| Author |
Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-07-21 09:42:11, alex_on wrote:
@perfect
can you post some orginal full size photos taken with LG KF750 Secret in low light conditions ?
no he cant... Secret have not some good low light camera, because of its agressive post-processing, (which means worse details, especially in low light).
-----------------------------------------
@number1...hope you kidding.... ITS A LOW LIGHT PICTURE FOR GOD SAKE....so of course it have less details & sharpness...
take a look at some pics instead with NORMAL lightness
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-21 09:44 ] | |
|
heyumf
Joined: Oct 25, 2007
Posts: 67
PM |
 |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
PERFECT has already posted full sized Secret pics in many lighting conditions in other threads here and that's why to me, he's one of the most credible people in Esato.
All i can say is that we eventually need balanced reviews here. Not hypes. |
ianeb
Joined: Jul 13, 2008
Posts: 14
PM |
You can't honestly say that you think the picture of Mc-Drive is a good one? It is horrible, the colours are way over saturated and far too bright, it is horible.
I honestly can't believe this thread is becoming a debate over which phone takes more sharper, realistic pictures. Have you guys forgotten the fact that these are PHONES with tiny little lenses for taking SNAP SHOTS?
Yes thats right, point and shoot snap shots. If you want ultra sharp close ups and night shots that could have been taken during the day, get a proper digital camera.
We take camera phones far too seriously these days, technology is improving all the time, but until they improve the sensors having more megapixels doesn't mean a thing. The C905 wont necessarily be a better camera than the C902 or even the K810. I am getting it for its larger screen and WiFi rather than its impressive sounding camera.
Seriously guys, the C902 takes very nice shots, they are best viewed in a cropped/smaller size because at full size they look horrible. I wouldn't dream of using my phone to take pictures and print at anything above 6x4 anyway.
Enjoy them for what they are, camera PHONES. not Digital Cameras. |
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
C902 (auto mode, exposure decrease -0,3) 
Real size
http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/1758/dsc08130oj8.jpg
[ This Message was edited by: davidsic on 2008-07-21 10:05 ] |
sony4ever
Joined: Jul 21, 2008
Posts: 20
PM |
hi every body how are you...
im confused should i buy the c902i and sell my k850i because it has more spec. and it looks better than the k850i plz reply |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
On 2008-07-21 10:46:14, Amras wrote:
All i can say is that we eventually need balanced reviews here. Not hypes.
That’s exactly my thought
Thanks for the compliment.
@se dude: i don’t obstruct your enjoyment, i have posted one Secret’s pic after plank has mentioned this phone, your post look to me stupid.
@alex on: like i have already said the Secret has bad performance in low light, so i don’t shot with this light condition.
@ianeb: the colors are oversaturated but it’s way better than C902, you are happy with C902’s resized pics but you say that “at full size they look horrible”...points of view are subjective...
|
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
number1, yea post processing on k800i is horrible(in some situations)  but k800i dont have chromatic aberrations...
Look this:
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
@davidsic...awesome picture man
--------------------------------------------
c902 camera is just best (for its size) ....(what i see, its only N82 who can shoot with this quality, but still, it have little less sharpness & details compared to this Cybershoot monster). have really done their job with this cam driver. perfect balance between noise & color-saturation.
sharpness...yeh man...(my daughter have so blond hair so the picture just bounce off...he he)
close up picture on my quite new Mazda... really great car actaully
nice shadows
colors
check the full size unbelievable quality
indoor
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-21 16:41 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-30 12:26 ] |
ianeb
Joined: Jul 13, 2008
Posts: 14
PM |
PERFECT was is the point of you posting on this thread, you own a LG Secret, do you own a C902? Do you have any photo's to post from a C902?
It seems your just interested in knocking the C902 in favour of your secret. Starta thread if you want to debate and knock other products.
The picture you posted is horrible, I couldn't care less if it was taken with the N82, N95, C902 or a Canon 450D SLR it is a horrible picture imo. The colours look as though they have been over processed in a paint program, the sharpness is fairly poor and it does not look realistic.
All I was trying to say is for most people the quality of pics the C902 takes are very good considering the size of the phone. I for one never view or print pictures at full size.
This thread is for showing pictures taken by the C902, if you want a discussion about wich phone is better etc, lets move it to another thread aye
Great photo's again plank...
Some really nice colours and the quality of the pic before viewing at full size is very good. Keep em coming |
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
too bad PERFECT, you've done pretty good pics with your k850i, now if you're happy with korean thinks no problems with that.
It's funny too see people searching hard too find bad thinks in pics taken by SE's camera phones, i don't watch it always in real size, it's good enough to watch it on pc, good to print it, i'm satified with C902, a bit better than the K850i.
If you don't shoot with a SE...your head is gonna go up his ass ! lol (i saw Hancock last night) 
Thanks Plank.
Sorry for my english not perfect.
[ This Message was edited by: davidsic on 2008-07-21 17:06 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
Plank what scene did you used in above pics? I didn't saw worthy successor of K800 but now looks like C902 is light in the tunnel
|
dancingfate
Joined: Sep 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
PM |
My pics with C902.
Low light. Macro. No flash. No edited.
Indoor. Auto setting. No edited.
Apple iPhone 4, HTC Evo 3D, HTC Sensation, HTC Inspire 4G, HTC Desire S, HTC Wildfire, S001, SO905iCS, T650 (Gold & Green), C901, W800, K660, K700, Beibei (G702), Severine (DEAD) |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
Ianeb, have you read what i have wrote? Knocking the C902? I never think it or that my phone is the “camera king“(if you read above you can see that i mention too the bad performance about Secret), if i don’t like some aspects of C902’s pics i comment them, so, where is the problem?
Sincerely i don’t care your opinion.
David, probably not all the people usually see own pics resized, otherwise how 5 Mp. can be useful? Think my next phone will be C90...5 
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-07-21 18:08:26, Raiderski wrote:
Plank what scene did you used in above pics? I didn't saw worthy successor of K800 but now looks like C902 is light in the tunnel
auto mostly...besides of close up..then is document (same as macro)..or sometimes face detection
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-21 20:26 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-30 12:28 ] | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-07-21 10:41
