| Author |
Back to SE again! |
Lunion
Joined: Jul 14, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: East Coast, UK
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-01-27 14:32:07, Xellar wrote:
It's interesting how in a thread stating one uses a W580i now this phone never again is mentioned. 
i was just reading through and thinking the EXACT same thing!!
If you live in a glass house, don't be chuckin stuff about. |
|
|
islandprd
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Posts: 176
PM |
On 2008-01-27 14:30:19, BobaFett wrote:
actually time will show which of the 2 mentioend fones will be more prefered by the users... one thing is sure. se couldnt show until now a really good smart fone imo
Agree
On 2008-01-27 14:32:07, Xellar wrote:
It's interesting how in a thread stating one uses a W580i now this phone never again is mentioned.
Yes you are right there 
I wonder why must some people so bitter if anyone wants to use w580 Let him or her be. It is his or her own money |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
@island
@mib
Not 40+ gr, it is 54 gr (almost one extra phone), you suck at math
You are bitching about grams here.  What's the matter...a few grams more is too heavy for you? You guys must be really mal-nourished? |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
I actualy have no idea why the SE Fanboys brought up the W910,my 1st post in this thread when i said Toy i was talking about W580,then NightBlade and Razec brought in the poor W910.
islandprd
The N81 is faster than N95-8GB in certain things like App Manager, booting up, starting apps and booting the Music Player, although the N95-8GB is NOT slow in the 1st place but once you put it next to a N81 you will see quite a few differences in speed,and that N81 is faster. N81 has the 369mhz CPU whereas N95 has 330mhz so i guess the extra 39mhz makes a bit of a diff.
_________________
Nokia N81 +2GB MicroSD
. . . .THE NEXT EPISODE. . . .
N81 Blog: www.my.opera.com/tsepz/blog
http://www.myspace.com/gucci_011
[ This Message was edited by: GUCCI.011 on 2008-01-27 14:42 ] |
islandprd
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Posts: 176
PM |
@Mib
Normally people refer to + sign on two digit numbers is for a few more gr like one or two gr more. 14 gr dif out of 40 gr is 35% more you know. In the case of w910 vs N81, the N81 is around 62% heavier. Your perspective sucks
Sorry to the thread starter as this is too much OT
@GUCCI
I and several other users of N95 8GB who moved from older SE A100 find symbian rather laggy. There are many times when I press a button nothing happens untill a second or two later which never happen in A100. I dont own N81 or W910 hence asking  Thanks for the explanation
[ This Message was edited by: islandprd on 2008-01-27 14:54 ] |
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
On 2008-01-27 15:46:27, islandprd wrote:
@Mib
Normally people refer to + sign on two digit numbers is for a few more gr like one or two gr more. 14 gr dif out of 40 gr is 35% more you know. In the case of w910 vs N81, the N81 is around 62% heavier. Your perspective sucks
Sorry to the thread starter as this is too much OT
N81 is VASTLY too heavy for it's size and features, that's a plain, simple fact, don't confuse it with the infinitely superior N95/82 etc either.
5610 XM is a better bet for anyone wanting a music device, it shows all SE's the way to go home IMO.
|
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
@ islandprd
Thats something you don't face with N81, ive had a A100, i had a W880 for a little while,and then got a N80 which was horribly slow sometimes, and then got the N81 last month and compared to a W880 this is just as fast. Ive compared N81 to my mates N95-8gb and what you described is what i faced a few times with his N95-8GB, especialy when installing a file above 10MB.
@ mweb
Yes the N81 is heavier, i found that strange at 1st before i knew what hardware was in it. AFAIK the 5610 offers a cheaper DSP than N81, although 5610 has brilliant sound quality the N81 is better. But 5610 is a great W910 rival,although SE java is more advanced than NOKIA JAVA.
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
technical-expert
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Pacific Rim
PM |
Hi all,
Im suprised to know the w580 has better sound quality.
From Moto Rokr e8 Review
Tastes vary, so no clear leader can be defined in the competition. All of the latest XpressMusic, Beatz and ROKR phones offer comparable quality levels and begin to threat even the casual mp3 players which have been all about music since the day of their invention, just like today's top camera phones are about to compete with some of the smaller hand-held casual cameras. If you listen to one of these with your eyes closed, it's really hard to tell which one is playing. After listening for some time a SonyEricsson can be more or less verifiably distinguished from the rest of contestants for an inferior audio quality, the difference from the leaders in this case can be told with a little effort.
Source
http://www.smape.com/en/reviews/motorola/Motorola_E8-rev.html
 K700-  W800- [W810]- W200-[ P990]=[Current]. One expert at esato that never lets u down technical-expert. |
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
More or less agree with your comments Gucci, but something that both yourself AND the walkman fans have to appreciate is that the 5610XM costs peanuts (170 in the UK) but sounds great AND has the best cam in ANY music device!!
|
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
@ mweb
Very true, 3MP camera is not very common in Music Orientated phones, the only other music phone with a great camera is the W960. 5610 price is realy low for what you get, its a steal lol.
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-01-27 07:48:38, GUCCI.011 wrote:
W910 has:
Java
Aww cute shake control
|
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2008-01-27 16:44:26, mweb6161 wrote:
More or less agree with your comments Gucci, but something that both yourself AND the walkman fans have to appreciate is that the 5610XM costs peanuts (170 in the UK) but sounds great AND has the best cam in ANY music device!!
off topic but,
since you have said "music device!!" and not music centric device i would like to include K800, K850 imobile SO905iCS N95 8Gb and more which kills 5610's camera with no doubt. all the phones that i mentioned were music enabled
and i dont even think walkman's best 2 megapixels (W800/W810/W900) are inferior to 5610's camera quality especially when considering the fact that Nokia tends to boost colors exagerrately which sometimes ruins the naturality of the image  not to mention 5610's sensor is smaller then the best 2 mpixels
10 years at Esato |
Trev1982
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: 192.168.0.6
PM |
im coming back to S/E i cant wait had a n93i and n95 and finally gave into missing a p-series phone roll on saturday
BB 8120 |
jakontil
Joined: Jun 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Changi, Chatswood, Cikarang
PM |
@GUCCI,
i'd have to agree with you, a W960 boasts a decent camera, compared to all W-series phones. it's decent, but doesn't mean the best, but compared to other's W-series, it's quite good.... |
|
|
Posted: 2008-01-27 14:36
K700- 
W800- 
