| Author |
G900 Another disappoinment? G900vsN82vsSamsung Soul |
technical-expert
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Pacific Rim
PM |
Lately im seeing lot of sample pic of c902 and g900 both seems to below average in taking Pictures.Just visit the link a comparison between G900/N82/
Samsung u900.I see G900 was way below expectation..I find lately SE is doing very poorly in camera department.
http://www.mobile-review.com/rev/sonyericsson-g900.shtml
Scroll down to see sample pics, the review is in russian
[ This Message was edited by: technical-expert on 2008-04-15 03:22 ] |
|
|
Fredricx
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 106
From: Sweden
PM |
G900 is not even released yet and you comparing its camera quality ? How do you know that the pic's you saw was taken with the final firmware ?
This message was posted from a WAP device |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
mr is usually testing protos... thats true
|
technical-expert
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Pacific Rim
PM |
On 2008-04-15 03:52:44, BobaFett wrote:
mr is usually testing protos... thats true
When did SE change the camera or upgraded, the final version is going to be the same, as we have seen with many other sony ericsson (k850 etc).So its safe to say its got poor camera quality.And not to forget the availability of these model is just one or two months away within which nothing is going to change
 K700-  W800- [W810]- W200-[ P990]=[Current]. One expert at esato that never lets u down technical-expert. |
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
time and time again this happens, its a proto.
However, the pic quality may still not improve. Though its best to wait for final release. Then you can judge 'properly'
You think proto cars are perfect? 
do you know why protos are made? if so, then you wouldnt make silly comments like that..........
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
even its a proto, those pix are horrible... but the link i posted in the c900 thread, there is also a pic of the sticker of the fone and it didnt seem for me a proto.
|
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
I think dont get your hope up too high that quality will improve a lot on final final firmware. These phones have worse sensor quality than K850. And we know how good K850 photos turned out to be. |
Residentevil
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Raccoon City, USA
PM, WWW
|
Let's just wait and see before everybody gets too wound up!
Tough times don't last, tough people do!
Free Tibet |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
i wont let this review change my mind from buying the g900. this will be my next phone.
translated version: http://translate.google.com/t[....]angpair=ru%7Cen&hl=es&ie=UTF-8
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
the link is empty, check it again .-)
|
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
oh no. it works for me.
|
G-Izzat
Joined: Nov 15, 2006
Posts: 482
From: MY
PM |
On 2008-04-15 04:51:32, BobaFett wrote:
the link is empty, check it again .-)
Works for me as well, mate. |
DeKosta
Joined: Nov 23, 2007
Posts: 291
From: Europe
PM |
It is a beautifull phone but if the photos really come out like that in the final version its thumbs down from me.
I wont buy it if my old K800 takes better pictures, but then i calculate the camera's performance really well in new purchases and my next buy will have to have a significant performance boost in the camdepartment so to speak.
But one could allways cross his fingers and hope that it was something wrong with the prototypes and that error is fixed in the final!
www.flickr.com/photos/dekosta/
- Illusion is the first of all pleasures. |
Keiki
Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 160
From: Valhalla
PM |
I think G900 is aiming for simplicity of smartphone for casual user not for power user.
I find it ridicoulus if you par it with n82. Because both of them aims for diffrent segment.
For me G900 isnt another dissapoinment (i wonder though why lately word "disappointment" make me sick) 
To me G900 is a casual, all rounder and pocket friendly touch based smartphone
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-04-15 06:10:00, Keiki wrote:
I think G900 is aiming for simplicity of smartphone for casual user not for power user.
I find it ridicoulus if you par it with n82. Because both of them aims for diffrent segment.
So what is the big difference between the G900 and the N82? The N82 has a built-in GPS. The G900 has a touchscreen. What else? What makes the N82 better suited for the power user than the G900?
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-04-15 06:32 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-04-15 03:43
K700- 
W800- 
