| Author |
post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 |
holeinone
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 18
PM |
 |
|
|
DonJuan
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Las Vegas
PM |
guys when you have took your pic, go to camera album then choose a pic then go to options then click on photofix, a few of the pics here look like they need some contrast. once the k850 has finished just save the pic and upload both pics onto your comp, youll see the difference that small thing can do to your pics. Its kinda like auto level on photoshop
here is my cat
document setting, daylight white balance and exposure down to -0.7 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-01-03 17:56:37, n4d3r wrote:
On 2008-01-02 14:50:38, plankgatan wrote:
k850..old firmware 029
I kind of find it hard to believe that this picture was taken with k850i. sorry. Unless you took his picture while holding the phone upside down then rotating the image later on,,, there is no way you can produce the shadow of the flash on the right side of the cat. With k850's the close up pictures that are taken with flash should produce a shadow on the left side of the object since the flash is located on the right of the camera lens.
Unless there was a stronger source of light than the camera flash shining at a different angle, i have to call this picture a fake. Sorry 
[ This Message was edited by: n4d3r on 2008-01-03 16:59 ]
[ This Message was edited by: n4d3r on 2008-01-03 17:02 ]
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ???????????????
OF COURSE ITS TAKEN WITH MY K850...I TOOK THIS PIC NEARLY UPPSIDE DOWN...THE CAT WAS LAYING IN THE BED AND WAS PLAYING AROUND, I JUST TOOK A FLASH PIC..AND VOILA.
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-03 23:09 ] |
DonJuan
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Las Vegas
PM |
I believe its a k850 pic. I dont see why he would lie anyway. There might have been better light but who cares if there was. Its a good pic and thats all it comes down to |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
im stunned.......check this sharpness...(looks nearly better in full size
indoor...no flash...no photo dj...no color editing...no auto level
EV +0.3
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg
EV +0.7
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg
EV 0.0
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7284/dsc07760fz6.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-03 23:40 ] |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-01-04 00:36:24, plankgatan wrote:
im stunned.......check this sharpness...
Honestly, the two first pictures are not good. Best seen in the background and around the edges of things.
Third one is above average
_________________
I'm an expert
The Unofficial Sony Ericsson Blog | FORUM
Best dedicated blog ever!
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2008-01-03 23:44 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
eeehhhhh..its a ordinary camera...and a small ordinary camera CANT make the background sharp....you need a system camera for that job..
when you focus on a object with a ordinary cam, IT MAKE THE OBJECT SHARP...NOT THE BACKGROUND...
i think this low light indoor-pics are awesome for a cell phone...
EV +0.3
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg
EV +0.7
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg
EV 0.0
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7284/dsc07760fz6.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-03 23:52 ] |
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-01-03 14:45:46, vojta66 wrote:
So.....K850i......finally....could not resist the temptation.....another one.....
First random pictures.....
Another ones from my office window...
i remember this pictures from the k750 pictures thread
and p1 Pictures thread
k750 is only 2mpx and the pictures are better 
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
k850 can produce good pics to...but its camera is realy sensitive, thats why you need to use the profiles properley
found some nice ones
http://img148.imageshack.us/i[....]4/2150007780409f120d04oth0.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 01:35 ] |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-01-04 00:44:30, plankgatan wrote:
eeehhhhh..its a ordinary camera...and a small ordinary camera CANT make the background sharp....you need a system camera for that job..
when you focus on a object with a ordinary cam, IT MAKE THE OBJECT SHARP...NOT THE BACKGROUND...
You do know that celluar phone cameras can't make use of their focusing abilities on items further away than a few meters, right? Then you should know that both the foreground and background should be equally sharp on those pictures.
And one more thing, most system cameras are capable of doing this, so they'd focus on the foreground and blur out the background - even if the object is several metres away. Exact opposite of what you're saying.
(and why were you posting the same pictures again  )
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
why are you complaining ?????
dont you have some pics from your own cell phone to show...
and yes..i think this indoor pics are realy good..actually one of the best indoor pics ive taken with my k850.
replay...for the third time:
EV +0.3
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg
EV +0.7
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 01:39 ] |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
OK, now you've gone over the top with these pictures. Dude, you've just posted three of the exact same pictures and links THREE times! (edit: OK, you've removed one of them from your last post)
And I'm not complaining, merely correcting you and commenting on the quality of those "really good" shots. K850's camera is not bad, but I had expected more.
_________________
I'm an expert
The Unofficial Sony Ericsson Blog | FORUM
Best dedicated blog ever!
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2008-01-04 01:41 ] |
DonJuan
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Las Vegas
PM |
Lol at plank. He sure does support his k850. This phone struggles in low light conditions when taking pictures of ppl. I was looking at some pic's i took when my friends had came out and the quality of our skin was really bad. It looked like we all had make up on. I'll post them so you can see what i mean. I dont think the camera is amazing tho. I take a lot of pictures with it and they look really bad. So much noise. But as a camera phone it'll do |
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Try documents scene and decrease the exposure a bit in daylight, for many shots it work well  |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-01-04 02:37:00, plankgatan wrote:
why are you complaining ?????
dont you have some pics from your own cell phone to show...
and yes..i think this indoor pics are realy good..actually one of the best indoor pics ive taken with my k850.
replay...for the third time:
EV +0.3
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg
EV +0.7
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 01:39 ]
@plankgatan,
I was confused why the second photo with EV +0.7 is darker than the first with EV +0.3. With a higher EV the second should be brighter. But I downloaded your photos and checked. The EV is actually negative.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-01-03 21:30
