| Author |
Why Only 65K Colors for WM devices ? |
WhyBe
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Ohio, USA
PM |
Here is some excellent info on why 262K colors is rare among WinMo devices.
[ This Message was edited by: WhyBe on 2008-05-23 04:55 ] |
|
|
Keiki
Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 160
From: Valhalla
PM |
Good articles 
Even i hardly differs 65k colors and 16.7m colors in my pc screen
This message was posted from BlackBerry 8900 |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-23 06:58:00, Keiki wrote:
Good articles
Even i hardly differs 65k colors and 16.7m colors in my pc screen
wow somebody's got bad eye sight
|
Keiki
Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 160
From: Valhalla
PM |
Nah, just try it on your pc. Set it to 16bit and 24bit, you hardly tells what the diffrenent.
Event theres a diffrent its only a slight. You woldnt notice it anyway when you concentrating doing your application on your pc.
Its the same for mobile device, i think the one the one that make the color seems beautiful is [Contrast, resulution and dot pitch] color depth is also have count but maybe not a significant one.
This message was posted from BlackBerry 8900 |
fumi_moon
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Posts: 50
PM |
I notice a difference on my desktop, the icons shadow is darker and looks very jagged, and my background picture does not look smooth, so for me I notice quite a difference.
On a small 3" (yes small compared to a computer screen) screen like the X1 I think it will be harder to tell the difference.
Current mobilephone: P1i and my now old K800i, and before that W800i, V800i, Z600i, and T310. Waiting for X10. |
Brightspark
Joined: Aug 19, 2007
Posts: 326
From: UK
PM |
the reason why is because WM is a piece of junk. it's so inefficient that it has to run on lower colours just to prevent it from slowing down to a snails pace.
[ This Message was edited by: Brightspark on 2008-05-23 21:12 ] |
WhyBe
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Ohio, USA
PM |
On 2008-05-23 22:07:22, Brightspark wrote:
the reason why is because WM is a piece of junk...
...as opposed to what OS? |
Brightspark
Joined: Aug 19, 2007
Posts: 326
From: UK
PM |
On 2008-05-24 05:42:16, WhyBe wrote:
On 2008-05-23 22:07:22, Brightspark wrote:
the reason why is because WM is a piece of junk...
...as opposed to what OS?
as opposed to other 'mainstream' OSs with at least 1% market share. for example, the tip of the iceberg can be glimpsed by comparing the hardware requirements of other OSs compared to WM and then doing some benchmarking.
[ This Message was edited by: Brightspark on 2008-05-24 17:39 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-05-23 05:20
