 2003 SE so it provides landscape mode natively

it has an SDIO slot so extra memory is cheaper and I can plug an SD wifi card into it.

Sizewise it sits on my belt much less obtrusively than the P910 ever did.

pocket internet explorer has always been far superior to the built in P910 browser.

as an outlook user on my pc synchronisation works flawlessly

I use microsoft autoroute on my pc and they provide a pocketpc version which works great so I carry maps of where I am going all the time. thats not easy to do on the p series

the camera is 1.3MP and it does take good pictures and video but to be honest considering the P910 is 0.3MP the 1.3MP isn't really 3 or 4 times better as you might expect.

messaging works better in my opinon, especially MMS.

I could rave on and on with more stuff as to why I have swapped my P910 for this device but that will do for starters and you'll have to wait for my review (one day)

edit: in summary as an avid pocketpc user this is what I have been waiting for its just that previous pocketpc phones have been too big for my taste

_________________
Unless I'm very much mistaken...
my reviews: V800 K700i (coming soon: V3, JAM)

[ This Message was edited by: masseur on 2005-01-04 13:12 ]
.Z.
P1
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Posts: 214
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 14:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Looks very nice indeed...

When my P900 is worn out i may be looking at Qtek!
.Z.
P1
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Posts: 214
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 15:06
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
One question.

My hearing isn't so good, how is the sound in S100 against P900?
masseur
P910
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 15:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
again, comparing with the JAM, the sound is very clear if a little hollow.

Some people are complaining about distortion and on the CompactJam forum in this thread there is a link to this thread on the XDA developers site suggesting there might be some patch to improve it.

for me it sounds pretty good and I had no complaints before reading all that
Thx1138
P910
Joined: Sep 29, 2004
Posts: 8
PM
Posted: 2005-01-04 23:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Howdy,

If someone did not notice, the screen is bigger on S100:
320x240 vs 320x208

http://www.pricerunner.com/



[ This Message was edited by: Thx1138 on 2005-01-04 22:39 ]
csr120
T68 gold
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Posts: 2
PM
Posted: 2005-01-05 20:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Pocket Internet Explorer browser has dissapointed me,though because there are on the net some multiforms in which the drop down boxes input is not remembered when you go to the next part of the multiform. Also , the INBOX and COMPOSE buttons cannot be accessed through the web interface with the Pocket Internet Explorer + you cannot save individualy the pics of a web page .

This message was posted from a WAP device

hippo
P910
Joined: Mar 15, 2003
Posts: 111
PM
Posted: 2005-01-07 00:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@masseur,

This is interesting indeed. I hope you do one of your reviews of this device sooner or later. Meanwhile a "couple" of questions in case you are feeling communicative:

1) What is the sound quality like, listening to mp3 files on the S100? I use the P910 for this a lot.

2) Even as a P-series afficionado, the P910/outlook sync makes me want to throw the P910 out of the window almost every day. Sounds as though you might also have found this. Is it really that good with the S100?

3) How do you cope with the slow-down of not having the qwerty keyboard and going back to the stylus? I reckon I can keep up with most blackberry users on my P910.

4) Do you know if there's a BlackBerry client for the S100? Have you tried it?

5) Ever run out of working memory?

6) How's the wi-fi?

7) More importantly (for me), how's the bluetooth? Does it work properly with a BT headset (STILL not right on the P910)?

8) Hmmm no phone keypad for SMS?

That's all for now...!

[ This Message was edited by: hippo on 2005-01-06 23:56 ]
blue8300
K750
Joined: Sep 01, 2003
Posts: 471
PM
Posted: 2005-01-21 18:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2005-01-04 13:43:25, j_0_e wrote:
the s100 seems better in spec....... but when u look @ it in the long run, it wont be able to have all the software and stuff we have on our p910i's. it probs wont get popular enough to have what we get

agreed?



Agreed?? not really... lol
I think you will even get more software there it's a PPC and can use all compatible software you see
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi