Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850

Previous  123 ... 181920 ... 328329330  Next
Author post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850
p!xarus
K850 Blue
Joined: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 108
From: Norway
PM
Posted: 2007-10-16 23:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I think the color of the k850's pictures are great, and natural... The pics I have seen the colors have been surprisingly good.
But some fixing can make wonders...
p!xarus
K850 Blue
Joined: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 108
From: Norway
PM
Posted: 2007-10-16 23:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Oh, forgot something

Great shots!!!
I especially liked the shots of your car and cell-phone
drsoran2
K850 Green
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
Posts: 66
From: Kassel, Germany
PM
Posted: 2007-10-17 01:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@ plankgatan I was wondering when the ring around the lens is glooming? Just after activating the cam or every time you take a photo? Do you know if the phone takes Micro SDHC? Which means MicroSD cards larger than 2 GB (eg. 4 GB or even the new 6 GB)? I'm wanting this phone more and more (because of the pictures I see), but I can't decide wheter to wait a few weeks for a little price drop or to get it now! Here in the US it's currently around 600 $ (and net even official released, all imports). I'm original from Germany and just here for an exchange year in the US and they have it in Germany already official out for the same price in Euro!
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-10-17 01:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Well HONESTLY, I am NOT yet amazed by this K850's- 5 MP camera . . . as majority of the ones uploaded here CAN be paralleled with that of the K800's/K810i's and EVEN - K750's . . . so far, it's ONLY dcuk's - yellow flower that stands-out (well, not that amazing though . . .). Make it BETTER guys ! [addsig]
mongoose3800
K800 Black
Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Posts: 416
From: Australia
PM
Posted: 2007-10-17 01:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Guy's don't get me wrong. I can actually see that there is an improvement in the images taken by the K850 over the K800. I just wish that a full res the images looked better. I guess I am being a bit picky because the images are fine when viewed to fit the screen.

The thing I like most about digital photography is that feeling of awe you get when you look at a good photo full size on a large screen and it looks perfect, when you can see really fine details without noise or artifacts and being able to zoom in for a better look. This just won't happen with the K850 or any Camera phone.
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-10-17 02:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-10-16 22:49:33, Pitzon wrote:



Resized only







. . . well, these TWO-uploads are GOOD to my Congrats mate! [addsig]
max_wedge
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-10-17 02:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-10-17 01:51:54, mongoose3800 wrote:
Guy's don't get me wrong. I can actually see that there is an improvement in the images taken by the K850 over the K800. I just wish that a full res the images looked better. I guess I am being a bit picky because the images are fine when viewed to fit the screen.

The thing I like most about digital photography is that feeling of awe you get when you look at a good photo full size on a large screen and it looks perfect, when you can see really fine details without noise or artifacts and being able to zoom in for a better look. This just won't happen with the K850 or any Camera phone.

I agree 100% about the awe factor.

But yet my mum's Kodak 5MP, while better than K850, still doesn't have that nice perfect finish. In my experience you need a prosumer camera or an expensive compact before you even start to get that kind of quality. And I have to say, many of my K800 shots are very clear and sharp and give me that awe factor. Also the results are often disappointing, but ONLY if you are expecting quality digicam results. If you lower your expectations just a little, you will enjoy the good shots so much more.
rockygali
K810 Blue
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-10-17 04:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
B I N G O! @Max

yes, a prosumer camera will definitely give you the results you like minimized or maximized.

coz these camphone can only do what a typical point and shoot cam can do.
and nothing more, for the known reason that the cam module is at its best on that size....

only prosumer cams, or DSLR and eDSLR, EOS, etc etc. can give wonders on major close ups....

im not a photo enthusiast tho i wanna be one. but looking at K850 on 100% res and looking at those edges, i think i will be contented at the results im seeing. those same jaggies, artefacts, infringements etc etc can also be seen in some point & shoot cams if not all... and thats what we have to know about camphones, take can only function as our daily P&S digicams.

why people are fond of camphones, coz they can perform some functions like our P&S cams, theyre compact, and you can make calls from them.

given the chance, i would really love to have a K850 for those once in a lifetime moment, and a prosumer cam for some of those interesting places to visit.

but then again, we all have our preferences....
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..."
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2007-10-17 04:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-10-17 04:16:25, rockygali wrote:
B I N G O! @Max

only prosumer cams, or DSLR and eDSLR, EOS, etc etc. can give wonders on major close ups....



