| Author |
is p900 cam better than k700? |
boto43
Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Trnava-Nitra,Pardubice CSSR
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-10-28 18:05:26, gbrooks3 wrote:
apparently there is an app coming out for the P series called Photoacute. it makes the pictures taken by the camera better quality. see for yourself.
http://www.photoacute.com
but this has been speculated about for ages now.
|
|
hm,its good only for nokia phones 
ja cejtim se bejt esatem sk podvedenej  |
|
|
sorac
Joined: Sep 05, 2004
Posts: 41
From: SKlandia - New Mine (present U
PM, WWW
|
guys, i would say, if you wannt to take a good pictures, go and buy a camera.. phone is just for fun.. mms or whallpaper.. 
You'll never get a second chance to change the first impression.  |
ph03n!x
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Madras, India
PM |
@Boto43: P900 has a better cam than the P610- for sure!
@vineeth... i cant agree anymore with u than now  Bhai hai tho Bhai he hai!
...miles to go before I sleep... on the road less travelled by! |
london-uk
Joined: Oct 01, 2003
Posts: 214
From: Londres
PM |
I have both the k700 and the p900. In my opinion, the quality of the k700's cam is better. However, judge for yourself. Have just taken these pics under equal conditions:
k700
New window
p900
New window
[addsig] |
rrojas260
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Valencia, Venezuela
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-10-28 20:17:07, boto43 wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2004-10-28 18:05:26, gbrooks3 wrote:
apparently there is an app coming out for the P series called Photoacute. it makes the pictures taken by the camera better quality. see for yourself.
http://www.photoacute.com
but this has been speculated about for ages now.
|
|
hm,its good only for nokia phones
|
|
No. there is a beta realse for Pxx0
|
ph03n!x
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Madras, India
PM |
@london Uk, looks like we cudda done better with the preferences on the P900....
...miles to go before I sleep... on the road less travelled by! |
london-uk
Joined: Oct 01, 2003
Posts: 214
From: Londres
PM |
Just took the pics in default mode on both phones, no tinkering. Sure you can get a better quality on the p900, however I don't think it is realistic to expect that a user would alter the variances continually depending on the particular settings of a photo opportunity. In my opinion, the test of the cam should be in simply taking the phone out... and snap, take the picture. Not adjusting, altering settings etc. depending on the situation. The nature of a camera on a mobile device at the moment can not be equated to that of e.g. a pro Nikon or similar device
[addsig] |
ph03n!x
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Madras, India
PM |
@rrojas: hey, didnt find any link on the website (or am i drunk?!!) mind givin me a lin for the beta?
@ london Uk: u got it there... n ya, we gotta remember tiz a fone first ...
...miles to go before I sleep... on the road less travelled by! |
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
Here is a thread about Photoacute, it's a bit of an old thread, but it might be interesting to some of you.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
sorac
Joined: Sep 05, 2004
Posts: 41
From: SKlandia - New Mine (present U
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-10-30 02:28:49, london-uk wrote:
I have both the k700 and the p900. In my opinion, the quality of the k700's cam is better. However, judge for yourself. Have just taken these pics under equal conditions:
k700
New window
p900
New window
|
|
there are a big differences between those pictures..
k700 is much better, but still think, best way is to buy a camera for pictures..
You'll never get a second chance to change the first impression. |
|
|
Posted: 2004-10-28 20:17
/ Nokia = 
