| Author |
HTC Touch Diamond vs. Samsung i900 Omnia: Head-to-Head :Review-Gsmarena |
technical-expert
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Pacific Rim
PM |
HTC Touch Diamond vs. Samsung i900 Omnia: Head-to-Head
New window
New window
http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_t[....]sung_i900_omnia-review-262.php
Bought to u First on Esato By TECHNICAL EXPERT
TECHNICAL EXPERT
Always Bringing u the Latest Information & Updates
[ This Message was edited by: technical-expert on 2008-07-02 14:15 ]
[ This Message was edited by: technical-expert on 2008-07-02 14:19 ] |
|
|
apolloa
Joined: Jul 27, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK
PM |
Well I'll reply 
Just looked through, very good review, I do like the Diamond still gggrrrrr. I don't know as they have done a lot to get rid of the crappy Windows interface. SE seems to have done a fantastic job with the X1 though in this area. But the touch has a rubbish battery, trade off for the size? |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan Mobile: i450
PM, WWW
|
No technical expert opinions on it? shocking
_________________
say hi to my widow for me
[ This Message was edited by: QVGA on 2008-07-02 17:01 ] |
Peio
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: 146
From: Euskadi
PM |
Nice review
Just a word about those words in "omnia over diamond":
"
# Landscape QWERTY keyboard (Diamond has one but only in browser)
# Auto screen rotation is available in all applications and can be switched off
"
That's not true anymore, there's now a little program called "Gsen" that allows auto screen rotation in every application, using the G-sensor. I don't get why HTC didn't activate it by default though
|
Dups!
Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: +2 GMT
PM |
For me design-wise the Samsung wins. As for other things I would have to mix and match but the HTC would provide a bulk of the features.
It's not what you do or even how you do it but in what state of mind you do it.
|
pmerryman
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Oldham,Uk
PM |
Looks wise, I would have to say the HTC Touch Diamond, as I think the samsung have copied some of the looks of the iphone.
|
himlims_nl
Joined: Apr 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
still both got slow menu's due the use of WM
aaarght hurry up with your android release
|
Dups!
Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: +2 GMT
PM |
@pmerryman
True, but they made the design look even better than the iphone IMO. I just love it!
_________________
 GH688, MC 6000 DeskTop Charger, R320s, R600s.  P910i.
Motorola v8.
[ This Message was edited by: EMS06 on 2008-07-03 12:55 ] |
Boinng
Joined: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Petersfield, UK
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-07-03 13:51:27, himlims_nl wrote:
still both got slow menu's due the use of WM
aaarght hurry up with your android release
There's nothing inherently slow about WM - in fact if they stripped off all their own Touch guff and just used the WM interface, both phones would be lightning fast. It's the optimisation of their own software that's the problem here, and will doubtless dog their first Android efforts too.
t28s -> t39m -> t68i -> P800 -> P910i -> M600i -> HTC Tytn II -> iPhone 3G |
pmerryman
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Oldham,Uk
PM |
On 2008-07-03 13:52:54, EMS06 wrote:
@pmerryman
True, but they made the design look even better than the iphone IMO. I just love it!
_________________
GH688, MC 6000 DeskTop Charger, R320s, R600s. P910i.
Motorola v8.
[ This Message was edited by: EMS06 on 2008-07-03 12:55 ]
IMO alot of the samsungs look very similar, and this one fits into this category.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-02 15:12
