| Author |
K850 Vs C902...(pictures) |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
thought i start a new thread..(the c902 thread is just for c902 pics i think)
so here you go:
...(i tried some document shooting on landscape, nature with c902,,,woooaaahhh, what a sharpness it became)
super sharpness c902 vs k850
k850
c902
document c902...little to low EV... really nice thick colors / shadows
now starts my c902 to produce good colors... they are little better then k850(even indoor)
taken in quite low light
c902
k850
c902
k850
the photo flash is not super crapy...it still better then c702/N95 (ordinary) LED technique.... but if i stand 3-4m away Xenon kills like nothing.
here 2m...you see my dear C902 laying there waiting for the unknown..he he
c902
k850
c902...daylight
k850
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-16 22:40 ] |
|
|
Killfr3nzy
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Arabia and Hollanda
PM |
no big winner if you'd ask me |
darknoob
Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
agree, but C902 is 10mm and K850 is 18mm, so I would buy C902 instead of K850. |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-07-16 11:24:38, plankgatan wrote:
thought i start a new thread..(the c902 thread is just for c902 pics i think)
so here you go:
...(i tried some document shooting on landscape, nature with c902,,,woooaaahhh, what a sharpness it became)
super sharpness c902 vs k850
You need to post full size photos for a true comparison of sharpness. Downsized photos will show exposure and color.
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-07-16 14:29:13, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2008-07-16 11:24:38, plankgatan wrote:
thought i start a new thread..(the c902 thread is just for c902 pics i think)
so here you go:
...(i tried some document shooting on landscape, nature with c902,,,woooaaahhh, what a sharpness it became)
super sharpness c902 vs k850
You need to post full size photos for a true comparison of sharpness. Downsized photos will show exposure and color.
Fair comparison would be at a resolution at which people view their photos, which is what plank posted. No one here, i'm pretty sure, has a monitor running at 2500x1200 resolution so taking a pic at that resolution is pointless. It may tell the true story about the camera, but its pointless.
|
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
Again new topic?!? ccc
You open one...
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=172504
|
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
hi plank...
nice comparison...
i think that you can now admit that the K850 camera driver has a very bad problem with RED colours... 
and please,.......please,,, don't resize your pictures with paint. |
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
K850 pics sucks,bigtime!!c902 can produce far better colours... |
kenoby
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Posts: 407
From: 404
PM |
Nice improvement over K850i, good comparison.
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-07-16 14:40:53, QVGA wrote:
Fair comparison would be at a resolution at which people view their photos, which is what plank posted. No one here, i'm pretty sure, has a monitor running at 2500x1200 resolution so taking a pic at that resolution is pointless. It may tell the true story about the camera, but its pointless.
That depends on what you do with your photos. Yes, if you never print them but always view on your monitor, then the 5 MP (and the 8 MP of the C905!) is wasted space. The instruction "Click on photo to view in full size" under each photo in the Photos gallery is probably always ignored. But every pixel counts for those of us that like to print the odd photo that turn out great and sometimes then at larger sizes (A4, 10R or larger).
We can turn this the other way. Which size should be used to allow everyone to view photos without using scrollbars? There are probably a lot of users out there that view this site on their phones. They may be content with thumbnails and anything fancier than the T610 with its 0.1 MP camera is too much for them.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-07-16 19:12 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
camera test between C902 vs N95 (8gb)......and C902 is the winner (in this case : )
N95 (8gb)
c902
translation... C902 produce better details & contrast, and N95 8gb produce little more dynamic colors...but in the end C902 looks better...bla bla
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-16 22:37 ] |
darknoob
Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
the N95 8GB picture is better =/ |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
eeehhh. in your dreams.......( i really REALLY guess that someone should say so)
look closely man... c902 is way sharper...check the leafs for a example
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-16 22:45 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
Full sized nokia pics are a big smear, they have the most aggressive post-processing ive ever seen all detail is lost despite there good colours. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
the best thing with C902, is its so simple to shoot with... its the best "point & shoot" phone i ever tried..(yes, even "easier" then k800/k810).
you just open the lens cover and press.....thats it. (no need to adjust brightness & color-profiles. 
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-17 00:22 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-16 11:24
