| Author |
Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion |
fbloise
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM, WWW
|
Same here, except I'm using the colored one 
Phone is much quicker now, love it!
"Haters are just confused Admirers" My WebsiteForo.DO Facebook Group at http://www.facebook.com/groups/esato/ BBM: 2B5E52DF |
|
|
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2014-01-06 12:55:42, fbloise wrote:
Same here, except I'm using the colored one
Phone is much quicker now, love it!
I switched mine to the colored one as well.. the dark one was hard to see in daylight.
Otherwise ya.. the phone hasn't performed that well since I got it in 2012.. they've done a great job on 1.3
|
emerson_shei
Joined: Mar 03, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM |
The Nokia 808 PureView takes on two DSLRs and a compact 
http://www.members.westnet.com.au/vaneede/cameras/cameras.htm |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
Ya.. the 808 is a very powerful machine  Like I've said many times here, it can hang with the Sony RX100 in most cases, or with any other 1" sensor device for that matter.
Its really clever technology, and you factor in the size difference b/w the 808's camera module vs the compacts .. its even more impressive.
I love shooting with mine.. its a joy to look at those clean low ISO pics  |
wthc
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
Posts: 19
PM |
“The 808, GX7 and 400D are so close in some of them, its hard to say which is better”
808 close to Gx7 photos? 
|
fbloise
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM, WWW
|
haters gonna hate  
"Haters are just confused Admirers" My WebsiteForo.DO Facebook Group at http://www.facebook.com/groups/esato/ BBM: 2B5E52DF |
wthc
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
Posts: 19
PM |
On 2014-01-07 11:37:15, fbloise wrote:
haters gonna hate
Fan(ny)boy make me laugh, never hate
So, give me ONE pic where 808 is close to Gx7...
|
mlife
Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2014-01-07 12:33:56, wthc wrote:
give me ONE pic where 808 is close to Gx7...
I love my 808 but that simply won't happen.... when i read that review, I had to scroll back up to the top to see what a Gx7 looked like because the pics were in a whole different ballpark.
[addsig] |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
For me the 808 is more than enough in terms of IQ .. but then again, I don't shoot anything that would require a much bigger sensor/optics.
With any of these comps, always keep in mind the size difference. The camera housing (sensor, optics, etc.) on the 808 is not even 20% of the size of that Panasonic... |
wthc
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
Posts: 19
PM |
“More than enough” or “can hang 1" sensor” is true if you mean the resolution at low iso. At the other side dynamic range, colors accuracy and noise control of 808 are really bad, checking tests have confirmed this. For example, give a look at this comparison picture:
808
Gx7
808 has clipping highlights with all details gone, as well as pinkish red.
My little camera handles clipping highlights way better, has colors accuracy way better, handles pics with iso over 400 way better, and catch little less details that 808. Camera housing is smaller and lighter than 808, and I have paid it a third of 808’s price.
|
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
^ Yes, your little camera is way better.. enjoy it! |
aussieland1
Joined: Apr 11, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2014-01-09 14:41:36, wthc wrote:
. Camera housing is smaller and lighter than 808, and I have paid it a third of 808’s price.
To be fair unless you can check your email and browse the net and make phone calls on your little camera it should be much cheaper |
emerson_shei
Joined: Mar 03, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM |
Comparison: Nokia 808 PureView Vs Nokia Lumia 1020 PureView Vs Nokia Lumia 1520 PureView Vs Sony DSC-QX100 
http://pureviewclub.com/2014/20150 |
wthc
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
Posts: 19
PM |
On 2014-01-09 17:56:59, cu015170 wrote:
^ Yes, your little camera is way better.. enjoy it!
Do you want to hear that 808 is the best camera? It’s not, quality is not only resolution.
On 2014-01-10 07:57:33, aussieland1 wrote:
To be fair unless you can check your email and browse the net and make phone calls on your little camera it should be much cheaper
I have a cameraphone and I have a compact camera, I use very little the cameraphone (to call not to take picture), and I use a better camera that suits my photographic needs. Why? Because I don’t want to take lot of SAR. Have you ever seen the sar level of 808? It’s 1.23 W/kg , at least something to worry about. Not?
“Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2012 Apr;29(4):293-7 | Merhi ZO.
Study conclusions: The radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) produced by cell phones can enhance the excitability of the brain and has recently been classified as carcinogenic."
"Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2013 May 30 | Rago R and Salacone P, et al
Study conclusions: Sperm DNA fragmentation significantly altered in the subjects who use the mobile phone for more than 4 hours for day and in particular for those who use the device in the pocket of the trousers."
"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2013 Mar;65(2):85-96 | Kesari KK, Kumar S, Nirala J, Siddiqui MH, Behari J.
Study conclusions: There are hazardous health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiations emitted from mobile phone on the human reproductive pattern. This is especially problematic while keeping mobile phones in pocket or near testicular organs.Testicular infertility or testicular cancer due to mobile phone or microwave radiations suggests an increased level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) also known as oxidation, which can also lead to DNA fragmentation. Though generation of ROS in testis has been responsible for possible toxic effects on physiology of reproduction, the reviews of last few decades have well established that these radiations are very harmful and cause mutagenic changes in reproductive pattern and leads to infertility. Further concluding, radio frequency electromagnetic radiation emitted from mobile phone causes biological damage and leads to several changes like decreased sperm count, enzymatic and hormonal changes, DNA damage, and apoptosis formation."
"Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2007 Sep;15(3):266-70 | Deepinder F, Makker K, Agarwal A.
Study conclusions: A recent study found that use of cell phones adversely affects the quality of semen by decreasing the sperm counts, motility, viability and morphology."
"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2007;14(1):169-72 | Wdowiak A, Wdowiak L, Wiktor H.
Study conclusions: An increase in the percentage of sperm cells of abnormal morphology is associated with the duration of exposure to the waves emitted by the mobile phones. It was also confirmed that a decrease in the percentage of sperm cells in vital progressing motility in the semen is correlated with the frequency of using mobile phones."
http://naturalfertilitybreakt[....]bile-phones-cause-infertility/
From the comparison posted above:
“To be completely honest – in this example I don’t like the colors of the Nokia 808 PureView very much compared to the other three. The Nokia 808 PureView makes it look almost purple, whereas all other three capture the orange of the original much better. “
What I was talking about?
|
mlife
Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
^^^^^^^^
INFERTILITY PLEASE.... I'll take infertility from an 808 over KIDS - ANY DAY OF THE WEEK... So if thats the best you got for hating on the 808, Im good with iit....
[ This Message was edited by: mlife on 2014-01-11 15:27 ] [addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2014-01-06 12:55
