| Author |
SE Rank 5th Globally |
SilveR.
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
SE was third, according Strategy Analytic . Nokia 38.4, Smasung 17.9 LG 8.7 SE. 82. and Motorola 84, and others plus apple 20.3%
--------------------- |
|
|
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
For Q4 your figures are correct, but I think 5:th place discussed is on year basis. However, it seems Moto is rolling downhills faster than SE, so the 4:th place on year basis for SE does not seem too far away.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2009-01-24 01:38 ] |
mario2004
Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
On 2009-01-23 12:03:39, SilveR. wrote:
SE was third, according Strategy Analytic . Nokia 38.4, Smasung 17.9 LG 8.7 SE. 82. and Motorola 84, and others plus apple 20.3%
The numbers you have correctly posted do not show them as 'third' ! Is it safe to assume,you are confusing your self ?  (motorola 8.4 and se 8.2)
'Better govern our selfs the wrong way, then be governed by 'others' the right way.'
- Robert Mugabe - Freedom fighter comarade, peoples hero and President of Zimbabwe. |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
SE should stop labeling low-end products as Cyber-shot and Walkman phones; it's no wonder that SONY refused to let SE use the PSP brand seeing how low-key all those phones are. For me the only phones that are worth their price are those that start with a 7 on their name with the current naming convention and upwards. But the 9's series are too pricey, with the only exception being W902. A very underrated phone.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Eldar once wrote in a review,that SE are going on a total restructuring and that prices would cme down from the mid of this year. |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
 I thought you guys stopped listening to Eldar cause he was being "mean" to 
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
I never listened to Eldar. Rather I read his articles He has every right to be mean but he was a bit too subjective.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2009-01-24 05:37:53, gtr83 wrote:
SE should stop labeling low-end products as Cyber-shot and Walkman phones;
Completely agree. The label simply loose its meaning when its found in low end products. |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
Im just wondering how are SE still able to make decent phones with high specs like the X1, C905, W902 etc. . .and yet are under Motorola who dont realy have anything worth talking about in their portfolio like the C905, i expected SE to be atleast above Moto cause i thought X1 and C905 were selling well,guess i was wrong. 
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
On 2009-01-24 23:36:59, GUCCI.011 wrote:
Im just wondering how are SE still able to make decent phones with high specs like the X1, C905, W902 etc. . .and yet are under Motorola who dont realy have anything worth talking about in their portfolio like the C905...
Because Motorola sell GSM and CDMA phones by the truckload in the US where they are still #1 in sales. Its in all other markets that they have lost their appeal. SE and Nokia still don't make much of a dent in the US market; I think Nokia are 5th in the US with SE barely troubling the statisticians... 
|
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Moto Q4- 19 million
SE Q4-24.4 million |
rsdsgd
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 140
From: Pakistan
PM |
I'm conscious about SE just becoz they are the pioneers to put a Digicam.. in mobile phone (Dont forget 'auto focus' functionality).
They also have a brilliant history regarding music field. So on these two strong basis they must lead the mobile fon industry & should keep it up.
But now the runner-ups have reached SE,
SE...! keep innova8ing (just lyk Samsung have done) |
Brightspark
Joined: Aug 19, 2007
Posts: 326
From: UK
PM |
On 2009-01-28 19:35:44, rsdsgd wrote:
I'm conscious about SE just becoz they are the pioneers to put a Digicam.. in mobile phone (Dont forget 'auto focus' functionality).
They also have a brilliant history regarding music field. So on these two strong basis they must lead the mobile fon industry & should keep it up.
But now the runner-ups have reached SE,
SE...! keep innova8ing (just lyk Samsung have done)
you are deluding yourself.
-SE did not put out the first camera phone, nor where they the first to put out autofocus on a camera phone
-SE have never been innovative in anything
-music-wise, they have been well and truly surpassed. they now trail the top 4 brands in audio quality. their walkman brand was based on the 'sony' walkman, but sony never invented the walkman.
On 2009-01-25 04:42:20, se_dude wrote:
Moto Q4- 19 million
SE Q4-24.4 million
thats only for that one quarter mate. the thraed is about how they have all done in 2008, and SE are 5th whilst moto are 4th.
[ This Message was edited by: Brightspark on 2009-01-28 20:31 ] |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
SE not innovating? That's not true mate. Who do you think invented the swivel form factor? And who was the first to put a xenon flash and an active lens cover on a cameraphone? How about the first phone with an inbuilt FM transmitter? Those are just off the top of my head.
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2009-01-28 20:38 ] |
gola
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM |
I thought it's Motorola that came with the first swivel mobile...
"Getting wisdom is the wisest thing you can do!"
Proverbs 4: 7 |
|
|
Posted: 2009-01-23 12:03
