| Author |
no 16M yet? its 2008! |
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
256 colors is enough for me 
consider you have a 16mil screen and you are seeing a GIF! |
|
|
zub
Joined: Mar 19, 2004
Posts: 264
From: London
PM |
sharp phones have the best screens.
Sharp 904 = first ever vga res screen 640 x 480, have to say out of all the phones i have ever used the sharp phone's screen quality has always, in my opinion, been the best. Too bad the rest of the phone does'nt make up to it. I remember my GX20 having a screen way better than even most phones out today.
HTH
[ This Message was edited by: zub on 2008-02-13 07:36 ]
[ This Message was edited by: zub on 2008-02-13 07:37 ] |
Bhavv
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
I'm just gonna quote all this because it doesnt seem like 16m colour fanboys have bothered to look at it yet. 16m better then  256k my ass!
Look at the pictures before posting BS about screens not being good because they have less colours. This post by Amras wins this thread.
I think I said in the X1 Xperia thread that I wish that the Xperia had 16m colours, though, and I still support this Idea purely because it is a high end phone and will have an excessive price tag. For its price I would expect 16m colours as it is the flagship upcoming model and will cost a lot, but other then cost reasons I doubt it will have a bad screen because it is only 65k colours.
On 2008-02-12 06:11:56, Amras wrote:
Enough about the theory. Let's compare.
Both phones are rather new in term of release date so it's quite fair to compare both.
K770 (1.9", 256k color screen, TFT) Vs 6120 Classic (2", 16M color screen, TFT) - all set to maximum brightness.
K770 is always on the LEFT side
All the colors (black, white, red, green, blue) are obviously better in K770. K770 wins easily in term of brightness as well.
But interesting fact is K770's is not even the best display from SE yet. S500 is better.
S500 (similar to W580) - K770
In case you think my review is biased, I'm not the only one who reviewed this kind of thing.
W580 - U600 (both are TFT 256k colors)
see W580 Vs U600, then see this:
U600 - N95 (TFT 256k Vs TFT 16M)
W580 - W910 (both are TFT 256k colors)
N95 - N95 8GB
and don't ever conclude anything if you compare those 16M screens with K800. coz K800 display is WAY behind newest SE:
S500 - M600 - K800
viewing angle??
don't worry.. latest SE phones do the best:
Open your eyes please.. It's obvious that SE [u]latest[/u] displays are superb in term of brightness, saturation, contrast, viewing angle, direct sunlight view.
Now tell me what is so special about those 16M color screens?
You don't have to envy those Nokias' 16M color screens. Really.
As for me, I'd rather have a 256k color screen SE phone than a 16M color screen Nokia phone.
_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-02-12 05:48 ]
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
for me ( and i mention it so many times ) the best is still e60, e70 and e90 screens... so if any of u have the chance, take a look on those. trust me, se screens are a joke next to those... ( and other nokias aswell, just to be fair )
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Boba
I've seen the display of E70 and E90, and my K850 still whooped their arses in terms of colours.
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
i base my statement on personal experiences, especially i love to view pix and zoom on those. i tested k850 aswell, but according the pixels of it, it didnt offered me the same clear result after zooming, like e60. also at watching movies offer e70, e60 etc better quality as k850 for example.
|
Bhavv
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Bobba just go buy a nokia then. Problem solved. Some people always have to make a fuss over nothing. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
imo we are here to discuss fones and its features. so everybody may have her/his own point about things. so non of us is forced to have the same opinion like the other member, but to respect it is the standard for a good and useful discussion.
|
Bhavv
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yes but you havnt even seen or used the screen on the X1 yet so how can you be so sure its going to be bad? Its definately a lot better a screen then the k850 despite having less colours. I would wait and see what the screen is like before assuming it is going to be bad, but it definately will be much more advanced then the k850. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
that right, for a good comparison u have to have it in your hands, but the known specs are already point on some facts, like even x1 has got a high res screen, 65k colours are way less then 16m. its like the nokia n80, high res screen, but only 262k or like nokia 6131... so the menu looks clear and nice, but whne it comes to watch tv, video or pix, then u can clearly see the diffrences.
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
@Boba
This thread was about colours (stupid topic, either way), not resolution. The K850's colour saturation is miles better than than the Nokia ones. Same goes for general display quality. Lol, try pressing the inner display of the E90 or the N95 down a bit with your finger, do the same on K850 and compare!
|
DarkKrypt
Joined: May 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne,Australia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-14 01:43:01, Mizzle wrote:
@Boba
This thread was about colours (stupid topic, either way), not resolution. The K850's colour saturation is miles better than than the Nokia ones. Same goes for general display quality. Lol, try pressing the inner display of the E90 or the N95 down a bit with your finger, do the same on K850 and compare!
what a shizzle fcukin joke thread(stupid as mizzle would say) 
anyone know what color depth is :?
lol ^rhetorical question
VOTED One of the worst threads of '08
_________________
I own
K610,  DS970,  880, 910(r.i.p), 4Gb M2, HPM-83, MPS-70, 200, K550, P1i
[ This Message was edited by: DarkKrypt on 2008-02-14 00:46 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
yes, but for a nice screen u also have to have a good resolution, right? i aws once really amazed by se screens, w810 was a very pleasant surprise after 750 for example. also i do liked k800 screen, but i didnt liked to zoom on pix or watch videos, cos it didnt offered me the same quality like the mentioend models in my former post.
and next to it, imo a 5mp cam fone, should deserve better then a 262k screen.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
(so much for all this 16 millions colors...he he)
a human eye cant see 16 mill colors anyway...so why the big rush about 16 mill ????
N82 has a even more dull screen then N95...
_________________
I K850, W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-14 16:20 ] |
tai020381
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
SE choses 65k colour screen. Its their choice. I guess on the testing phase they already saw the difference between 16m & 65k colours on their X1 display. AND now they present it. The point I'm about to make is that
SE ALREADY ANNOUNCE 65K COLOUR ON THEIR NEW X1 PHONE~~~ AND NO ONE ELSE CAN CHANGE THE FACT!!! For those who do not like what SE announced, simply don't buy their products!!~~
I myself really marvelled at what SE did to their newer 262k coloured screens compared to other 16m screens. That is what I really called "LIKE NO OTHERS" |
|
|
Posted: 2008-02-13 08:06
