| Author |
Sony Xperia Rumours 2012 |
justus333
Joined: Apr 21, 2007
Posts: 135
PM |
i think they all look the same! Sony manages to produce one spitting image device after another. the differences are so marginal and random as well that Im still wondering who made it into top-management at Sony!? | |
|
admad
Joined: May 26, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Poland
PM |
On 2012-07-23 03:44:38, titus1 wrote:
On 2012-07-22 20:11:03, admad wrote:
Look at the buttons, it's sad -.- Is it really that obsolete now to make hardware buttons? Not only it takes usability away, but the good looks also, now enlighten me, how may i wake phone using home button, when there isn't one? Faillllll
In a way, there's app for that. You just have to shake the phone to wake it up. Or other apps that uses the volume rocker. You just have to search the Market instead of whining. Really.
That's wonderful, if I wanted sth that stupid I would go for Apple. Why strip phone from useful buttons, when it gives absolutely no advantage? Look at it, there's 1 cm strip under display just for the name XPERIA, how stupid is that... What's next, voice activated buttons? "Volume up" "Volume down" "Power on" haha |
mariozlp
Joined: May 29, 2007
Posts: 354
From: Greece\Athens
PM |
and i thought Sony was trying to avoid copying device. They look the same to me. Small differences basically on screen pixel ratio, and size. There are no more small devices, just acceptable size low ends and huge higher speced ones. I remember sonyericsson was talking about innovation, well i'm not excited about anything. A few years ago i couldn't wait to see future phones and the choice was easier, because it was obvious which device was the flagship. Now i want one feature of that device and other feature of another model and another from another. The last phone Sony - Sonyericsson made me wanna buy it was Ray, specwise and compact. + beautiful. I do like phones like P now but its too big for my taste. |
motvikt
Joined: Jun 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-07-23 15:34:00, mariozlp wrote:
and i thought Sony was trying to avoid copying device. They look the same to me. Small differences basically on screen pixel ratio, and size. There are no more small devices, just acceptable size low ends and huge higher speced ones. I remember sonyericsson was talking about innovation, well i'm not excited about anything. A few years ago i couldn't wait to see future phones and the choice was easier, because it was obvious which device was the flagship. Now i want one feature of that device and other feature of another model and another from another. The last phone Sony - Sonyericsson made me wanna buy it was Ray, specwise and compact. + beautiful. I do like phones like P now but its too big for my taste.
Hopefully the sx will have an internationalversion, its the true successor to ray |
lolstebbo
Joined: Aug 01, 2009
Posts: 182
From: California
PM |
On 2012-07-23 15:34:00, mariozlp wrote:
and i thought Sony was trying to avoid copying device. They look the same to me. Small differences basically on screen pixel ratio, and size. There are no more small devices, just acceptable size low ends and huge higher speced ones. I remember sonyericsson was talking about innovation, well i'm not excited about anything. A few years ago i couldn't wait to see future phones and the choice was easier, because it was obvious which device was the flagship. Now i want one feature of that device and other feature of another model and another from another. The last phone Sony - Sonyericsson made me wanna buy it was Ray, specwise and compact. + beautiful. I do like phones like P now but its too big for my taste.
Sony's still got their small devices. The U is relatively compact, and the Sola's not exactly huge, either.
And if the SX ever makes it out of Japan, then we'll have our Ray successor. |
titus1
Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: here
PM, WWW
|
On 2012-07-23 09:44:00, admad wrote:
On 2012-07-23 03:44:38, titus1 wrote:
On 2012-07-22 20:11:03, admad wrote:
Look at the buttons, it's sad -.- Is it really that obsolete now to make hardware buttons? Not only it takes usability away, but the good looks also, now enlighten me, how may i wake phone using home button, when there isn't one? Faillllll
In a way, there's app for that. You just have to shake the phone to wake it up. Or other apps that uses the volume rocker. You just have to search the Market instead of whining. Really.
That's wonderful, if I wanted sth that stupid I would go for Apple. Why strip phone from useful buttons, when it gives absolutely no advantage? Look at it, there's 1 cm strip under display just for the name XPERIA, how stupid is that... What's next, voice activated buttons? "Volume up" "Volume down" "Power on" haha
There's a lot of Xperias that would cater to your needs...buttons you say? The 2011 Xperia line-up down to X10 has it. Go buy Samsung for buttons, they still put those. Or Nokia Belle (or whatever it was called) See? It is better to shut up and just look for BUTTONS. |
Detox
Joined: Oct 10, 2007
Posts: 340
PM |
A new smartphone on the horizon:
Sony LT25c
Phones:
W800i | K800i | K850i | W902 | Xperia S
Firmwares:
R1AA008 | R1CB001 | R1EA031 | R3EA037 | 6.1.A.2.55 |
king-james
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: M.I.A.M.I
PM |
@Detox
  |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM, WWW
|
One of the advantages of a phone with on screen buttons is that there is no paint to peel off, which normally happens after a year of so of moderate use.
|
Felimenta97
Joined: Dec 07, 2011
Posts: 293
PM |
On 2012-07-23 21:48:57, goldenface wrote:
One of the advantages of a phone with on screen buttons is that there is no paint to peel off, which normally happens after a year of so of moderate use.
