Author |
C905 camdrivers test (original vs raiderski vs darkmagician vs rippi) |
eltoffer Joined: Nov 01, 2007 Posts: 348 PM |
Hi as i wished to know wich one is the best for now i realized this comparition, it is not the best one but it will give us an idea on what cam is better for now in my own opinion the best now is DARKMAGICIAN because of the compresion JPEG and the sharppnes this setting are the highest of all camdrivers.
Here you have two pics with all of these drivers
if anyone wants to make his own comparition please post in here edit this post and add the pics just to make it more clear
A-> Original
B-> Raiderski
C-> Darkmagician
D-> Rippi
Automatic
http://www.4shared.com/file/76133377/75c505f0/1a_online.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/76133501/d76a4ab0/1brs.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/76133625/e0775272/1cd.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/76133716/53913a3c/1dr.html
Macro
http://www.4shared.com/file/76133783/f23975fa/2a_online.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/76133857/4ba68893/2brs.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/76134033/8955820d/2cd.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/76134132/ff90d8ac/2dr.html
PD i couldnt attached them in "good" size but these are the links in FULL size save it into your pc and compare it from there
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2008-12-15 23:00 ]
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2008-12-15 23:04 ] |
|
Raiderski Joined: Jul 03, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Poland, Hell, Mountains PM, WWW
|
there will be no more upgrades in my code, so you can eliminate it from further comparisions anyway I have some conclusions...
1. 3rd pic in Macro doesn't fit to other. I don't think it can be compared with other
2. sharpness is very interesting thing. although I and Rippi used max sharpness value, result is not any better than in original driver. Darkmagician used value 06 (max is 08) and sharpness looks much better. hmm, why lower sharpness value gave better result than higher value? is 08 reserved only for 'document' scene? is real max value lower than 08? 07? 06? questions for C905 modders
3. compression, I disagree. file size cannot be considered only as quivalent of compression ratio. quality in your shots:
auto: 90%, 92%, 91%, 92%
macro: 90%, 92%, 93%, 92%
as you can see, we are talking about minor variations in quality. in fact it's not even worth to mention about compression
thanks for comparision! this sharpness thing is really interesting
|
titus1 Joined: Jul 27, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: here PM, WWW
|
darkmagician it is |
vudu70 Joined: Apr 15, 2008 Posts: 383 From: Hungary PM, WWW
|
Darkmagician's sharpness setting is the prime, but each auto pic smudged/rude in full size (see grass and fine details). 8 MPixel is too much for this phone senzor. Mighty works are not.
_________________
K810i Golden Ivory+Raiderski Supermode camdriver v6.5.2 + Robie™ v1.1 ZAPFmix acoustic->Pics
[ This Message was edited by: vudu70 on 2008-12-16 11:02 ] |
DarKMaGiCiaN Joined: Aug 25, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM |
first I want to thank you eltoffer for you test ^_^
there will be no more upgrades in my code, so you can eliminate it from further comparisions
that means we will see you in C905 modd one day as you alrady said that
you couldnt modd the K800 camera driver when they asked you ( you were using the w800 that time ) and now your k800 camera driver is one of the best camera driver in all the word ^_^
sharpness is very interesting thing. although I and Rippi used max sharpness value, result is not any better than in original driver. Darkmagician used value 06 (max is 08) and sharpness looks much better. hmm, why lower sharpness value gave better result than higher value? is 08 reserved only for 'document' scene? is real max value lower than 08? 07? 06? questions for C905 modders
from my test on C905 I found that
#COM_EVENT(56,XX);
is not the only thing which control the sharpness
jpeg compress (to be exact what comes in compressing line code ) do that as will
if you compair between my driver in 8MP high vs 8MP low compress you'll see deferent in the sharpness and even the color
in my modded camera driver I set the sharpness to 06 because 08 is over sharpness and sometims it gives horrible effects when you see it in fill size
see the examples :
but each auto pic smudged/rude in full size (see grass and fine details). 8 MPixel is too much for this phone senzor. Mighty works are not.
that because of the noise reducer and it is FW issue
[ This Message was edited by: DarKMaGiCiaN on 2008-12-16 18:16 ] |
vudu70 Joined: Apr 15, 2008 Posts: 383 From: Hungary PM, WWW
|
Unhappily that's no simply fw issue
Sony Xperia Z2A user |
peputinho Joined: Dec 31, 2008 Posts: 4 PM |
Thanks + Congratulations
Im from spain, my last mcam was a KU990 , but my new C905 is a real CAM.
Thanks a lot, your camdriver works very fine |
masada1971 Joined: Jun 05, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2008-12-31 20:11:53, peputinho wrote:
Thanks + Congratulations
Im from spain, my last mcam was a KU990 , but my new C905 is a real CAM.
Thanks a lot, your camdriver works very fine
which one do you use?raider's,rippi's or darkmagician's??i use darkmagicians with amazing results!!Happy New Year everybody  |
peputinho Joined: Dec 31, 2008 Posts: 4 PM |
On 2008-12-31 21:13:12, masada1971 wrote:
On 2008-12-31 20:11:53, peputinho wrote:
Thanks + Congratulations
Im from spain, my last mcam was a KU990 , but my new C905 is a real CAM.
Thanks a lot, your camdriver works very fine
which one do you use?raider's,rippi's or darkmagician's??i use darkmagicians with amazing results!!Happy New Year everybody
Im trying Darkmagicians one and i must say im very surprised with its quality
(sorry for my english, im spanish)
|
ceaser2008 Joined: Jul 14, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Surat, India PM |
@Darkmagician
I read the comparisons. And i am moved by the pics. Is your drive compatible with k850i ? I want to test it. If yes, please send the link to download it. Thank you |
DarKMaGiCiaN Joined: Aug 25, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM |
no the driver is just for c905
^_^ |
superleeds27 Joined: Jun 04, 2004 Posts: > 500 PM |
Thanks for this.
Ill give DarkMagicians a test
|
|