| Author |
post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
parallax error refers to the way a non-SLR optical viewfinder frames the image at an offset compared to the actual image that falls on the sensor or film.
In an SLR, or a digital camera with lcd viewfinder, the image in the viewfinder is framed exactly as it appears on the censor or film. (no offset)
|
|
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-10-19 03:36:27, jali wrote:
Please can somebody help me.
Got a new SE K850 on O2. With auto setting the photos taken with flash on are really dark (I am not blocking the sensor or the flash with my hand/fingers) . In fact photos taken in minimal light condition (Indoor + out door) without flash are better. Am I doing something wrong or does the flash sucks.
Will appreciate any help
[snip!]
Your problem is probably that the K850i uses faster shutter speeds for flash photos. Remember that the range of the flash is not very long! Probably just long enough for something you can reach with your arm and a little bit more.
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-10-19 09:49 ] |
Superluminova
Joined: Feb 24, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: ...Mummies Tummy!
PM |
Here's a wee random shot from yesterday:
OBEY GAINT |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
wow...very very good sharpness & colors...nice 
|
gola
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM |
@max_wedge,do you think DSLRs such as that one will always stay huge in size or will they become smaller as technology advances?possibly as small as an average mobile phone,just being a bit optimistic
"Getting wisdom is the wisest thing you can do!"
Proverbs 4: 7 |
jmcomms
Joined: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Jonathan Morris
PM, WWW
|
You wouldn't want a DSLR to get too small. It's for a different purpose, where you need easily accessible manual control, large lenses, a big display for photo checking and decent battery life - plus the ability to add attachments.
There's little chance of the humble cameraphone ever hitting SLR sales, any more than a standard standalone digital camera is any threat. Well, actually there might be a few situations where the paps use smaller cameras to get pictures they might not otherwise get, but that's about it.
Jonathan Morris
Editor, What Mobile magazine - the UK's leading mobile phone magazine
www.whatmobile.netforum.whatmobile.net
Twitter @jmcomms |
indup
Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 243
PM |
"cloudy" otherwise basic/normal settings
basic/normal settings
[ This Message was edited by: indup on 2007-10-19 17:27 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
sharpness from 5 M.P
night shoots.......Daniel Craig looks cool, like allways..he he
flash outdoor
_________________
I  k850i,  w810i &  T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-19 20:33 ] |
marinedisco
Joined: Jun 24, 2007
Posts: 68
From: Thailand
PM |
To me the photo's are incredible!! Much better then the expected. Can't wait untill it comes out in here in Thailand.
Are any of you using noise reduction software or photoshop? |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
This thread is now becoming a big rival to the imobile 902 picture post thread.
@plangkatan:
you always make nice shots from all scenes. your nightshots are incredible!  i think whizzkid should add more thrones for his next esato award next year and i'll vote you as Best esato photographer
10 years at Esato |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-10-19 04:48:42, max_wedge wrote:
parallax error refers to the way a non-SLR optical viewfinder frames the image at an offset compared to the actual image that falls on the sensor or film.
In an SLR, or a digital camera with lcd viewfinder, the image in the viewfinder is framed exactly as it appears on the censor or film. (no offset)
@max - Well .......................... make it - PARELLEL-error then mate !
@planks - Nice shots again matey . . . just a Q here matey . . . are you UPLOADIN' images as they were taken ? I mean, do you EDIT those, say, adjusting on the sharpness and all  They are excellent that's why . . .
[addsig] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
i dont think he is editing his pix, me seems those are the "original" ones
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-10-20 01:10:02, razec wrote:
@plangkatan:
i think whizzkid should add more thrones for his next esato award next year and i'll vote you as Best esato photographer
. . . during MY time here (circa 2003) . . . Marlonski was considered ONE of the BEST images (taken from any kind of cam) UPLOADER  He does NOT frequent the Esato Forum much lately . . .  Hope he'll make a RETURN-of-the-COMEBACK here . . .
[addsig] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2007-10-20 01:43:05, *Jojo* wrote:
On 2007-10-20 01:10:02, razec wrote:
@plangkatan:
i think whizzkid should add more thrones for his next esato award next year and i'll vote you as Best esato photographer
Hope he'll make a RETURN-of-the-COMEBACK here . . .
And rival Plangkatan in the photography competition 
10 years at Esato |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@rezec - No doubt that: planks is considered one of the BEST here at present (tranced et al) included . . . but honestly, sometimes his SHOTS seems to be . . . . . . . . . too-good-to-be-TRUE . .. well, maybe he is just that GOOD a - photographer !
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-10-19 04:48
