| Author |
N82 vs k850.......(some new good pics [800 x 600]) |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
about the Manchester United pictures (one of my favo football teams  ).......the first N82-pic looks good, but the other 3 pics looks bleached and little blurry.
quite sure that K850 had produced better quality then this 3 last pics...
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-07 17:30 ] |
|
|
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
N82 is certainly amazing, everybody including eldar recommends it over k850 |
oko13
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
Posts: 5
From: Poland
PM |
the 2nd and 4th photos are either good. i think that the 3rd pfoto isn't so good as rest because the settings aren't good reseated.
ps. plankgatan have you any proof?
[ This Message was edited by: oko13 on 2008-04-07 20:13 ] |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
N82 kicks k850s ass end of story. Anyone who argues otherwise is simpley a SE fanboy. N82 is better in every way including pic quality. K850 lacks in colour and ruins the pics.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
N82 kicks ass ???? so you mean this 3-4 Manchester pics are good ???? (even a K800 had made it better)
think everyone (except ONE) looks quite bad.
ps.. i also think some N82 pics looks very good,so im not some N82-hater.
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-07 21:05 ] |
Sony α
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: LDN/TYO
PM, WWW
|
@jj03
Old Trafford is an Evil place - we always lose there, FORZA ROMA!!!!
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
@bavlondon...you want to see some real K850 color-pics...check this out. freaking awesome (some guy who post his flickr. adress to me)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mauasca/sets/72157603576023187/
or what do you think about the colors on this pic, (took it yesterday outside my school).
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-07 21:23 ] |
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
f... n82!i can have it but i don't wanna! you nokia boys if you love your nokia like we love s.e. go to other manufacturers forum don't sh... in the middle of the best s.e. forum you don't belong here anyway 
[ This Message was edited by: croatia on 2008-04-07 21:28 ] |
vladn02
Joined: Sep 17, 2007
Posts: 259
From: Ukraine
PM |
well actually this is a thread n82 vs k850 picture quality lol so yeah nokia does belong here, so dont be an ass.
|
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Damn right
|
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
Im using k810 and like it very much. As much as I like SE, N82 photos are really better. No bias.
@P
u say the k850 colour is better than N82 by showing those flowers. U need to COMPARE. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
Fact....... K850 produce better details
Fact.......N82 have better color saturation
i much rather have a camera who produce better details then thicker colors. (colors can "allways" been improved by some intregate software, [[excactley like Nokia do with its after editing software]], BUT details you cant improve. (because it depending of the hardware,
(sensor, etc) not some cam-driver)
so once again, K850 win..((much better screen, more beatiful, better batterytime, smaller  ))
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-08 15:15 ] |
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
On 2008-04-08 16:02:25, plankgatan wrote:
Fact....... K850 produce better details
Fact.......N82 have better color saturation
i much rather have a camera who produce better details then thicker colors. (colors can "allways" been improved by some intregate software, [[excactley like Nokia do with its after editing software]], BUT details you cant improve. (because it depending of the hardware,
(sensor, etc) not some cam-driver)
so once again, K850 win..((much better screen, more beatiful, better batterytime, smaller ))
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-08 15:15 ]
My Opinion....... K850 produce better details
My Opinion.......N82 have better color saturation
There. Fixed it for you.
[ This Message was edited by: Paul in LA on 2008-04-08 15:31 ] |
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
My opinion....... N82 produce better details
My opinion.......N82 have better color saturation
My opinion..... K850 produces real colours
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
when a N82 can take pics like this (with this details & sharpness), you guys let me know...
K850 have for the moment a better camera... no doubt about that
(thanks Luci)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-08 20:20 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-04-07 18:25
