| Author |
S65 power phone. better than K700i? |
jr_rca
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: 333
From: Philippines
PM |
very good phone....but bad news for MP3 users.
it has the same speed of K700i and menu funtion.
what do you think?
[ This Message was edited by: jr_rca on 2004-08-27 17:07 ] |
|
|
Ayush
Joined: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Hyderabad, india
PM |
It's a smart phone?
This message was posted from a T610 |
jr_rca
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: 333
From: Philippines
PM |
no its not....but check it out:
irda, bluetooth, 1000 phne book with 14 fields, 11mb internal memory and free 64mb RC MMC. etc...combination of metal and plastic housing.
T68mi lunar grey |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
S65.. mmm.. bad display, bad megapixel camera, bad mp3 playback.. such a boring phone. |
jr_rca
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: 333
From: Philippines
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-08-26 10:08:52, Amras wrote:
S65.. mmm.. bad display, bad megapixel camera, bad mp3 playback.. such a boring phone.
|
|
really, have you tried it? i dont think so. it has 1.3mp cam. yes there is no mp3 but do you really need your phone have one? better try it first before saying "BORING". |
david1975
Joined: Apr 05, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
I totaly agree the s65 is a great phone se should feel ashamed of themselves the s65 has a better design better bigger screen who cares about mp3 player
This message was posted from a Nokia |
Vlammetje
Joined: Mar 01, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Den Haag
PM, WWW
|
s65 is a good phone. but why should  be ashamed?? 
|
Elrond
Joined: May 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Slovakia
PM, WWW
|
It's a good phone, but agree with vlamm. Why should be  ashamed ? 
BTW. Why is this in general forum.
[ This Message was edited by: Elrond on 2004-08-27 10:28 ] |
david1975
Joined: Apr 05, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
Sorry i think saying they should be ashamed is a bit to much i was just saying the s65 isnt boring sorry se
This message was posted from a Nokia |
xato
Joined: Nov 02, 2002
Posts: 14
From: London (UK)
PM |
I dont understand why the k700 has mp3 playback but no expansion, but the s65 you say has mmc but no mp3 :| wots going on
----------- my P800  is so cute!! |
jontyf
Joined: Apr 29, 2004
Posts: 468
From: Hertfordshire, England
PM |
That is because the S65 is a megapixel camera, pictures take up a lot more memory. 1.3 is on par with some digital cameras, most of which have MMC slots.
S65 is a nice looking phone aswell! |
mmsman
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: slovenia
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-08-27 12:25:05, jontyf wrote:
That is because the S65 is a megapixel camera, pictures take up a lot more memory. 1.3 is on par with some digital cameras, most of which have MMC slots.
S65 is a nice looking phone aswell!
|
|
yeah but in that logic k700 should also have an expansion slot considering that it can take pictures in extended 1.3 mp mode.....
and 1.3mp doesn't take that much space, i mean you can easily have 60 pics on a 128 mb with a 5mp camera.... |
Ayush
Joined: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Hyderabad, india
PM |
And how much does it cost?
Ayush |
ThreeX
Joined: Dec 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Less than K700 is all I know, donīt have time to find current prices right now though.
Happy owner of: Ericsson GH198, S868, SH888, R310s, T10s, T28s, A2618s, T39m x2, T68m, T66, SE t68i, T610, S700i, Nokia 2110i, 6210, 8310, 8850, 8890 and 6680 Siemens S55 |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
The S65 is really not that special
It has a big - but not very good screen. Low resolution compared to screensize and dull colors. Comparing the same pictures on both phones and the K700 screen is much higher quality - much sharper and brighter/better colorreproduction.
It has a memoryslot - but no ability to playback musicfiles of any kind neither mp3 nor AAC/mp4
This also means no mp3 ringtones.
Videorecording/playback is subpar to the K700 - K700 can play back mp4video with highquality AAC smoothly - S65 only support low quality amr and playback is not as smooth as K700
It has an 1.3mp camera - but quality is not particularly good - pictures have litle color and for instance the 1mp camera of N7610 beats it hands down.
heres a link to a good comparison
http://home.online.no/~rontonic/s65vs7610.htm
It has adopted the menu from S//E - but my guess is because siemens whish to save battery they have designed the menu rather boring with few colors. Some may say they like it - but I see no point in having a colorscreen and not using it.
But no complaints as to the function of the menus or the filesystem - these work fine.
Design is very nice I think - but keypad feels cheep and way to small for comfortable use.
All in all - its a good standard phone with a megapixel camera - but nothing special to rock the market and certainly not anything that should make S//E ashamed of the K700 - which sports more possibilities than the S65 and in a nicer way.
|
|
|
Posted: 2004-08-26 09:50
is so cute!!
