| Author |
Sony Ericsson C902 Cyber-shot discussion |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yeah your right. I think its just that those early pics look horrid so I have my fingers crossed. I have to say though I think the lens cover system is a lot better than on the k850. Just hope its not one that can get loose after a while.
|
|
|
KingBooker5
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM |
On 2008-05-04 22:22:37, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-04 20:51:32, KingBooker5 wrote:
2' screen with 5mp camera? That is just terrible
I don't seem to get your association. Why is it so bad?
Today 2' is below average IMO, think about it this way, would you wan't to admire your "5mp" pictures on such a screen? Or Watch movies and browse pictures and music with the media manager with such a screen? I know I would'nt |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
The C902 is aimed at imaging not at all round multimedia consumption. Sure it has walkman interface but thats just standard now. 2.2 inches would have been better but thats SE for you.
|
KingBooker5
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM |
On 2008-05-05 00:14:42, bavlondon2 wrote:
The C902 is aimed at imaging not at all round multimedia consumption. Sure it has walkman interface but thats just standard now. 2.2 inches would have been better but thats SE for you.
I guess so.. making the phones crapper as usual. Kind of confusing. Any normal person would think they would aim to make their phones better. Oh well. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
n95 8gb screen size or e61 for example, those are screens to watch movie, enjoy pix made by the cam. not only qualitywise, also according its size.
|
Mige
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Posts: 453
PM |
c902 a great phone 
[addsig] |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-05 00:08:27, KingBooker5 wrote:
On 2008-05-04 22:22:37, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-04 20:51:32, KingBooker5 wrote:
2' screen with 5mp camera? That is just terrible
I don't seem to get your association. Why is it so bad?
Today 2' is below average IMO, think about it this way, would you wan't to admire your "5mp" pictures on such a screen? Or Watch movies and browse pictures and music with the media manager with such a screen? I know I would'nt
How would you be able to differentiate a 5MP from a 3MP photo on a QVGA screen? Frankly, you wouldn't even know if it's a VGA photo. |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yeah 2inch screen is really fine just for that. People just moan becasue there will always be something bigger than that so they assume everything else MUST be of equal to that. If they can make sure the pic quality at least reaches K850 standard then im sold. The more and more I watch videos on youtube the more I realy like the phone and design.
Is this the same lens/sensor as used on the k850 or is it smaller?
|
DCUK7
Joined: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool, UK
PM |
This phones makes you wonder how attractive the K850 could have been if they hadn't rushed it to market!
Formerly ~DC:UK~ |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yeah its really slim and well made in terms of design. Have any here actually used/held a C902 yet? I know obviously Laffen did I saw his clip on youtube but SE had all the new handsets at their new London flgship store a few months ago so im guessing some used it there too. Anyone here?
They still have the C702 but no longer the 902 unfortunatley.
This has the accelerometer aswell right?
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-05 00:59:45, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-05 00:08:27, KingBooker5 wrote:
On 2008-05-04 22:22:37, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-04 20:51:32, KingBooker5 wrote:
2' screen with 5mp camera? That is just terrible
I don't seem to get your association. Why is it so bad?
Today 2' is below average IMO, think about it this way, would you wan't to admire your "5mp" pictures on such a screen? Or Watch movies and browse pictures and music with the media manager with such a screen? I know I would'nt
How would you be able to differentiate a 5MP from a 3MP photo on a QVGA screen? Frankly, you wouldn't even know if it's a VGA photo.
You're saying that because you use a K810 which also has a minute screen. 2.0 is a joke and nothing else, nokia and samsung have them in their cheap low end phones. 2.4'' is the standard these days.
|
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yeah but its just the way SE want to go down. The fact that they use it more doesnt mean everyone wants it. Im quite happy with 2inch screen to be honest as my phone doesnt double up as a hardcore video player for me. On the contrary whilst I have had big and bulky phones like the N93i I still prefer small and slim models.
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-05 14:04:50, bavlondon2 wrote:
Yeah but its just the way SE want to go down. The fact that they use it more doesnt mean everyone wants it. Im quite happy with 2inch screen to be honest as my phone doesnt double up as a hardcore video player for me. On the contrary whilst I have had big and bulky phones like the N93i I still prefer small and slim models.
Didnt you feel weird using a 2.0inch screen after using a P1?
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
have never understand the point with super big screens ?
as long i dont use my phone for TV & Movies, i much rather have a smaller cell phone (with a little smaller screen, like 2.0" or 2.2") who fits my pocket nicer then a big, clumsy phone.
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-05 13:14 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-05 13:15 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-05 14:10:54, plankgatan wrote:
have never understand the point with super big screens ?
as long i dont use my phone for TV & Movies, i much rather have a smaller cell phone (with a little smaller screen, like 2.0" or 2.2") who fits my pocket nicer then a big, clumsy phone.
Then it means you think W910 is also clumsy, because it has a 2.4'' screen. How about p1 with its 2.6'' screen? That must be even more clumsy
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-05-04 23:09
