Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > T610 vs T630

Author T610 vs T630
obobon
T610
Joined: Feb 05, 2004
Posts: 1
From: Bobon Island
PM, WWW
Posted: 2004-02-05 21:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Currently i own a T610. It is geat but there are some thigs that are still annoying...
1) Speaker is silent. Too silent at noisy locations...
2) Signal reception is very poor (compared to T39)
3) Battery drowns fast
4) cam resolution is not high...
Are these things solved at T630? (especially 1 and 2?)
When will SE announce upcoming phones? In the past there have always been new phones on the upcoming page - but this page is only filled with Z1010 - for weeks now...
emanuelj
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Jan 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2004-02-05 22:07
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
No, same speaker and same antenna!
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2004-02-05 22:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
hej, yes d reception could b better, but never had prob with speaker. worked great by me. reg
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
jadeparfait
K700
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: 194
From: Bangalore, India
PM
Posted: 2004-02-06 12:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
hi..
i just found the following in this site:

http://fscklog.typepad.com/fsck/2003/12/sony_ericsson_t.html

its part english and part foreign language..

"Some have asked about differences between the T630 and the T610:

1. The T610 has a STN display, while the T630 has TFT. The difference between them is that the quality of TFT is much better.
2. The T630 has new function called "My frends"
3. The T630 has new gam called "VRally2"
4. The T630 supports a gamepad
5. The T630 is slightly smaller and lighter"



guess some more things about these STN and TFT thingys

TFT == Thin Film Transistor - is a technology for building LCD screens. TFTs are brighter and more readable than LCDs , but cost more and consume more power. TFT is also known as AMLCD, or Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Display.

STN == Super Twist Nematic - a long long time ago, researchers discovered that the more twisted the molecules were in a liquid crystal display, the better the contrast produced.

o what's the difference between TFT-LCDs and STN-LCDs?

A typical LCD display is formed by 6-10 thick nematic liquid crystals sandwiched between two glass plates that are coated with indium tin oxide (ITO), an electrically conductive transparent coating.

STN-LCDs are passive matrix displays, less expensive to manufacture, but also generally inferior in display quality compared to TFT-LCDs. STN-LCDs also often produce "ghosting" effects -- left over traces as images disappear, such as when a mouse cursor is moved across the screen.

The term "twisted nematic" refers to the fact that each nematic molecule is twisted to various degrees to create different display attributes and qualities. Super-twisted nematic LCDs are twisted more intricately than simply twisted nematic LCDs.

TFT-LCDs are active matrix displays, and so offer higher-grade images, but are more expensive to manufacture. They have higher refresh rates yielding much crisper images, and they also offer better viewing angles.

For example, passive matrix notebook computers often cannot be viewed from an peripheral angle, unlike active matrix displays, or TFT-LCDs. However many business users find that STN-LCDs suit them better as they provide more privacy, and can prevent onlookers from observing the contents of their screen.

some more of differences explained below..
http://www.solomon-systech.com/pdf/GC%20MLA%20Chipset.pdf








[ This Message was edited by: jadeparfait on 2004-02-06 11:50 ]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi