Esato

Forum > General discussions > Other manufacturers > P900 beaten by... N-Gage

123  Next
Author P900 beaten by... N-Gage
Super G
T68i
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 12:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/68/34371.html

Or said otherwise: UIQ beaten by S60 (is that a surprise really )
I like that part of the article:

"As a smartphone, we enjoyed using the N-Gage more than we did Sony Ericsson's new P900. Much as we liked the P900's hardware, we didn't get on so well with its UIQ user interface. We weren't keen on its look and feel, and found it slow and unresponsive to use. The N-Gage's shares the P900's Symbian OS foundation, but uses Nokia's own Series 60 UI. It's not only more aesthetically pleasing than UIQ, but felt quicker to use.

We ran Apple's iSync to transfer nearly 300 contacts to the N-Gage via Bluetooth. The software detected the device immediately, and the sync was fast and free of the 'will it work this time or not' uncertainty we experienced with the P900.

Scrolling through the list of names was reasonably quick, but jumping to a letter made tracking down the right individual even fast. Select them, and up come their details. Scroll down to phone numbers - highlighted with telephone or mobile icons - or email address, and initiating a call or sending a message is a click away.

Calendar entries are similarly easy to read, cramming in not only appointment details, but day, week and month views that are pleasant to read. There's no need to squint. On the basis of the P900's UI, we decided we couldn't move from our trusty PalmOne Tungsten to a smartphone. Having tried Series 60 on the N-Gage, we're no longer so sure."
JohnM
Samsung Galaxy S i9000
Joined: Jan 06, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Burton-on-Trent , UK
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 13:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
You can't compare a handset like the Ngage (which is essentially a gaming device) with a P900 which is still a phone but manages to incorporate PDA functionality. A better comparison would be between a P900 and 6600.
Trusted trader.
Krubach
T39 black
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sunny Portugal! :)
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 13:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@Super G

Isn't that an advertising page? It sure looks like one...

@The guy who made the article:
...as previously stated before:
NOT COMPARABLE!

[addsig]
mmsman
P800
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: slovenia
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 13:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
lol that's one heck of a dumb article
lol it's just like saying series 40 is faster than s60
ah what the heck i'm not going to go into this again....
@super g: i guess you don't have a p900 eh?

edit: actually i had a look at the two revies p900 and n-gage and as far as i can see they think p900 is better except for the ui which they think it isn't good.....

[ This Message was edited by: mmsman on 2004-03-02 12:30 ]
Krubach
T39 black
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sunny Portugal! :)
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 13:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
This isn't about Super G.
He just posted an article written by someone else.
I'm sure he is laughing as much as we are.

_________________
David Bradley (IBM engineer), inventor of Ctrl+Alt+Del:
"I may have invented it, but Bill made it famous".

[ This Message was edited by: Krubach on 2004-03-02 12:32 ]
mmsman
P800
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: slovenia
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 13:47
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
well actually i have read the p900 review and he is actually very fond of the device so....
and well he isn't really comparing the two phones he just pointed out the s60 is still an excellent ui, he just mentioned that uiq isn't in his opinion that good because it doesn't have a "real" today view etc.
and about the sync he only mentioned that nokia has better sync with macs than se...

so i don't get the point of this thread

@krubach: ok i think we all know that super g is a nokia die hard fan and he IS luaghing but not because of the artivle itself but because they say nokia is better than se......
which they btw don't say....
andrew99
T39 black
Joined: Nov 29, 2001
Posts: 254
From: london
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 14:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Here's a few more comments on the n-gage...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/35955.html

just to stir things up!

[ This Message was edited by: andrew99 on 2004-03-02 13:15 ]
JohnM
Samsung Galaxy S i9000
Joined: Jan 06, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Burton-on-Trent , UK
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 14:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Iike it
Flying Finn
K800 Black
Joined: Dec 12, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Finland
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 14:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2004-03-02 13:05:00, JohnM wrote:
A better comparison would be between a P900 and 6600.




As what comes to the features theregister tested, the N-Gage is pretty much identical with the 6600 (both being Series 60). If you compare the N-Gage to the 3650 respectively, the only difference is the lack of camera and the addition of stereo sound for the mp3 player and FM radio (the N-Gage also has more RAM to run the games but that's a hardware thing).

[ This Message was edited by: Flying Finn on 2004-03-02 13:37 ]
Super G
T68i
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 15:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Absolutely no point in this thread at all... or...

I just thought it was funny that for once a news website acknowledged some good points of N-Gage vs other device, here P900.

At the end it goes down to Series 60 vs UIQ. Not very comparable in term of UI itself as they use two different approaches, but still the comparison in terms of responsiveness, intuitiveness and clarity still holds for these smart phones, as for a smart phone (obviously not a Smartphone (r)), the UI and OS are very important.
ac
Xperia Mini Pro Black
Joined: Feb 09, 2003
Posts: 316
From: India
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 15:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
IMHO, the N-Gage and the P900 are too different to be compared. The P900 in any case is superior. But if the N-Gage was a little smaller and without the moronic side-talking problem things would have been VERY different.
tom_riddle
C902 Red
Joined: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 292
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 16:00
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i dont think nokia n-gage is comparable to a p9.

This message was posted from a P900

mmsman
P800
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: slovenia
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 16:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
actually i think we are not comparing p9 to a n-g but uiq to s60......
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2004-03-02 16:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
This comparing thing is a joke by my opinion. Of course u can compare everything with everything, but only if there is a certain kind of logic.

This message was posted from a R520

Red_Five
P900
Joined: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: 95
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2004-03-02 19:18
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
At the end of the day, they are just 2 differnt phones doing different things.

If you want a phone which can double up as a PDS, get a P900.

If you want a doner kebab which makes phone calls and plays games, get an N-Gage.

If you just want to debate which is better, go away and find a N*kia forum.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi