| Author |
K850i camera vs G800 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
HAVE THE WHOLE WORLD GOING MAD ?????????????
K850 DOSE NOT PRODUCE THIS KIND OF 100% CRAPPY PICTURES...HE HE HE...ITS JUST SILLY TO SEE THIS PICTURES.....END OF STORY
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 12:22 ] |
|
|
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
i agree with numb
k850 have terrible picture quality and really really sucks sensor
for me K750 is the best(best color, sharpness...)
i am waiting fro better camea from SE than k800 and k850
OnePlus 8 |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
I think there is a definite quality control issue with K850, since many people have had to take theirs back several times to get a replacment before they got a good one, whereas some people, such as plankgaton, got a good one from the start.
|
larry 68
Joined: Nov 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
plankgatan I think you are misguided in your belief that ALL K850i camera's take pictures of the same quality as yours, THEY MOST CERTAINLY DO NOT, there are plenty of examples of poor pictures .
I cannot for the life of me see the point of having the AUTO settings on the camera as they very rarely give good results, tweaking seems the only answer to getting half decent shots and even then its hit and miss.
This has to be the most frustrating camera/phone I've ever owned due to never being able to use it as a point and shoot for random opportunity quick pics and surely that would be half the point of having a camera that you carry 24/7 otherwise id plan when i wanted to take pics and have my digi with me !
|
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
The two k850i's i handled had atrocious purple fringing, vastly inferior to the G600 i ran at the same time.
G800 with zero reservations IMO.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
whatever...........
just look at the k850 thread or go to Flickr.com.....its more people then myself who get good pictures...
my old cid36 k750 manage good sharp outdoor pictures....nothing more
k750 indoor, "flash" & low light pics looks terrible.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k70500, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 13:26 ] |
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
On 2008-01-05 14:23:41, plankgatan wrote:
whatever...........
just look at the k850 thread or go to Flickr.com.....its more people then myself who get awesome pictures...
my old cid36 k750 manage good sharp outdoor pictures....nothing more
k750 indoor, "flash" & low light pics looks terrible.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k70500, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 13:25 ]
Well yeah, and it's more people than just me that had PF in evidence, just read any forum. 
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i realy give a shit if you/we/they buy G800 or k850....i shouldnt buy G800...it take worse pics then k850.....nearly all pics ive seen on Flickr.com looks blurry.
if you want a good camera phone....here is my advice:
1.
N82
2.
k850 or Viewty
(i had N82, but i send it back, because of the horrible D-Pad....it had terrible design & you press wrong buttons all time when you use it...but the camera is AWESOME..no doubt about that)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 13:38 ] |
numb
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-01-05 13:21:52, plankgatan wrote:
HAVE THE WHOLE WORLD GOING MAD ?????????????
K850 DOSE NOT PRODUCE THIS KIND OF 100% CRAPPY PICTURES...HE HE HE...ITS JUST SILLY TO SEE THIS PICTURES.....END OF STORY
Oh really ?
Heres the proof
http://spawnweb.dk/k850/DSC00081.JPG
http://spawnweb.dk/k850/DSC00087.JPG
Check the exif data on the original unedited pics and tell me again that they are not produced by the k850
|
JaffaTB
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 85
PM |
i still think the k800 is the king of the point and shoot phones, it has xenon flash whereas the k750 only has LED, the k850 might take great pics if you take the time to set up the settings for the image you are trying to capture but by the time you have done that whatever you were trying to photo has probably finished, i have many pics taken with my k800 and nearly all of them i saw something interesting took out my phone and took a photo of it, i can't do this with my k850  |
Waspinator
Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Posts: 115
PM |
What's on the dinner table plankgatan  |
Laxen
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: 27
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-01-05 14:47:43, numb wrote:
On 2008-01-05 13:21:52, plankgatan wrote:
HAVE THE WHOLE WORLD GOING MAD ?????????????
K850 DOSE NOT PRODUCE THIS KIND OF 100% CRAPPY PICTURES...HE HE HE...ITS JUST SILLY TO SEE THIS PICTURES.....END OF STORY
Oh really ?
Heres the proof
http://spawnweb.dk/k850/DSC00081.JPG
http://spawnweb.dk/k850/DSC00087.JPG
Check the exif data on the original unedited pics and tell me again that they are not produced by the k850
What? Is it you who taken this pictures? They really suck, I got a K850 and it produce MUCH better pictures than that. Just look att the K850 thread. My Old W550i produced that kind of picture that you post. |
JaffaTB
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 85
PM |
mine takes such low quality photos too....what build is your phone? mine is a 07W40, whats yours? |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
once again
i dont care if the whole world want to buy G800...
i shouldnt buy G800...it take worse pics then k850.....nearly all pics ive seen on Flickr.com looks blurry.
if you want a good camera phone....here is my advice:
1.
N82
2.
k850 or Viewty
when a G800 can produce this quality i buy it
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 14:06 ] |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-01-05 14:23:41, plankgatan wrote:
whatever...........
just look at the k850 thread or go to Flickr.com.....its more people then myself who get good pictures...
my old cid36 k750 manage good sharp outdoor pictures....nothing more
k750 indoor, "flash" & low light pics looks terrible.
K750 takes great low light pictures with the camera light which is stronger than the K800 flash so therefore you can take pictures further away than K800, but without using 400 iso giving terrible water colour edges to the picture as in K800. Many K800 flash pictures are completely useless unless resized to less than 2MP equivalent. Maybe K850 is better than K800, but there is nothing wrong with K750 low light pics.
Pictures of night scenes, where flash or light are useless, come out very good if you under-expose slightly - this eliminates the K750 white lines problem. I have many awesome K750 night shots.
btw don't think that just because your phone is good that all are the same. Even on the K750 I saw wide variety of quality of camera modules, even to the extent of swapping camera modules from one phone to another and seeing a change in quality of the pictures as a result. So I think it's perfectly feasible that some people have dodgy cameras. No need to accuse people of making it up or of being bad photographers.
_________________
File System Tweaks for the K750 K750 Tricks
K800 Tips and Themes
Max's K800 Page
[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2008-01-05 15:07 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-01-05 13:21
