| Author |
K850 Firmware Overview |
reggiele
Joined: Oct 21, 2007
Posts: 85
From: HN PRC
PM |
On 2008-04-26 03:27:25, mr versatile wrote:
@reggiele
Did you tried it yet i am anxious to here your take on this reflashing of the firmware please reply with positive or the negatives either way
The result, as fas I can take, is positive - nothing to lose. Strange thing is my phone achieved as high as 980 in Jbenchmark2!! |
|
|
iva_se
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: 213
From: Georgia, Tbilisi
PM, WWW
|
R1EA037: Camera Driver 3.7
R1CA037: Camera Driver 2.9
R1EA037: Camera Driver 3.7
R1CA037: Camera Driver 2.9
R1EA037: Camera Driver 3.7
R1CA037: Camera Driver 2.9
R1EA037:Camera Driver 3.7
R1CA037: Camera Driver 2.9
 |
sblant
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 34
PM, WWW
|
from this photo it seems that R1EA037 is a downgrade and not an upgrade  |
sielski666
Joined: Aug 26, 2006
Posts: 247
From: Barrow-In-Furness, Cumbria
PM |
@ iva_se
that was a good test man, does look like there is no point paying as of yet like seen as the pic show good evidence not to lol.
good work again
|
sniper_supra
Joined: Feb 16, 2008
Posts: 266
PM |
@IVA SE
what iso did you use with it? I always use iso 100 to avoid overburn. |
iva_se
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: 213
From: Georgia, Tbilisi
PM, WWW
|
R1EA037: ISO - Auto
R1CA037: ISO - Auto |
sniper_supra
Joined: Feb 16, 2008
Posts: 266
PM |
On 2008-04-26 12:42:31, iva_se wrote:
R1EA037: ISO - Auto
R1CA037: ISO - Auto
whoah. tried auto with flash and surely is blinding white. 3.7 driver does not calculate light exposure pretty well.
Better use iso 100 until new firmware...
or wait for xs++ 3.2 for modification... |
reggiele
Joined: Oct 21, 2007
Posts: 85
From: HN PRC
PM |
On 2008-04-26 12:42:31, iva_se wrote:
R1EA037: ISO - Auto
R1CA037: ISO - Auto
Are you sure the light sensor hole on the back is free from dirt?? Sometimes flashburn results because the sensor hole is not clean... |
iva_se
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: 213
From: Georgia, Tbilisi
PM, WWW
|
Yes I am sure |
naveensiva
Joined: May 21, 2006
Posts: 441
From: (((INDIA)))
PM, WWW
|
yes actuaaly there is a lot of flash burn....
next frimware SHOULD FIX THIS LONG BUG...!!!! |
iva_se
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: 213
From: Georgia, Tbilisi
PM, WWW
|
naveensiva, When????? |
tai020381
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
Weird. Mine does not have flashburn and I'm running on R1EA037 with 3.7 camera software.
 |
Vlad83
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 143
From: Miami, FL U.S.
PM |
Iva_se, while a good test, it's not scientific. Unless you were using the same phone and rolled back the driver back forth, the potential of different variables effecting the outcome is too great when using two different sets of hardware. Can be the flash, the sensor, build date, etc. I have compared my phone's pics to another k850 of the same fw in a similar test and they contained noticeable differences as well, albeit not to the extent of your test but they existed nonetheless. |
tutarchiv
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 7
PM |
tho most problem is the sensor for the light. Dust make it black an the cam make a pucture with the light.
|
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
btw, you cannot rate "flash burn" when only using 1-3 surfaces. You must use a few more to get a consistent result. The finish of a surface is very key to evaluating this, no?
|AppleTV2|iPhone 12Mini 256GB|iPad Pro 256GB| Previously ...  K750|Z500|Z520|K700|K790i|K850i, :Ericsson: T18z|T28World|T36m x3|T68m (Ericsson, not the rebranded T68i). |
|
|
Posted: 2008-04-26 05:34
T610 
K800i 
