mlife
Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-12-21 17:57:23, cu015170 wrote:
^ still a little bit noisier, but much better ... what do you think ?
I wish they added a 8Mpix mode to the 1020 so it can go head to head with the 808 in that department as well.
I agree but to be honest thats not why I was excited about this update.... I maintain what I have said before in regards to IQ at this level, it just doesn't matter. But when you need it to matter, I feel having access to the DNG is the golden ticket here. below are two more images from the same scene with only default processing done to the 1020 dng via NoiseNinja....
1020
Original
808
Original
[ This Message was edited by: mlife on 2013-12-21 18:54 ] [addsig] |
mlife
Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-12-21 20:04:20, cu015170 wrote:
^ ya... the processed image looks very good indeed..
I didn't know about that PS plug in.. very nice
Noise Ninja is great... although I use the plugin, they also have a new standalone app.... By using Noise Ninja and DNG files I'm guessing I can create images from the 1020 at 100 asa which will challenge those from the 808 at 50 asa. Keep in mind the samples I have posted thus far this morning will stress noise levels at they are all exposures around the 2 second mark which is very stressful for such small sensors. I can't wait to get outside and get some images in the 1/125 - 1/2000 sec range and see how the 1020 does.
[ This Message was edited by: mlife on 2013-12-21 19:15 ] [addsig] |
Posted: 2013-12-21 19:50
