| Author |
Post your Pictures/Videos taken by C905 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
thought i post some big nice sharp C905 pics  all pics is posted in 1024 x 768.
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 09:22 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2010-09-15 15:52 ] |
|
|
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
Isn't this thread too early to be created? 
btw, i loved the second pic very much, it still shows the 8 megapixel details(albeit some excessive N-R application) in purple fringing-free environment.
10 years at Esato |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
lovely pics but way too early.
|
JiSm
Joined: Nov 08, 2007
Posts: 404
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
|
Haha, clever man! Noone else can post pics in here for ages! - Still, what amazing pics man. (I have K850 - so I guess any other pics look amazing HAHA)
"Back in the land of the long white cloud!" |
darknoob
Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
my K850 by C905
full size:
http://www.jup.co.il/files/d121cc28a0.jpg |
strizlow800
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM |
Yeah, the outdoor shots taken with C905 are awesome 
|
Wizardz
Joined: Jun 14, 2008
Posts: 43
From: Singapore
PM |
It seems like either the indoor or close up shot aren't that clear. You'll see some distortion. |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2008-06-25 06:31:55, Wizardz wrote:
It seems like either the indoor or close up shot aren't that clear. You'll see some distortion.
Close up shots were also taken indoors, and indoor shots are typically noisy(that's if the software N-R is not present) unless N-R is applied and result to detail loss just like what many brands are doing
10 years at Esato |
ch33sehead
Joined: Sep 13, 2006
Posts: 34
PM |
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone. |
Alf Nif
Joined: Dec 01, 2003
Posts: 426
From: Sweden
PM |
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!! 
Alf Nif
formerly known as seiunUsagi |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-06-27 09:17:19, Alf Nif wrote:
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
Well, you can set the ISO on A200 cyber-shots as well.
|
Alf Nif
Joined: Dec 01, 2003
Posts: 426
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-06-27 09:45:37, NightBlade wrote:
Well, you can set the ISO on A200 cyber-shots as well.
I haven't played with any cybershot phone at all.. My latest phone is the Z610.
Now I gotto find out if I want the G900 or C905.
I think I'd go for design and get the C905...
Sorry, just realised I got off topic 
_________________
Alf Nif
formerly known as seiunUsagi
[ This Message was edited by: Alf Nif on 2008-06-27 08:50 ] |
ch33sehead
Joined: Sep 13, 2006
Posts: 34
PM |
On 2008-06-27 09:17:19, Alf Nif wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
No, I just peeked at the EXIF data on darknoob's photo. I don't own the C905 myself.
Somehow I doubt they will put manual controls on a cell phone. |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
In another thread it was concluded the C905 darknoob used is an older prototype (low light pictures taken with newer protos seem to be less grainy).
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Most cybershot phones (at lest the more high-end one) usually have image stabilizer. But nothing fancy as optical or sensor-shifting. Cybershots only lowers the ISO when image stabilizer is enabled to my best knowledge.
|
pravin_i
Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 6
PM |
how u got c905?
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-06-24 09:22
Sony Ericsson software/hardware support! 