And you can customize them.
I don't get people. Never Have, never will. |
kewsvnet
Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Posts: 241
From: United Kingdom
PM |
On 2012-07-23 22:16:53, Felimenta97 wrote:
On 2012-07-23 21:48:57, goldenface wrote:
One of the advantages of a phone with on screen buttons is that there is no paint to peel off, which normally happens after a year of so of moderate use.
And you can customize them.
yeah but try using a touch screen without looking at it....with physical buttons u can easily do that...also u can have ur fingers on top of the button without actually pressing them...and the click u get as a confirmation of a button press...sorry but no matter how good touchscreens get...they can never replicate the experience of physical buttons...and you will always get people who appreciate this experience....it is just a shame that the market does not seem to cater to these people anymore |
titus1
Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: here
PM, WWW
|
On 2012-07-24 00:14:58, kewsvnet wrote:
On 2012-07-23 22:16:53, Felimenta97 wrote:
On 2012-07-23 21:48:57, goldenface wrote:
One of the advantages of a phone with on screen buttons is that there is no paint to peel off, which normally happens after a year of so of moderate use.
And you can customize them.
yeah but try using a touch screen without looking at it....with physical buttons u can easily do that...also u can have ur fingers on top of the button without actually pressing them...and the click u get as a confirmation of a button press...sorry but no matter how good touchscreens get...they can never replicate the experience of physical buttons...and you will always get people who appreciate this experience....it is just a shame that the market does not seem to cater to these people anymore
Symbian phones is waving at ya'  |
yuunanase
Joined: Sep 30, 2006
Posts: 137
From: utopia
PM, WWW
|
On 2012-07-24 00:14:58, kewsvnet wrote:
On 2012-07-23 22:16:53, Felimenta97 wrote:
On 2012-07-23 21:48:57, goldenface wrote:
One of the advantages of a phone with on screen buttons is that there is no paint to peel off, which normally happens after a year of so of moderate use.
And you can customize them.
yeah but try using a touch screen without looking at it....with physical buttons u can easily do that...also u can have ur fingers on top of the button without actually pressing them...and the click u get as a confirmation of a button press...sorry but no matter how good touchscreens get...they can never replicate the experience of physical buttons...and you will always get people who appreciate this experience....it is just a shame that the market does not seem to cater to these people anymore
Not unless they have a touchscreen with physical buttons:
http://mashable.com/2012/06/07/tactile-layer/
Devices: Z, V, T, TX, GX, tipo dual, ion, go, sola, S, NX, P, U, acro HD, Tablet S, Tablet P, arc S, pro, Ray, Acro, active, mini pro, mini, arc, neo, play, X1, X2, Pureness, X8, X10, X10 mini, X10 mini pro |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM, WWW
|
That's simply amazing. ^^ Just the type of tech that solves such problems.
|
mariozlp
Joined: May 29, 2007
Posts: 354
From: Greece\Athens
PM |
On 2012-07-23 16:45:12, lolstebbo wrote:
On 2012-07-23 15:34:00, mariozlp wrote:
and i thought Sony was trying to avoid copying device. They look the same to me. Small differences basically on screen pixel ratio, and size. There are no more small devices, just acceptable size low ends and huge higher speced ones. I remember sonyericsson was talking about innovation, well i'm not excited about anything. A few years ago i couldn't wait to see future phones and the choice was easier, because it was obvious which device was the flagship. Now i want one feature of that device and other feature of another model and another from another. The last phone Sony - Sonyericsson made me wanna buy it was Ray, specwise and compact. + beautiful. I do like phones like P now but its too big for my taste.
Sony's still got their small devices. The U is relatively compact, and the Sola's not exactly huge, either.
And if the SX ever makes it out of Japan, then we'll have our Ray successor.
Satio had 3.5inch display and was huge for my taste, even though i've bought it, anyway, i haven't play with a XU yet but sola was the maximum size i would buy, A friends' XS is a small tablet to me, i cant carry such device in my pocket, imagine a 4.6 inch device.... | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2012-07-23 09:37
