| Author |
Can the 6600 do everything the P900 does? |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
if u just look at it based on the following criteria: number of functions per price ratio, then there is no need to debate this any more (or is it?)
|
|
|
dave_uk
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
If you look at it on a functions:price ratio, then you are changing the topic, are you not?
The original question did not factor in the price difference in any way, did it?
|
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
@dave_uk:
yeah ur right. I take back my statement. my bad. |
hyperactive83
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Posts: 39
From: Australia
PM |
Well I'm sorry if this doesnt fit into the topic header, but I just thought I would contribute my 2 cents.
Personally the looks of my phone are VERY important to me. If a phone I take out of my pocket doesnt look good I just cant fall in love with it or like it for that matter. For me, priority number 1. The thing here is that I HATE egg-shaped phones and unfortunately nokia 6600 is very egg-shaped. I remember when a friend of mine took it out to show off last year, i was like.. damn that is one ugly phone (again personal opinion). That was also the reason I didnt like the p800 which kinda had that style. Feature wise, if the nokia looked better then it does.. I prolly would've gotten it last year, but thankfully i didnt and I went for the p900. I dont regret my decision at all cause since I bought the phone I never grew sick of it and the feature which i love the most is watching movies in a large screen where i can also see whats going on, compared to the 6600 where i was asking my freind.. hmm whats this here, a person?
So at the end you can say all you want that the 6600 has all the features the p900 has, for me it doesnt have the 2 most important things, which the p900 has.
|
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
@hyperactive83
Quote:
| The thing here is that I HATE egg-shaped phones and unfortunately nokia 6600 is very egg-shaped. |
|
u make it sound like there were many egg-shaped phones before and that pisses u off. if i remember correctly 6600 is the only phone that resembled an egg.
so is it that 1) u hv the foresight to know that u r going to hate egg-shaped phones before one even came out or 2) is it because u got a P900 and 6600 looks like an egg, that's why u hate egg-shaped phones. |
hyperactive83
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Posts: 39
From: Australia
PM |
Hmm I'm not quite sure I get you. Maybe what I should've stated is that I saw the 6600 before I even knew about the p900. I didnt like the looks from the start even though I liked the features, same thing with the p800, which was less egg-shaped then the 6600, but it stll bugged me.
Now that I have the p900 and I can compare the phones, like I said.. my personal opinion is that I like the p900 better. If I didnt, I would've gone for the 6600 or the p800 back in the days.
|
Kryptik
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Port Elizabeth, S.Africa
PM |
*nudge nudge* yeah, the p-series is great, fantastic in fact... But the simple reality is that some of us like our Nokias. I've been addicted to this horse-egg 6600 from Day1, wouldn't easily exchange it for another.
This message was posted from a Nokia |
Residentevil
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Raccoon City, USA
PM, WWW
|
The Nokia's screen is way too small. It is like watching Star Wars on a handheld 2" TV.
Tough times don't last, tough people do!
Free Tibet |
mrao
Joined: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Mumbai, India
PM |
Add lack of stereo sound to that
 t610 > k700i > p800 > p900 > p910 > k750i > I-mate Jam > Blokia 6681 > HTC Prophet > HTC Wizard & Nokia N73 > E71 > BB 9000 > HTC Desire > Samsung Galaxy S > Samsung Galaxy S II & the Motorola Xoom <br /> Still Shiny but not so n |
Nokialoverx
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Posts: 122
PM, WWW
|
Maybe because you are all used to the big p series screen so the s60 screens looks small.The s60 screen size is quite alright.
This message was posted from a Nokia |
ersatz0906
Joined: May 02, 2004
Posts: 135
PM |
6600 can handle all the p9 has as long as its a software issue. but if hardware is concern then theres no comparison. what i like about the p9, it has a bigscreen but small enough to carry inside my pocket, and also you can text or call using one hand. will hadnt seen any celphone like that, correct if im wrong |
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
Id like to add my opinion regarding these 2 phones:from the begining,the build-quality of the 6600 seemed awful and when l had 1 in my hand,I realized it was worst than l ever thought;it i not bad,it truly sucks-it's not light,it's hallow and flimsy.Anyway,back then,i wasnt interested in buying a smartphone. BUT 6 months later when i did,p900,p910i and Treo 600 sprung to mind.No 6600..althouqh i paid quite a bit for my p910i,for me is the best choice and a very exclusive 1.The 6600 can do almost all that p910i can but not as good and as easily as the last one.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
Pepi
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Posts: 418
From: Bulgaria
PM |
and after i all if i want to buy a smartphone i would go for the 6600 |
Kryptik
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Port Elizabeth, S.Africa
PM |
Yep, i'd have loved to have had a P910i too... But my budget allowed a 6600 as a smartphone... And now, even though i could buy a host of P-whatevers, i'm content with my 6600. Had a 6670 and 80 for a few days, still prefer my old phone ;o)
This message was posted from a Nokia |
|
|
Posted: 2004-09-30 14:01
t610 > k700i > p800 > p900 > p910 > k750i > I-mate Jam > Blokia 6681 > HTC Prophet > HTC Wizard & Nokia N73 > E71 > BB 9000 > HTC Desire > Samsung Galaxy S > Samsung Galaxy S II & the Motorola Xoom 
