| Author |
Post Pictures Taken With The Xperia Arc - LT15i/a |
rikken
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
Does it really matter which phone has the better camera ? Seems like they are both very capable shooters  |
|
|
c1gar
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Posts: 24
From: UK
PM |
^^^ Exactly what rikken says
Who cares if you think the other two phones take better pics than the Arc. At the end of the day, there are only very small differences between the quality of the photos. IMO in some cases the Arc takes the better pic, in other cases the other phones take better pics. In general, the quality of the photos the Arc takes will be more than good enough for most people. If you want to take a photo and either zoom in on it 500 % or print it off on a huge poster, use a proper camera NOT a MOBILE PHONE!
back on topic: Some very nice photos taken by davidsic, these photos show just how capable the Arc is Kepp it up
[ This Message was edited by: c1gar on 2011-04-09 20:20 ] |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Also a point to be taken. Who really looks at their pics cropped or at full size zoomed in?? I,for one don't I look at them normally your just nit picking 
Phone?? What phone?? |
Shino03
Joined: Dec 22, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
On 2011-04-09 16:25:38, koss wrote:
On 2011-04-09 11:23:46, doministry wrote:
On 2011-04-09 09:19:27, marcink wrote:
Arc's camera is bad! just do your homework and check gsmarena's comparison. I've done my homework and prepared a 100% crop comparision from these gsmarena shots. Anyone willing to see please pm me your e-mail address. Arcs sensor is inferior to SGS2's, but better then lg2x. The problem is arc's photos are so small in size and optimized for viewing on the phone. Stop telling anyone that arc's camera is its strong point, because it's not true. I love its design, but won't buy it if the don't tweak it's camera drivers, because Exmor-R sensor seems to be almost as good as SGS2, and it seems that it's post-processing that makes photos form arc look so bad
Have no idea what crap you're talking about.
Maybe you're blind. But I've seen alot of night shots of camera phones and these are one of the best.
I watch them on PC and they look very good. I'm not saying that there are no other great night shooters,
but please don't say that cr..p. All of the digital camera photos are compromised in many ways, it's just a digital photo with relatively small sensors. But these photos look very good. I can send some or just look at originals.
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2011-04-09 10:24 ]
Arc camera is a bad camera. user marcink is right. Photos are good only downsized.
Take a look here http://www.gsmarena.com/samsu[....]lg_optimus_2x-review-585p3.php . Xperia Arc is third. From my opinion Samsung g s2 is 1 place, lg optimus x, second and xperia arc is in last place..
[ This Message was edited by: koss on 2011-04-09 15:58 ]
I disagree. The arc's camera is better than the camera of lg Optimus. It's much sharper on the arc. Also, There seems to be a white gradient in the photos taken by Lg Optimus. Especially on this pic, http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]_113.jpg&idReview=585&idPage=3
I must say that the sgs II's photos are sharper than on both Arc's and Lg's BUT I see more details in some of the Arc's photos. The brown patches in the leaves in this picture http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]_213.jpg&idReview=585&idPage=3 is more prominent in the arc's sample. I don't know if this is some sort of better colour reproduction. Just my opinion.
[ This Message was edited by: Shino03 on 2011-04-10 03:34 ] |
Sassho
Joined: Nov 03, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Which pictures are better ? Don't look in EXIF please 
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
 |
Ravanelli
Joined: Feb 23, 2009
Posts: 78
From: Ina
PM |
@sassho
I really don't like pic no.4, the color seems unatural. Arc absolutely no.6 without seeing EXIF.
Arc pics look brighter than the others...
[ This Message was edited by: Ravanelli on 2011-04-10 10:16 ] |
justus333
Joined: Apr 21, 2007
Posts: 163
PM |
some of mine. Bear in mind, Im a lousy fotographer!
    |
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Nice justus
 |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
Pleasant to watch those pictures.
a w a r e |
Sassho
Joined: Nov 03, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Photos by Optimus 2x has more detail than ARC/SGS2 , has biggest file size , but are very noisy. ARC has better color reproduction, but photos little blury and has little file size. SGS2 has balanced camera - sharp detail, normal file size and good color reproduction. All phones not are photo-design devices. |
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Very very big wheels on this Hummer ! (28') 
 |
Ralf555
Joined: Aug 22, 2010
Posts: 3
PM |
On 2011-04-10 10:46:01, Sassho wrote:
Which pictures are better ? Don't look in EXIF please
First comparison= Picture one the best
Second comparison= Picture two the best |
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
 |
hibiskus
Joined: Oct 12, 2010
Posts: 65
From: Serbia
PM |
On 2011-04-10 14:07:33, davidsic wrote:
Very very big wheels on this Hummer ! (28')
Was this with auto mode? It should be taken with appropriate night mode :/ |
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Yes auto scene i thing.
 |
|
|
Posted: 2011-04-09 20:50
