| Author |
Nokia 6600 or SE K700i - help! |
datx
Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 130
From: Portugal
PM, WWW
|
Hello all, i have this same doubt between SE k700i and nokia 6600, i've read the major opinions, but i want u guys, that know about this stuff, to tell me something..
Is k7's screen really bigger than 6600's one? Because, in all sites i read that SE has 176x220 and Nokia 176x208, but seeing this picture, http://www.mobile88.com/gen/photos/sonyericsson/k700/k700i_a.jpg , i got confused. Can anyone answer me?  |
|
|
50Cent
Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: ...whatever psycho!!!
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-12-01 08:46:03, blackspot wrote:
N6230 - large clear screen! 
|
|
haha... in response to the question of the thread. I would choose the 6600, purely for the MMC capability. If i was going for size and tyle it would be the K700! 
Trusted Trader: 50Cent (+6, -0)
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
I guess the 'only' advantage of the Nokia 6600 is it's - MMC, nothing else  ! 41 MB of space will surely suffice even if you are an IMAGE or VIDEO - freak ! |
FutureDesign
Joined: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 317
From: Queensland, Australia
PM |
I like the 6600s camera design :nD but wuld go wit the 6600 cuz im a sucka for big screens
This message was posted from a Nokia |
vanquish
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Wor Newcastle Phone: V600i
PM, WWW
|
I don't think they are of the same level, but the Nokia would be a nice choice.
I think it comes down to whether you want to stick with  or turn to the dark side 
All the features are pretty similair to compare much!
[addsig] |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@vanquish - Dark side is good, specially at - night  ! |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-12-15 23:08:27, datx wrote:
Hello all, i have this same doubt between SE k700i and nokia 6600, i've read the major opinions, but i want u guys, that know about this stuff, to tell me something..
Is k7's screen really bigger than 6600's one? Because, in all sites i read that SE has 176x220 and Nokia 176x208, but seeing this picture, http://www.mobile88.com/gen/photos/sonyericsson/k700/k700i_a.jpg , i got confused. Can anyone answer me?
|
|
176x220 vs 176x208 are the number of pixels of the screen - the resolution - not the physical size. The N6600 screen is physically bigger than the screen of the K700, but have fewer pixels (dots)
You can say that the K700 screen are sharper because it has a higher pixeldensity - it has more pixels on a smaller physical area.
Compare it with a computermonitor
You can have a 15" monitor with a resolution set at 1024x768 or you could have a 17" monitor with a resolution set at 800x600 |
datx
Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 130
From: Portugal
PM, WWW
|
oh , i see, thanks a lot, but one more thing, i've heard that the SE k700i's camera is worse than the N 6660, is this true? |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@datx - Glad to have you on-board mate  If the resolution is what you are asking here, I guess - NOT! The cam features of the K700i is at it's - BEST too. Having all those: sizes, color types, zooming effects etc. is all you would just be looking for a fone with a nice cam features - I guess |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
no thats definately not true. The N6600 cam is a first generation VGA mobile cam and not especially good.
under good lightingconditions (outdoors, sunny) - the k700 propably has the best VGA cam of all mobile VGA cams - but under poor lightingconditions (indoors, lowlight) its not good - N6230 for instance handles lowlight pictures better. Mobile VGA cams are not very advanced and lack the possibility to adjust properly for different conditions. From the manufacturer it can be adjusted to perform equally good (or equally bad - depends on how you look at it) under most normal conditions, but then it wont perform max under any condition. Or the manufacturer can adjust it to perform as good as possible under a specific condition - but then it wont perform as good under other conditions. The K700 is adjusted to perform under best possible conditions - thus being one of the best under these conditions - but not as good under less conditions.
Hope it makes any sence.
Under any circumstances - VGA mobile cams - are only VGA mobile cams - so dont expect miracles 
here are some examples of pictures Ive taken with the K700
http://spawnweb.dk/k700photos/
http://spawnweb.dk/k700slideshow/
and here are more k700 shots:
http://www.sprites.dk/?page=phone&phone=181
here are some N6600 to compare with:
http://www.sprites.dk/?page=phone&phone=104 |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@therealspawn - You mean the image resolution of the Nokia 6600 is BETTER than that of the K700i mate . . . But cam-features wise, I guess that of the K7 is a stand-out ! |
clank
Joined: Sep 24, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
The k7's camera is definately a better vga camera plus the panaroma option is great+unlimited video recordin. The advantage of the 6600 however are expandable memory and mmc slot(which might be very imp for some) but its big ang bulky(at around 130gm) and not really usable with one hand,screen quality is nowhere near that of k7, very sluggish once you load software, quite unstable(2 of my mates experience frequent hangups and crashes), bad sound and cant be used as bluetooth remote. Also it aint a se and blokia sucks(yup nokia hater here) Priced almost the same as k7 btw. |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-12-16 16:41:58, JN wrote:
@therealspawn - You mean the image resolution of the Nokia 6600 is BETTER than that of the K700i mate . . . But cam-features wise, I guess that of the K7 is a stand-out !
|
|
No I dont
resolution of K700 screen is 176x220 pixels
resolution of N6600 screen is 176x208 pixels
Resolution of the screen is better on K700 - but the screen itself is bigger on the N6600
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@clank & @the realspawn - Many thanks for your replies Those are also what I have in mind . . . |
corylei
Joined: Dec 09, 2004
Posts: 19
PM |
I'm not sure about you, but any decision you have to make between Sony and any other company, regardless of the product, is a decision based on what you value more, features or design.
Sony is a company that has always prioritised the looks of its products over the actual functions and features, so if the design of a phone is important to you, then se is for you. But if the features are more important, than Nokia is perhaps a better option.
I know some of you find Nokia's "beautiful" but they're really not, they're either... squarish ugly things, or have odd-shapes, particularly on the keypad. |
|
|
Posted: 2004-12-15 23:08
