| Author |
Pictures & Photos taken with the S700i |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Pictures are much bigger. See spec below for more details: -
 |
|
|
manfran
Joined: Mar 23, 2003
Posts: 289
From: PHILIPPINES
PM |
Is the photo quality comparable with the K700i? Or is it much better? I understand they are both 1.3 mega pixels, right? |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Pictures must be the same as they are 1.3 megapixel.
These pictures do look good in full screen mode. |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
no, the S700 has a true 1.3 megapixel camera whereas the K700 has a 0.3 megapixel camera (VGA) but has software in it that can interpoloate the picture up to 1.2 megapixels.
so you can expect much better quality from the S700 than the K700
|
Skrue
Joined: Dec 15, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
of what i know the s700 has a 1.3mp cam while the k700 supports a 640x480 cam with extended mode making it larger...though not a mp cam..  im just dying for an s700
@peter - too bad for me, no s700 in dubai yet, somehow they're late
This message was posted with a Nokia 5110i with bluetooth, colored and 2.0 megapixel camera |
Krubach
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sunny Portugal! :)
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-09-27 15:06:42, manfran wrote:
Is the photo quality comparable with the K700i? Or is it much better? I understand they are both 1.3 mega pixels, right?
|
|
Wrong. I think the quality is much better in S700 which uses a CCD sensor, where K700 uses a CIF camera sensor.
Besides, K700 is only VGA , having VGA = 640x480, means K700 has a 0.3 MP Camera, whilst S700 has 1.3 MP (1280 x 960).
@PeterKey
What kinda meal is that!?!?!??! 
_________________
Can someone help me on this? SE HBH-300 review request
[ This Message was edited by: Krubach on 2004-09-27 14:20 ] |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Another picture for you to drool at taken with my stunning S700i.
 |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
you certainly cannot complain at the pics the S700 takes mind you I guess at full resolution and quality they will be, what? 400kb each?
|
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Not all that big Massuer, here are the specs: -
 |
Krubach
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sunny Portugal! :)
PM |
Well, the size of the pictures is much depending on what you are taking a picture (meaning the complexity of the picture in terms of colors).
If you take a 1280x960 pic at a blue sky the size will be much smaller than the size of a picture with the same resulotion of a garden full of flowers.
[addsig] |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
hmmm, must be a tighter jpeg compression than my old olympus 1.3 megapixel camera had about 4 or 5 years ago. not bad.
|
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Compression is quite good for the quality of picture.
I must admit i am impressed with the quality of the S700i camera. Must be cos i have been using the P900 for almost a year. |
plasmadog
Joined: May 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Beantown, India
PM |
the pics are good really...
but i think u need to post photos under varying light conditions to actually see how good they are.
how are the pics during night time? |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Heres a picture taken in the dark in my car:
Another in the home:
My Watch:
 |
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
I have been quite impressed with the quality of pictures taken with the S700 compared with those taken by my K700; I'm not a terribly good photographer I'm afraid, but I had a jolly good bash at it anyway. I'll hopefully take some outdoor picture slater today and post them.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
|
|
Posted: 2004-09-27 14:53
