| Author |
Xperia Z Officially Announced |
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
^
Yes, Europe may get it around late May or June too (worst case scenario) |
|
|
tapas123
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
Posts: 289
From: India
PM |
On 2013-01-27 12:48:22, randomuser wrote:
LOL tapas, he wrote AGAINST Z 
ohh    
anyways when Z is gonna launch in India??some are saying 20th feb,some 1st week of march??  |
vikeviki
Joined: Oct 16, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: INDIA,bangalore
PM |
really sad that Sony is not marketing it properly  come on sony speakup ,when is the release date?   |
vikeviki
Joined: Oct 16, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: INDIA,bangalore
PM |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XH4KfL7ay4 |
itsjustJOH
Joined: Jul 23, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
At first I thought it was a dummy phone because the wallpaper looked so real. |
Guarulhos
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM |
@Bart1988 And @Randomuser...
You Are Wrong !
The Focal Aperture Xperia Z Is f/2.4 !
And That Is Sure Just Look At The Exif Data Of Images !
Regarding Your Other Considerations Are All Wrong !
You Presented Only Assumptions, No Technological Evidence That Contradicts What I Wrote !
But ... It Is Useless To Try Some Dialogue With You And Others !
After All For You Sony Lens Is Better Than Carl Zeiss Vario Tessar Lens !
After All For You Pixel Size (1,12 Microns) Is Better Than Pixel Size (1,4 Microns) !
After All For You Single Led (3rd Generation) Is Better Than Double Led Short Pulse High Power (4rd Generation) !
After All For You Digital Image Stabilization Is Better Than Optical Image Stabilization !
After All For You CMOS BSI SONY Is Better Than CMOS BSI TOSHIBA (True 16:9/4:3 Aspect Ratios) !
Absurd... Ridiculous !!! 
P.S: 
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2013-01-27 16:36 ] |
king-james
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: M.I.A.M.I
PM |
Guarulhos, you know what?
We don't care what lens, pixel size, single led, digital image stabilization, CMOS and whatever Z get...
WE WILL BUY Z ANYWAY!!! WE LOVE SONY!!! I BUY IT ONLY BECAUSE OF THE DESIGN!!! 
So think what you want. We don't need your negative critics.
GO AND BUY NOKIA SHIT!
[ This Message was edited by: king-james on 2013-01-27 16:42 ] like.no.other |
Guarulhos
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM |
@King James...
You Are Wrong !
This Is Not Called Negative Criticism, Quite The Contrary !
This Os Called Clarifying The Truth !
P.S: Be Happy With Your Xperia Z !!! |
bart1988
Joined: Jan 27, 2013
Posts: 15
PM |
On 2013-01-27 17:26:09, Guarulhos wrote:
@Bart1988 And @Randomuser...
You Are Wrong !
The Focal Aperture Xperia Z Is f/2.4 !
And That Is Sure Just Look At The Exif Data Of Images !
Regarding Your Other Considerations Are All Wrong !
You Presented Only Assumptions, No Technological Evidence That Contradicts What I Wrote !
But ... It Is Useless To Try Some Dialogue With You And Others !
After All For You Sony Lens Is Better Than Carl Zeiss Vario Tessar Lens !
After All For You Pixel Size (1,12 Microns) Is Better Than Pixel Size ( 1,4 Microns) !
After All For You Single Led (3rd Generation) Is Better Than Double Led Short Pulse High Power (4rd Generation) !
After All For You Digital Image Stabilization Is Better Than Optical Image Stabilization !
After All For You CMOS BSI SONY Is Better Than CMOS BSI TOSHIBA (True 16:9/4:3 Aspect Ratios) !
Absurd... Ridiculous !!!
P.S:
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2013-01-27 16:36 ]
When i saw your first post i thought you knew what you are talking about. But now i know you can only read spec sheets and assume bigger or smaller is automaticly better.
According to sony the 13mp exmor rs version is F2.2, the others are F2.4. http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201208/12-107E/index.html
Carl zeiss is just marketing. It's a plastic lens and you can not prove it is better. Not with any facts, because you don't have access to the specifications of both lenses. So don't come here saying you know every fact, because you can't back it up yourself.
I've explained the pixel size before, but you clearly have no clue what's unique about the exmor RS compared to older BSI sensors. It captures 30% more light because the amplification circuits are on the back. This way you can reduce the pixel size while capturing the same amount of light. So it doesn't mean anything that the pixel size of the nokia is bigger, because it's not the same technology.
If you've read my post correctly, you would have noticed that i admitted the nokia has a better image stabilizer.
Please just leave this thread if you have no clue what the difference is between facts and your opinion, and only spam the thread with nonsense.
And if the future reviews show that the camera of the nokia is better overall, even then everyone would rather have the xperia Z because of all the other specifications that are clearly better.
edit: if the xperia does have f2.4, then that doesn't mean it will perform worse than the nokia with f2.0. Because even though the nokia would let in more light, maby it needs more light because the sensor can't capture enough with f2.4 and the sony can. So just wait till the reviews come out. Because you are also comparing prototype xperia z pictures with a nokia that has had firmware updates specificly to update it's camera quality.
[ This Message was edited by: bart1988 on 2013-01-27 16:57 ] |
tapas123
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
Posts: 289
From: India
PM |
+1 |
Felimenta97
Joined: Dec 07, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
PM, WWW
|
Can we set up like this:
Xperia Z Camera is Awesome. Lumia 920 Camera is also awesome. That means both cameras are awesome. Both phones, specially in camera departament have their own tech to make them better. Some points, one might be better than another, and vice versa.
Guarulhos, sabemos que está defendendo o Lumia a todo vapor, mas pare de discutir. Por mais que tente, e que eu goste da Sony, está no lugar errado. Aqui é um forum Sonysta. Procure um outro que não seja um forum fanboy (vamos adimitir, aqui é um lugar de fan boys da Sony). (whoever wants to know, translate from portuguese);
Xperia Z wins in design. Lumia may win by a hair line thin of a better camera. We don't know. We all shall see.
I don't get people. Never Have, never will. |
Away
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
I side with Bart1988. And we'll know the answer when the phone comes out and tests are done. |
buns
Joined: Jan 14, 2013
Posts: 92
PM |
Shooting Ant with Xperia Z. 13MP, 1080p, Phone Camera focus Test.-using external lens!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WC6JY6BPnIY
sony should release external lens! |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Make no assumptions until final retail version. I have made that mistake before. And stop laughing about it as if we're in the school playground Guaralhous
Phone?? What phone?? |
Guarulhos
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM |
@Bart1988...
Come To The "REAL" Facts !
This Is An Image Taken With The Camera Xperia Z !
SOURCE: http://blog.clove.co.uk/2013/01/14/sony-xperia-z-sample-images/
Below The Image Exif Data !
Therefore, The Focal Aperture Is f/2.4 !!!
That's The Truth... The Rest Is Rest !
Carl Zeiss Is Just Marketing ???
Exmor R Mobile (Sharpness Null And Big Noise Digital) That Yes What is Marketing ! 
Who Should Leave The Topic Is You Than No Clue What The Difference Is Between Facts And Your Opinion And Only Spam The Thread With Nonsense !
P.S: Stop Lying And Inventing... Study More Technology And Mainly Photography !
No More !!! |
|
|
Posted: 2013-01-27 15:30