DSLRs is a Type Of Camera, EOS is a brandname under the Canon Camera Family
10 years at Esato
Shuuro
T100
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: 74
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-10-17 06:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-10-16 22:10:49, plankgatan wrote:
no way....(im "convinced" that NO cell phone had done this better).

k850 take better Macro...thats it !!!!



greetings plankgatan,

having read your posts to this forum for quite sometime, i'm sure that no matter what evidence that people provide here to the contrary to your opinion you wont agree but just for the sake of it, below are the links to macro pics taken with a camera phone by DigDub, which were originally posted at hardwarezone.

http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/a4d9cd3b4f.jpg
http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/6e616e1470.jpg
http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/09237591da.jpg

and finally this one: http://flickr.com/photos/shuuro/1417215416/
if i crop above pic at 100% this is what we get to see: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2091/1595315214_b479a245d0_o_d.jpg

I think pics taken with k750i lacks details due to its less mp but it produces much better sharp and vibrant pics when compared to k850i, IMHO.

Others, sorry for this distraction and please continue with your postings. I anticipate kind of responses that i would get and since i made my point, i would try to restrain myself from further posting.


[ This Message was edited by: Shuuro on 2007-10-17 05:58 ]
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-10-17 06:40
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-10-17 06:31:52, Shuuro wrote:


I think pics taken with k750i lacks details due to its less mp but it produces much better sharp and vibrant pics when compared to k850i, IMHO.




. . . with the quality of images I am seein' here (taken from their K850's) at present . . . I would quite AGREE with -shuuro's point ! Let's just give them more time to better their - shots (K850) ! [addsig]
SaLiH
Apple iPhone 6
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 460
From: Bosnia & Herzegovina
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-10-17 12:07
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@Shuuro I was going to post your photos from flickr, and digdub's photos of that fly last night after I saw that post, but I didn't want to do it without your permission. I'm glad you did it. You can post your shots taken by i-mobile 902 in this thread if you want.

http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=157152#post2134412
Nokia 3310->Nokia 2100->Nokia 3100->Sony Ericsson K700i->Sony Ericsson K750i->i-mobile 902->Sony Ericsson K800i->Sony Ericsson T650i->Sony Ericsson C901->Sony Ericsson Elm->iPhone 3GS->iPhone 4s->iPhone 5->iPhone 5s->iPhone 6->iPhone 6s->iPhone 7 Plus
rockygali
K810 Blue
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-10-17 12:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-10-17 04:26:05, razec wrote:

On 2007-10-17 04:16:25, rockygali wrote:
B I N G O! @Max

only prosumer cams, or DSLR and eDSLR, EOS, etc etc. can give wonders on major close ups....



DSLRs is a Type Of Camera, EOS is a brandname under the Canon Camera Family



copy that HQ, i know that... just wanted to enumerate as far as i can.
maybe others arent familiar with DSLR then EOS will ring the bell.. sumthin like that...
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..."
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2007-10-17 12:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@SaLiH (no offend,) but some of the i-mobile pics are not so very good....(special the indoor pics but also some of the outdoor pics)...they looks blurry and unsharp.....(like i said...no offend)...

after i have seen this i-mobile pics, i even more sure that k850 take better Macro, portrait & Flash...........see you.
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2007-10-17 13:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-10-17 12:50:17, plankgatan wrote:
@SaLiH (no offend,) but some of the i-mobile pics are not so very good....(special the indoor pics but also some of the outdoor pics)...they looks blurry and unsharp.....(like i said...no offend)...

after i have seen this i-mobile pics, i even more sure that k850 take better Macro, portrait & Flash...........see you.



A Better Sensor used in 902 has an advantage over the k850 by means of a more qualitative shots: more accurate colors, higher dynamic range and sharper details. but given the decade-long intelligence of Sony in making cameras they can even improve K850's camera quality by their well known imaging algorithm in measuring autofocus reliability, flash range optimization and many more. but the thing that hinders K850 in taking over 902's camera power was the sensor inferiority.
10 years at Esato
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 181920 ... 328329330  Next
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic