| Author |
T650i vs K810i (with live pics) |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
looks like the T650 uses the same 3.2 megapixel cam as the P1.
Both phones look really fresh in design something that ive always liked about SE phones. |
|
|
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Nice comparison shots.
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
Yes the T650 appeals to me more because of the design.
Pity it will be missing some camera functions compared to the K810i (bestpic for one) but I think I can live with that.
I am in love with the T650i 
|
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
@goldenface
if you're in love with a mobile phone, then i'd say you have some problems  
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
@>500
I do have problems 
As long as we don't try to make mini-phones together then all is cool.
|
mailboxmanoj
Joined: May 15, 2007
Posts: 226
PM |
Great show
I feel SE has done a good job by getting the four-way navigation key-pad rather then the prone-to-jam Joystick.....GOOD MOVE!!!
Also the metallic body and scratch-proof screen will make the T650i a big hit |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
what about T650's video recording cap.? |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
On 2007-05-29 09:56:08, mailboxmanoj wrote:
Great show
I feel SE has done a good job by getting the four-way navigation key-pad rather then the prone-to-jam Joystick.....GOOD MOVE!!!
Also the metallic body and scratch-proof screen will make the T650i a big hit
Sure as!
It will feel great to hold - just like the W880i - small, weighty and well built. I also wanna see what this new mineral screen is all about.
|
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
@qvga
video has not been confirmed yet. But  have 'successfully' tested vga @30fps on the t650 and sofia.... guess it just comes down to what resolution the company execs choose.....
|
Nyb
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 161
PM |
@goldenface: i guess the mineral screen will be something like the scratch resistant one on the nokia 8800 |
mailboxmanoj
Joined: May 15, 2007
Posts: 226
PM |
I will tell u why Nokia is making a big mistake:
They have like fools abandoned the metallic form and gone plastic with the N95,a bad move from the built point of view and also from the enviroment point of view.
SE can do us a big favour by getting in strong metallic cell frames which are long-lasting and also re-cycleable,also they are very very sturdy giving the tough look.
[ This Message was edited by: mailboxmanoj on 2007-05-29 09:18 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-05-29 10:14:16, mailboxmanoj wrote:
I will tell u why Nokia is making a big mistake:
They have like fools abandoned the metallic form and gone plastic with the N95,a bad move from the built point of view and also from the enviroment point of view.
SE can do us a big favour by getting in strong metallic cell frames which are long-lasting and also re-cycleable,also they are very very sturdy giving the torugh look.
you really have no idea what you're talking about, do you? N95 is already very expensive, adding metallic structure similar to 8800 would make its price go off the roof. And also, metal frames are not long lasting, they get scratched and bent easily no matter what you use. Plastic has been working for all manufacturers including SE and thats where they should stick. |
mailboxmanoj
Joined: May 15, 2007
Posts: 226
PM |
Nope u did not get my point..
N95 is expensive for its features,but a plastic body makes it no doubt very light but not good for ur daily use,also plastic has no ending u cannot destroy it...
Metallic frames are prone to scratches but they can minimise it by adding scratch proof mechanisms....
Anybody will tell you plastic is harmful for enviroment.
also there is going to be a big question of recycling phones once the Technology dies out...
[ This Message was edited by: mailboxmanoj on 2007-05-29 09:25 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-05-29 10:25:20, mailboxmanoj wrote:
Nope u did not get my point..
N95 is expensive for its features,but a plastic body makes it no doubt very light but not good for ur daily use,also plastic has no ending u cannot destroy it...
Metallic frames are prone to scratches but they can minimise it by adding scratch proof mechanisms....
Anybody will tell you plastic is harmful for enviroment.
also there is going to be a big question of recycling phones once the Technology dies out...
[ This Message was edited by: mailboxmanoj on 2007-05-29 09:25 ]
it would have made the phone ridiculously expensive, its that simple.
why didnt SE make P1 full metallic? simply because it would then be too expensive. |
mailboxmanoj
Joined: May 15, 2007
Posts: 226
PM |
Thats OK.
It depends on what type of a person u are,I can compramise on a few features in my phone but would rather make it sturdy and tough from outside. |
|
|
Posted: 2007-05-29 02:03
