Author |
any news for new improve camdriver C905 ? |
panonski Joined: Dec 13, 2008 Posts: 345 From: Croatia PM |
Does anyone trying something or it is all on dead spot .... |
|
superleeds27 Joined: Jun 04, 2004 Posts: > 500 PM |
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=179240 |
mauasca Joined: Oct 04, 2007 Posts: 196 From: Pavia (Italy) PM, WWW
|
The best results (with less noise in the countryside) I have obtained them by turning off the stabilizer.
the stabilizer, being digital, not optical, tends to increase the ISO and consequently to increase the noise fondo.PS with the stabilizer off, the pictures weigh a little more ', circa 2700/2900 KB 0_o
February out 'a new firmware and hopefully in a patch for this bug, because I think that now the CamModders can not do much to improve quality and reduce the noise at least with this firmware ^ _ ^
S.E.C905_R1FA035_Modded Satio U1 Black R2KA006 hack O_O X10i White Android 2.1 Rooted no brand_MW600
|
panonski Joined: Dec 13, 2008 Posts: 345 From: Croatia PM |
On 2009-01-22 20:43:27, mauasca wrote:
The best results (with less noise in the countryside) I have obtained them by turning off the stabilizer.
I do that right time when I was first use camera, because I realize logically the quality must be little less. Stabilizer do this job in a way to doesn't allow lowly shutter speed ( pics are much sharper if you have unsteady hands ) and that means the ISO must be higher, and that's finally results with more NOISE.
the stabilizer, being digital, not optical, tends to increase the ISO and consequently to increase the noise fondo.
What I just told you
PS with the stabilizer off, the pictures weigh a little more ', circa 2700/2900 KB 0_o
February out 'a new firmware and hopefully in a patch for this bug, because I think that now the CamModders can not do much to improve quality and reduce the noise at least with this firmware ^ _ ^
Hope so.... But I wondered how cammodders may do much improvements on other SE phones,
and with this one seems to be hard job to do that... :? |
panonski Joined: Dec 13, 2008 Posts: 345 From: Croatia PM |
tnx, but that was some time ago....and I already now it |
gtr83 Joined: Sep 27, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Indonesia PM |
@panonski
I thought you were going to sell your C905?
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
panonski Joined: Dec 13, 2008 Posts: 345 From: Croatia PM |
I was planing to. . .but I realize that would be maybe stupid and unnececeary move. .My phone is bought just because of cam, and that will may be improve. . .This phone has warranty ( i beleive 2 years )
and that means, I got more time to let him... . to go f**ked
...
|
Raiderski Joined: Jul 03, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Poland, Hell, Mountains PM, WWW
|
wait for next firmware but don't expect miracles... in order to avoid disappointments
|
panonski Joined: Dec 13, 2008 Posts: 345 From: Croatia PM |
On 2009-01-23 11:25:58, Raiderski wrote:
wait for next firmware but don't expect miracles... in order to avoid disappointments
I'm not
Tell me one thing.... I already post that question before...How's that older SE phones may much improve in photoarea by modding camdriver,
and this one not ? Where is the difference? I see on all topics mini miracles in camdrives
and with this phone I seen in cammoding ......well, almost nothing |
number1 Joined: Sep 12, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne PM |
The older se's have less megapixels so less noise reduction increasing the sharpness has a bigger effect, also they have a larger iso range the old 2megapixels are 100-800 with lower isos prodcuing noticeable better quality , so just reducing the iso a little bit means alot better quality. With the C905 and it's iso range of 64-200 theres not much difference in the noise reduction in iso 64 or 200 it's just extremly heavy all the time and noise levels are about the same, the sharpness doesn't seem to have a big effect probley because the powerful noise reduction just smooths it out again, if you add colour saturation to the c905 camdriver you could improve the colour but theres not much to be done in turns of quality unless you could tweak the noise reduction but then you'd have to choose between noise or detail, se clearly choose to remove all noise reguardless of detail. The C905's output photos are a product of the post-processing/noise reduction more than anything else.
|
panonski Joined: Dec 13, 2008 Posts: 345 From: Croatia PM |
only between 64 and 200 ?!!!
Men! This is ...Can I tell the word .. ? It's start with Sh...
Tnx, number1, I realize now where is the problem ... You have just no space to improve anything here....
|
number1 Joined: Sep 12, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne PM |
With a correctly tuned modded camdriver you would notice a slight improvement in quality but nothing huge the 8mp on tiny cmos sensor isn't the best hardware to work with. In future if looking for a good cam phone go for something with the less megapixels on it's tiny cmos sensor unless it has a ccd or huge sized cmos sensor( the phone would be the size of DSLR), 1,2,3 megapixels all work ok on the current small cmos sensors anything more and you might notice the quality goes down. the C905 has a slightly larger Exor sensor so it could probley hold 4-5 megapixels with good quality pics.
|
Raiderski Joined: Jul 03, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Poland, Hell, Mountains PM, WWW
|
modding was easier and results were visible almost imediately. this doesn't work well for C905 any more
|
number1 Joined: Sep 12, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne PM |
Yea even less hope with the new 12mp cam phones se are gonna accounce, probley 0 hope.
|
panonski Joined: Dec 13, 2008 Posts: 345 From: Croatia PM |
I wondered,
is on C905 larger sensor than on others SE's ?
Like K850 or C902?
|
|